| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
As discussed on the mailing list and voted upon, the coreboot project
is going to move the majority of copyrights out of the headers and into
an AUTHORS file. This will happen a bit at a time, as we'll be unifying
license headers at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: Ifd4329905847d9dd06de67b9a443c8ee50c0e7a7
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35177
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I91158452680586ac676ea11c8589062880a31f91
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31692
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Clearing the EBDA was introduced with b4aaaa "Prepare the BIOS data
areas before device init." which states that the purpose of setting up
these area's is just to make sure they are sane. On the S3 path doing
this is not needed and can even thrash data set up by payloads (mostly
SeaBIOS) that used that memory.
Change-Id: I9c54156bd8247e8a34dec6edc27cfc2d33cde595
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30789
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
It's more consistent to re-initialize EBDA in all boot paths.
That way, the data living in EBDA is cleared prior to be
accessed (assuming it's after setup_ebda()).
Change-Id: I05ff84f869f7b6a463e52b4cb954acc5566475cd
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21997
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
|
|
This patch provides new APIs to write into EBDA area
and read from EBDA area based on user input structure.
Change-Id: I26d5c0ba82c842f0b734a8e0f03abf148737c5c4
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21536
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sumeet R Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
|
|
Change memcpy()s and memset()s to endian.h wrappers for consistency
and safety. Add zero_n() wrapper to safely clear memory.
Change-Id: If155d82608c81992f05eae4d2223de6f506e98c5
Signed-off-by: Ryan Salsamendi <rsalsamendi@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20240
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Fixes report found by undefined behavior sanitizer. Dereferencing a
pointer that is not aligned to the size of access is undefined behavior.
Switch to memcpy() for unaligned write to EBDA_LOWMEM. Change other
write16()s in setup_ebda() to memcpy() for consistency.
Change-Id: I79814bd47a14ec59d84068b11d094dc2531995d9
Signed-off-by: Ryan Salsamendi <rsalsamendi@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20132
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com>
|
|
Fix the following errors and warnings detected by checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '('
ERROR: space prohibited after that open parenthesis '('
ERROR: space prohibited before that close parenthesis ')'
ERROR: space prohibited after that open square bracket '['
ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: space prohibited before that ',' (ctx:WxW)
ERROR: space required after that ';' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:ExV)
ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:VxW)
ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '=' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '+=' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '<=' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '||' (ctx:VxW)
ERROR: space prohibited before that '++' (ctx:WxO)
ERROR: need consistent spacing around '+' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '<' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '<' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: need consistent spacing around '>>' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: "(foo*)" should be "(foo *)"
ERROR: "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar"
ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
WARNING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
WARNING: unnecessary whitespace before a quoted newline
WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
WARNING: please, no space before tabs
WARNING: Unnecessary space before function pointer arguments
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: I2d7e1a329c6b2e8ca9633a97b595566544d7fd33
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18862
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
It never made sense to have bootblock_* in init, but
pirq_routing.c in boot, and some ld scripts on the main
level while others live in subdirectories.
This patch flattens the directory hierarchy and makes
x86 more similar to the other architectures.
Change-Id: I4056038fe7813e4d3d3042c441e7ab6076a36384
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10901
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
