| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
When we first added ARM support to coreboot, it was clear that the
bootblock would need to do vastly different tasks than on x86, so we
moved its main logic under arch/. Now that we have several more
architectures, it turns out (as with so many things lately) that x86 is
really the odd one out, and all the others are trying to do pretty much
the same thing. This has already caused maintenance issues as the ARM32
bootblock developed and less-mature architectures were left behind with
old cruft.
This patch tries to address that problem by centralizing that logic
under lib/ for use by all architectures/SoCs that don't explicitly
opt-out (with the slightly adapted existing BOOTBLOCK_CUSTOM option).
This works great out of the box for ARM32 and ARM64. It could probably
be easily applied to MIPS and RISCV as well, but I don't have any of
those boards to test so I'll mark them as BOOTBLOCK_CUSTOM for now and
leave that for later cleanup.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Built Jerry and Falco, booted Oak.
Change-Id: Ibbf727ad93651e388aef20e76f03f5567f9860cb
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12076
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
Commit 54229a7 (arm: Fix checkstack() to use correct stack size) didn't
quite hit the mark. Due to the crazy way our Kconfig includes work, It
accidentally set CONFIG_STACK_SIZE to 0 even on architectures that need
it.
This patch fixes the issue by moving everything back to a single entry
in src/Kconfig, making sure we end up with the intended numbers on all
architectures.
BRANCH=None
BUG=chrome-os-partner:34750
TEST=Built for Pinky, Urara, Falco and Ryu. Confirmed that the generated
.config contained CONFIG_STACK_SIZE=0x0 for the former two, and
CONFIG_STACK_SIZE=0x1000 for the latter.
Original-Change-Id: Ib18561925aafe7c74e6c4f0b10b55000a785e144
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/236753
Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c64b127e163f98162f3f7195b6ed09bd5a4b77c4)
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I2c747b04760bc97f43523596640bfb15317e5730
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9696
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <edward.ocallaghan@koparo.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
checkstack() runs at the end of ramstage to warn about stack overflows,
and it assumes that CONFIG_STACK_SIZE is always the size of the stack to
check. This is only true for systems that bring up multiprocessing in
ramstage and assign a separate stack for each core, like x86 and ARM64.
Other architectures like ARM and MIPS (for now) don't touch secondary
CPUs at all and currently don't look like they'll ever need to, so they
generally stay on the same (SRAM-based) stack they have been on since
their bootblock.
This patch tries to model that difference by making these architectures
explicitly set CONFIG_STACK_SIZE to zero, and using that as a cue to
assume the whole (_estack - _stack) area in checkstack() instead. Also
adds a BUG() to the stack overflow check, since that is currently just
as non-fatal as the BIOS_ERR message (despite the incorrect "SYSTEM
HALTED" output) but a little more easy to spot. Such a serious failure
should not drown out in all the normal random pieces of lower case boot
spam (also, I was intending to eventually have a look at assert() and
BUG() to hopefully make them a little more useful/noticeable if I ever
find the time for it).
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Booted Pinky, noticed it no longer complains about stack overflows.
Built Falco, Ryu and Urara.
Change-Id: I6826e0ec24201d4d83c5929b281828917bc9abf4
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 54229a725e8907b84a105c04ecea33b8f9b91dd4
Original-Change-Id: I49f70bb7ad192bd1c48e077802085dc5ecbfd58b
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/235894
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
With kconfig understanding wildcards, we don't need
Kconfig files that just include other Kconfig files
anymore.
Change-Id: I7584e675f78fcb4ff1fdb0731e340533c5bc040d
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9298
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I79b4969c34500fd51b1ce2ad751bc0723ee0afa2
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9147
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Iaf8167839f8506bd2ab08c2ba9f8317ba2437f28
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reported-by: Paul Menzel
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9054
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <edward.ocallaghan@koparo.com>
|
|
Add the build infrastructure and basic architectural support required
to build for targets using the MIPS architecture. This is sufficient
to run on a simulator, but will require the addition of some cache
maintenance and timer setup in order to run on real hardware.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:31438, chromium:409082
TEST=none yet
Change-Id: I027902d8408e419b626d0aab7768bc564bd49047
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: fcc0d934d7223922c878b1f87021cb5c2d7e6f21
Original-Change-Id: If4f99554463bd3760fc142477440326fd16c67cc
Original-Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Original-Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/207972
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8760
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
