| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Since we now have more freedom in the bootblock linking step it no
longer makes sense to use a monolithic bootblock.S. Code segments must
still be included as the order in bootblock.S determines code flow.
However, non-code flow related assembly stubs don't need to be directly
included in bootblock.S
Change-Id: I08e86e92d82bd2138194ed42652f268b0764aa54
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11792
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
The build system was previously determining the flow
and linking scripts bootblock code by the order of files
added to the bootblock_inc bootblock-y variables.Those
files were then concatenated together and built by a myriad of
make rules.
Now bootblock.S and bootblock.ld is added so that bootblock
can be built and linked using the default build rules.
CHIPSET_BOOTBLOCK_INCLUDE is introduced in order to allow the
chipset code to place include files in the path of the bootblock
program -- a replacement for the chipset_bootblock_inc
make variable.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built vortex, rambi, and some asus boards.
Change-Id: Ida4571cbe6eed65e77ade98b8d9ad056353c53f9
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11495
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
It never made sense to have bootblock_* in init, but
pirq_routing.c in boot, and some ld scripts on the main
level while others live in subdirectories.
This patch flattens the directory hierarchy and makes
x86 more similar to the other architectures.
Change-Id: I4056038fe7813e4d3d3042c441e7ab6076a36384
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10901
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
