| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Rename coreboot_ram stage to ramstage. This is done in order to provide
consistency with other stage names (bootblock, romstage) and to allow any
Makefile rule generalization, required for patches to be submitted later.
Change-Id: Ib66e43b7e17b9c48b2d099670ba7e7d857673386
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5567
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
This framework was only available in ramstage. So we had to define
console output functions separately for bootblock, romstage and SMM.
Follow-up patches will re-enable all the consoles removed here,
in a more flexible fashion, and with less lines-of-code and copy-paste.
Also the driver list is not in a well-defined order and some of the
loops could exit without visiting all drivers.
NOTE: This build has no console in ramstage.
Change-Id: Iaddc495aaca37e2a6c2c3f802a0dba27bf227a3e
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5337
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
Many of the boot state callbacks can be scheduled at compile time.
Therefore, provide a way for a compilation unit to inform the
boot state machine when its callbacks should be called. Each C
module can export the callbacks and their scheduling requirements
without changing the shared boot flow code.
Change-Id: Ibc4cea4bd5ad45b2149c2d4aa91cbea652ed93ed
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3133
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Coreboot's ramstage defines certain sections/symbols in its fixed
static linker script. It uses these sections/symbols for locating the
drivers as well as its own program information. Add these sections
and symbols to the rmodule linker script so that ramstage can be
linked as an rmodule. These sections and symbols are a noop for other
rmodule-linked programs, but they are vital to the ramstage.
Also add a comment in coreboot_ram.ld to mirror any changes made there
to the rmodule linker script.
Change-Id: Ib9885a00e987aef0ee1ae34f1d73066e15bca9b1
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2786
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
|
|
In order to prepare the ramstage to be linked by the rmodule linker the
stack needs to be self-contained within the ramstage objects. The
reasoning is that the rmodule linker provides a way to define a heap,
but it doesn't currently have a region for the stack.
The downside to this is that memory footprint of the ramstage can change
when compared before this change. The size difference stems from the
link ordering of the objects as the stack is now defined within
c_start.S. The size fluctuation ranges from 0 to CONFIG_STACK_SIZE - 1
because of the previous behavior or aligning to CONFIG_STACK_SIZE. It
should be noted that such an alignment is unnecessary for 32-bit x86 as
the alignment requirement for the stacks are 4 byte alignment. Also the
memory footprint is still dominated by CONFIG_RAMTOP and CONFIG_RAMBASE.
Change-Id: I63a4ddd249104bc27aff2ab6b39fc6db12b54028
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2785
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
|
|
In order to provide some insight on what code is executed during
coreboot's run time and how well our test scenarios work, this
adds code coverage support to coreboot's ram stage. This should
be easily adaptable for payloads, and maybe even romstage.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Gcov.html for
more information.
To instrument coreboot, select CONFIG_COVERAGE ("Code coverage
support") in Kconfig, and recompile coreboot. coreboot will then
store its code coverage information into CBMEM, if possible.
Then, run "cbmem -CV" as root on the target system running the
instrumented coreboot binary. This will create a whole bunch of
.gcda files that contain coverage information. Tar them up, copy
them to your build system machine, and untar them. Then you can
use your favorite coverage utility (gcov, lcov, ...) to visualize
code coverage.
For a sneak peak of what will expect you, please take a look
at http://www.coreboot.org/~stepan/coreboot-coverage/
Change-Id: Ib287d8309878a1f5c4be770c38b1bc0bb3aa6ec7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2052
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
c_start.o has a special case in the build system, which we can
eliminate, somewhat simplifying the build.
To ensure that the entry point is at the beginning, introduce a
new section .textfirst that is placed appropriately. In principle
the ENTRY() definition in the linker script should be enough, but
better be safe.
Change-Id: I9737f7f5731e12ceb2119eb432b0e09832bc53fa
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1909
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
src/arch/x86.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coreboot.org>
Acked-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@6161 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
|
