| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change-Id: I79f065703b5249ca9630b06de7142bc52675076e
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32820
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
As discussed on the mailing list and voted upon, the coreboot project
is going to move the majority of copyrights out of the headers and into
an AUTHORS file. This will happen a bit at a time, as we'll be unifying
license headers at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: Ifd4329905847d9dd06de67b9a443c8ee50c0e7a7
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35177
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: If5c5ebacd103d7e1f09585cc4c52753b11ce84d0
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31953
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
CBFS used to have a special region for the x86 bootblock, which also
contained a pointer to a CBFS master header, which describes the
layout of the CBFS.
Since we adopted other architectures, we got rid of the bootblock region
as a separate entity and add the x86 bootblock as a CBFS file now.
The master header still exists for compatibility with old cbfstool
versions, but it's neatly wrapped in either the bootblock file or in a
file carefully crafted at the right location (on all other architectures).
All the layout information we need is now available from FMAP, a core
part of a contemporary coreboot image, even on x86, so we can just use
the generic master header locator in src/lib/cbfs.c and get rid of the
special version.
Among the advantages: the x86 header locator reduced the size of the
CBFS by 64 bytes assuming that there's the bootblock region of at least
that size - this breaks assumptions elsewhere (eg. when walking CBFS in
cbfs_boot_locate() because the last file, the bootblock, will exceed the
CBFS region as seen by coreboot (since it's CBFS - 64bytes).
TEST=emulation/qemu-q35 still boots
Change-Id: I6fa78073ee4015d7769ed588dc67f9b019d42d07
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reported-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/29801
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
|
|
Fix the following errors and warnings detected by checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
ERROR: switch and case should be at the same indent
WARNING: char * array declaration might be better as static const
WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
WARNING: storage class should be at the beginning of the declaration
WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
WARNING: break is not useful after a goto or return
WARNING: Single statement macros should not use a do {} while (0) loop
WARNING: sizeof *t should be sizeof(*t)
WARNING: Comparisons should place the constant on the right side of the test
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: I39d49790c5eaeedec5051e1fab0b1279275f6e7f
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18865
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Fix the following errors and warnings detected by checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '('
ERROR: space prohibited after that open parenthesis '('
ERROR: space prohibited before that close parenthesis ')'
ERROR: space prohibited after that open square bracket '['
ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: space prohibited before that ',' (ctx:WxW)
ERROR: space required after that ';' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:ExV)
ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:VxW)
ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '=' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '+=' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '<=' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '||' (ctx:VxW)
ERROR: space prohibited before that '++' (ctx:WxO)
ERROR: need consistent spacing around '+' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '<' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '<' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: need consistent spacing around '>>' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: "(foo*)" should be "(foo *)"
ERROR: "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar"
ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
WARNING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
WARNING: unnecessary whitespace before a quoted newline
WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
WARNING: please, no space before tabs
WARNING: Unnecessary space before function pointer arguments
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: I2d7e1a329c6b2e8ca9633a97b595566544d7fd33
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18862
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Implement writeat and eraseat support into the region_device_ops struct.
Change-Id: Iac2cf32e523d2f19ee9e5feefe1fba8c68982f3d
Signed-off-by: Antonello Dettori <dev@dettori.io>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15318
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
This reverts commit 65e33c08a9a88c52baaadaf515b9591856115a77.
This was the wrong logic to fix the master header.
Change-Id: I4688034831f09ac69abfd0660c76112deabd62ec
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12824
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Since the introduction of the new (interim?) master header, coreboot
searches the whole ROM for CBFS entries. Fix that by aligning it on top
of the ROM.
Change-Id: I080cd4b746169a36462a49baff5e114b1f6f224a
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12810
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
The Chrome OS verified boot path supported multiple CBFS
instances in the boot media as well as stand-alone assets
sitting in each vboot RW slot. Remove the support for the
stand-alone assets and always use CBFS accesses as the
way to retrieve data.
This is implemented by adding a cbfs_locator object which
is queried for locating the current CBFS. Additionally, it
is also signalled prior to when a program is about to be
loaded by coreboot for the subsequent stage/payload. This
provides the same opportunity as previous for vboot to
hook in and perform its logic.
BUG=chromium:445938
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and ran on glados.
CQ-DEPEND=CL:307121,CL:31691,CL:31690
Change-Id: I6a3a15feb6edd355d6ec252c36b6f7885b383099
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12689
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
On x86-64 the current way of calculating the base address
of the boot device (SPI flash) gets an unwanted sign extension,
making it live somewhere at the end of 64bit address space.
Enforce rom_base to be at the upper end of the 4G address space.
Change-Id: Ia81e82094d3c51f6c10e02b4b0df2f3e1519d39e
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11121
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Assume that it's 64 byte.
Change-Id: I168facd92f64c2cf99c26c350c60317807a4aed4
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10919
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
It never made sense to have bootblock_* in init, but
pirq_routing.c in boot, and some ld scripts on the main
level while others live in subdirectories.
This patch flattens the directory hierarchy and makes
x86 more similar to the other architectures.
Change-Id: I4056038fe7813e4d3d3042c441e7ab6076a36384
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10901
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
