| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The code flow doesn't fall through to walkcbfs, as it does in the rest
of bootblock.S. Instead, walkcbfs is called (albeit via a jmp). The
linker cannot know this when walkcbfs.S is included directly.
When we use a CAR bootblock, we lose several hundred bytes because
walkcbfs is not garbage-collected, yet it isn't used. This problem
is solved by assembling walkcbfs.S separately, and linking it.
Change-Id: Ib3a976db09b9ff270b7677cb4f9db80b0b025e22
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11785
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Assume that it's 64 byte.
Change-Id: I168facd92f64c2cf99c26c350c60317807a4aed4
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10919
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
It never made sense to have bootblock_* in init, but
pirq_routing.c in boot, and some ld scripts on the main
level while others live in subdirectories.
This patch flattens the directory hierarchy and makes
x86 more similar to the other architectures.
Change-Id: I4056038fe7813e4d3d3042c441e7ab6076a36384
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10901
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
