| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Provide a common implementation to add an MTRR entry for memory-
mapped boot ROMs.
Change-Id: I9fabc6b87fb36dc3d970805eb804cd950b8849d4
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26577
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Certain platforms need to pass different stack pointer values to
postcar depending on S3 resume or not. Add comments to ease the
reader in understanding the point. If different stack values weren't
needed the program was already cached in stage cache with the correct
value.
Change-Id: I7202c62e6202a14416cb49ad5348740174747c7d
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25795
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Justin TerAvest <teravest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I67a470c2c2a659d5355fdd0939d0572c1ff3e291
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21519
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sumeet R Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
|
|
Postcar failed when loading from stage_cache, if
romstage did not pass same pcf->stack on normal
and resume paths.
Change-Id: I853afb1fbdb942fd671d89950911c850c96e3af3
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21444
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Create postcar_frame object without placing stack in CBMEM.
This way same cache_as_ram.inc code can be used unmodified.
Change-Id: Ic5ed404ce268ee881e9893dd434534231aa2bc88
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17700
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Resource allocator and 64-bit PCI BARs will need it and
PCI use is not really restricted to x86.
Change-Id: Ie97f0f73380118f43ec6271aed5617d62a4f5532
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17733
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Stash and reload postcar stage in the stage cache for increased
S3 resume speed. It's impact is small (2 ms or so), but there's
no need to go to the boot media on resume to reload something
that was already loaded. This aligns with the same paths we take
on ramstage as well.
Change-Id: I4313794826120853163c7366e81346858747ed0a
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17649
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
In the current implementation of postcar_frame_add_mtrr,
if provided size is bigger than the base address alignment,
the alignment is considered as size and covered by the MTRRs
ignoring the specified size.
In this case the callee has to make sure that the provided
size should be smaller or equal to the base address alignment
boundary.
To simplify this, utilize additonal MTRRs to cover the entire
size specified. We reuse the code from cpu/x86/mtrr/mtrr.c.
Change-Id: Ie2e88b596f43692169c7d4440b18498a72fcba11
Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16509
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
postcar_loader.c has a useful library of funtions for
setting up stack and MTRRs. Make it available in romstage
irrespective of CONFIG_POSTCAR_STAGE for use in stack setup
after Dram init.
The final step of moving the used and max MTRRs on to stack
is moved to a new function, that can be used outside of
postcar phase.
Change-Id: I322b12577d74268d03fe42a9744648763693cddd
Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16331
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
In order to not muddle arch vs chipset implementations provide
a generic prog_segment_loaded() which calls platform_segment_loaded()
and arch_segment_loaded() in that order. This allows the arch variants
to live in src/arch while the chipset/platform code can implement
their own.
Change-Id: I17b6497219ec904d92bd286f18c9ec96b2b7af25
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14214
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Petrov <andrey.petrov@intel.com>
|
|
While rmodule_load() calls arch_segment_loaded() when it's done
loading any pieces of code which further modify it, like changing
parameters within the program itself, need to notify the rest of
the system.
Change-Id: Ia3374b58488120ba6279592a77d7f9c6217f1215
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14213
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Andrey Petrov <andrey.petrov@intel.com>
|
|
Certain chipsets don't have a memory-mapped boot media
so their code execution for stages prior to DRAM initialization
is backed by SRAM or cache-as-ram. The postcar stage/phase
handles the cache-as-ram situation where in order to tear down
cache-as-ram one needs to be executing out of a backing
store that isn't transient. By current definition, cache-as-ram
is volatile and tearing it down leads to its contents disappearing.
Therefore provide a shim layer, postcar, that's loaded into
memory and executed which does 2 things:
1. Tears down cache-as-ram with a chipset helper function.
2. Loads and runs ramstage.
Because those 2 things are executed out of ram there's no issue
of the code's backing store while executing the code that
tears down cache-as-ram. The current implementation makes no
assumption regarding cacheability of the DRAM itself. If the
chipset code wishes to cache DRAM for loading of the postcar
stage/phase then it's also up to the chipset to handle any
coherency issues pertaining to cache-as-ram destruction.
Change-Id: Ia58efdadd0b48f20cfe7de2f49ab462306c3a19b
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14140
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
