| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The ARM Makefile was copied from x86 and then modified, and as a result it
was carrying a lot of baggage. On top of that, the extra complication made it
inflexible, and we need a lot of flexiblity in order to support the fact that
the Tegra124 starts on an ARMv4 coprocessor instead of one of the ARMv7 main
CPUs.
Change-Id: Ia6ddc27619bdb51e152ad0c628ad6f3037c103ce
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171017
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 512d942788336c8d52470135b43ee4e6a1c95f6c)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6709
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
|
|
This patch enhances the armv7 exception handlers in Coreboot and
libpayload to show the correct SP and LR registers from the aborted
context, and also dump a part of the current stack. Since we cannot
access the banked registers of SVC mode from a different exception mode,
it changes Coreboot (and its payloads) to run in System mode instead. As
both modes can execute all privileged instructions, this should not have
any noticeable effect on firmware operation (please correct me if I'm
wrong!).
Change-Id: I0e04f47619e55308f7da4a3a99c9cae6ae35cc30
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170045
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit d0db2f5e938200e3f5899c5e1f1606ab2dd5b334)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6538
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
On x86, cpu_info lives at the top of stack. Make the arm do that as
well, as the threading model needs that and so will multicore support.
As part of this change, make the stack size a power of 2.
Also make it much smaller -- 2048 bytes is PLENTY for ram stage.
Note that the small stack size is counterintuitive for rom stage. How
can this work in rom stage, which needs a HUGE stack for lzma? The
main use of STACK_SIZE has always been in ram stage; since 2002 or so
it was to size per-core stacks (see, e.g.,
src/arch/x86/lib/c_start.S:.space CONFIG_MAX_CPUS*CONFIG_STACK_SIZE
and, more recently, thread stacks. So, we define the STACK_TOP for rom
and ram stage, but the STACK_SIZE has no real effect on the ROM stage
(no hardware red zones on the stack) and hence we're ok with actually
defining the "wrong" stack size. In fact, the coreboot_ram ldscript
for armv7 sizes the stack by subtracting CONFIG_STACK_BOTTOM from
CONFIG_STACK_TOP, so we replicate that arithmetic in bootblock.inc
Observed stack usage in ramstage:
BS: BS_PAYLOAD_LOAD times (us): entry 1 run 153887 exit 1
Jumping to boot code at 23104044
CPU0: stack: 02072800 - 02073000, lowest used address 020728d4, stack used: 1836 bytes
entry = 23104044
Which means we do need 2K, not 1K.
Change-Id: I1a21db87081597efe463095bfd33c89eba1d569f
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/66135
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit f011097e9f2bfb2f4c1109d465be89a79a65ba3e)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6501
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Not all ARM systems need "BL1", and the layout of BL* and bootblock may be
different (ex, Exynos 5250 may use a new BL1 with variable length checksum
header).
To support that better, define the real base address (and ROM offset) of boot
block, and then we can post-processing ROM image file by filling data / checksum
and any other information.
Change-Id: I0e3105e52500b6b457371ad33a9aa546acf28928
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3664
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This gets rid of the clock-tick based sdelay in favor of udelay().
udelay() is more consistent and easier to work with, and this allows
us to carry one less variation of timers (and headers and sources...).
Every 1 unit in the sdelay() argument was assumed to cause a delay of
2 clock ticks (@1.7GHz). So the conversion factor is roughly:
sdelay(N) = udelay(((N * 2) / 1.7 * 10^9) * 10^6)
= udelay((N * 2) / (1.7 * 10^3))
The sdelay() periods used were:
sdelay(100) --> udelay(1)
sdelay(0x10000) --> udelay(78) (rounded up to udelay(100))
There was one instance of sdelay(10000), which looked like sort of a
typo since sdelay(0x10000) was used elsewhere. sdelay(10000) should
approximate to about 12us, so we'll stick with that for now and leave
a note.
Change-Id: I5e7407865ceafa701eea1d613bbe50cf4734f33e
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3079
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
It's better to recognize aborts when they occur than to mask them to
discover them later without knowing where they actually came from.
Change-Id: Ic8f5321415f411afac94b5ef9dd440790df6d82c
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3065
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
This adds condition codes when using the msr instruction. Although
described as "optional" in the Cortex-A series programmer's guide,
our experience with using the msr instruction in the payload suggests
that the condition code is not optional and that this only worked
in coreboot (and u-boot) because the processor comes up in SVC32 mode.
(credit to Gabe Black for finding this, I'm only uploading the patch)
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I0aa4715ae415e1ccc5719b7b55adcd527cc1597b
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3037
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
For whatever reason tabs got inserted in the license header text.
Remove one occurrence of that with the following command [1].
$ git grep -l 'MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.'$'\t' | xargs sed -i 's,MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.[ ]*,MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.\ \ ,'
[1] http://sed.sourceforge.net/grabbag/tutorials/sedfaq.txt
Change-Id: Iaf4ed32c32600c3b23c08f8754815b959b304882
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2460
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Jens Rottmann <JRottmann@LiPPERTembedded.de>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Măgherușan-Stanciu <cristi.magherusan@gmail.com>
|
|
This adds a simple loop which initializes the stack to 0xdeadbeef
which is used by checkstack().
Change-Id: I8aecf7bfb1067de68c4080c1fcb7eefa28fd04a7
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2421
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
This patch fixes up the usage of stack pointer and regions.
The current approach only works by coincidence, so this fixes a few
things at once to get it into a working state and allow us to use
checkstack() again:
- Add a STACK_SIZE Kconfig variable. Earlier on it was evaluated to 0.
- Assign _stack and _estack using CPU-specific Kconfig variables since
it may reside elsewhere in memory (not necessarily DRAM).
- Make the existing IRAM stack variables more useful in this context.
Change-Id: I4ca5b5680c9ea7e26b1b2b6b3890e028188b51c2
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2416
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
This adds a .bl1 and .start symbol that is placed at the beginning
of the .rom section.
The goal is to move the .id section in between the reset vector and
bootblock_main.
Change-Id: Ie732ce656d697c059cc0fa40c844b39f53fc214c
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2344
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
The Kconfig variable indicates KB, but the number used was bytes.
Let's just assume KB is correct for now.
Change-Id: I910c126104f0222fc48b70a18df943f2afddeca3
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2341
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
This adds a BL1_SIZE_KB config variable so that we can get rid of
some magic constants.
Change-Id: I9dbcfb407d3f8e367be5d943e95b032ce88b0ad0
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2332
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch does a few things to get us into romstage:
- Add romstage as a stage (a later patch adds it as a binary, which
is probably wrong). The Makefile magic is complex enough that we
let it build the XIP file for now, but we no longer use it.
- Replace findstage with loadstage. Loadstage will find a stage,
load the code to memory, and zero the remaining part of memory.
Now we can link the romstage to go anywhere!
- Eliminate magic offsets from code/ldscripts and centralize Kconfig
variables in src/cpu/samsung/exynos5250/Kconfig.
- Tidy up code and serial output
Change-Id: Iae4d2f9e7f429cb1df15d49daf9a08b88d75d79d
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2174
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
We've had obscure errors as the size of the bootblock changes.
This fix allows us to use a 32-bit constant. Please test on
real hardware before you ack.
Change-Id: Ic3d9f4763554bd6104ae9c4ce5bbacd17b40872c
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2168
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
This replaces hard-coded bootblock offsets using the new scheme.
The assembler will place the initial branch instruction after BL1,
skip 2 aligned chunks, and place the remaining bootblock code after.
It will also leave an anchor string, currently 0xdeadbeef which
cbfstool will find. Once found, cbfstool will place the master CBFS
header at the next aligned offset.
Here is how it looks:
0x0000 |--------------|
| BL1 |
0x2000 |--------------|
| branch |
0x2000 + align |--------------|
| CBFS header |
0x2000 + align * 2 |--------------|
| bootblock |
|--------------|
TODO: The option for alignment passed into cbfstool has always been
64. Can we set it to 16 instead?
Change-Id: Icbe817cbd8a37f11990aaf060aab77d2dc113cb1
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2148
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
This lays out the groundwork for using a proper bootblock on ARM.
Currently we bypass the bootblock entirely and go straight to
romstage. However we want to utilize CBFS to maximize flexibility
of placing code without relying on a lot of magic numbers which
will break depending on the SoC in use.
Change-Id: I9cc2a8191d2db38b27b6363ba673e5a360de9684
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2118
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Also, remove unnecessary junk and prepare for future build changes.
Change-Id: I143777ec7e67ea4d6fed00084aafcb94c7866b4d
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2141
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
