| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
At least when building with the gnu toolchain, the headers the linker
automatically generate save space for the actual ELF headers in one of the
loadable segments. This creates two problems. First, the data you intended to
be at the start of the image doesn't actually show up there, it's actually the
ELF headers. Second, the ELF headers are essentially useless for firmware
since there's currently nothing to tell you where they are, and even if there
was, there isn't much of a reason to look at them. They're useful in userspace
for, for instance, the dynamic linker, but not really in firmware.
This change adds a PHDRS construct to each of the linker scripts used on ARM
which define a single segment called to_load which does not have the flag set
which would tell the linker to put headers in it. The first section defined in
the script has ": to_load" to tell the linker which segment to put it in, and
from that point on the other sections go in there by default.
Change-Id: I24b721eb436d17afd234002ae82f9166d2fcf65d
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3580
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Not all ARM systems need "BL1", and the layout of BL* and bootblock may be
different (ex, Exynos 5250 may use a new BL1 with variable length checksum
header).
To support that better, define the real base address (and ROM offset) of boot
block, and then we can post-processing ROM image file by filling data / checksum
and any other information.
Change-Id: I0e3105e52500b6b457371ad33a9aa546acf28928
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3664
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
In the file `COPYING` in the coreboot repository and upstream [1]
just one space is used.
The following command was used to convert all files.
$ git grep -l 'MA 02' | xargs sed -i 's/MA 02/MA 02/'
[1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt
Change-Id: Ic956dab2820a9e2ccb7841cab66966ba168f305f
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2490
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com>
|
|
This places the .id section toward the lower region of the coreboot
image, before the bootblock. It's easier for humans to find by dumping
the image and it also eliminates ID_SECTION_OFFSET which is currently
the upper bound on our image size.
Change-Id: I7d737b901dac659ddf9aa437cee5dc32f1080546
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2345
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
This adds a .bl1 and .start symbol that is placed at the beginning
of the .rom section.
The goal is to move the .id section in between the reset vector and
bootblock_main.
Change-Id: Ie732ce656d697c059cc0fa40c844b39f53fc214c
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2344
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
The Kconfig variable indicates KB, but the number used was bytes.
Let's just assume KB is correct for now.
Change-Id: I910c126104f0222fc48b70a18df943f2afddeca3
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2341
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
This adds a BL1_SIZE_KB config variable so that we can get rid of
some magic constants.
Change-Id: I9dbcfb407d3f8e367be5d943e95b032ce88b0ad0
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2332
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
This lays out the groundwork for using a proper bootblock on ARM.
Currently we bypass the bootblock entirely and go straight to
romstage. However we want to utilize CBFS to maximize flexibility
of placing code without relying on a lot of magic numbers which
will break depending on the SoC in use.
Change-Id: I9cc2a8191d2db38b27b6363ba673e5a360de9684
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2118
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
