Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Add the timestamp tick frequency within the timestamp table so
the cbmem utility doesn't try to figure it out on its own. Those
paths still exist for x86 systems which don't provide tsc_freq_mhz().
All other non-x86 systems use the monotonic timer which has a 1us
granularity or 1MHz.
One of the main reasons is that Linux is reporting
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/cpuinfo_max_freq as the true
turbo frequency on turbo enables machines. This change also fixes
the p-state values honored in cpufreq for turbo machines in that
turbo p-pstates were reported as 100MHz greater than nominal.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44669
BRANCH=firmware-strago-7287.B
TEST=Built and booted on glados. Confirmed table frequency honored.
Change-Id: I763fe2d9a7b01d0ef5556e5abff36032062f5801
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11470
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
It never made sense to have bootblock_* in init, but
pirq_routing.c in boot, and some ld scripts on the main
level while others live in subdirectories.
This patch flattens the directory hierarchy and makes
x86 more similar to the other architectures.
Change-Id: I4056038fe7813e4d3d3042c441e7ab6076a36384
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10901
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|