summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/arch/arm64/boot.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-02-22die() when attempting to use bounce buffer on non-i386.Vladimir Serbinenko
Only i386 has code to support bounce buffer. For others coreboot would silently discard part of binary which doesn't work and is a hell to debug. Instead just die. Change-Id: I37ae24ea5d13aae95f9856a896700a0408747233 Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13750 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2016-02-10arch/arm64: Use correct SPSR.DAIF mask for BL31 and payloadJulius Werner
The PSTATE mask bits for Debug exceptions, external Aborts, Interrupts and Fast interrupts are usually best left unset: under normal circumstances none of those exceptions should occur in firmware, and if they do it's better to get a crash close to the code that caused it (rather than much later when the kernel first unmasks them). For this reason arm64_cpu_init unmasks them right after boot. However, the EL2 payload was still running with all mask bits set, which this patch fixes. BL31, on the other hand, explicitly wants to be entered with all masks set (see calling convention in docs/firmware-design.md), which we had previously not been doing. It doesn't seem to make a difference at the moment, but since it's explicitly specified we should probably comply. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Booted Oak, confirmed with raw_read_daif() in payload that mask bits are now cleared. Change-Id: I04406da4c435ae7d44e2592c41f9807934bbc802 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 6ba55bc23fbde962d91c87dc0f982437572a69a8 Original-Change-Id: Ic5fbdd4e1cd7933c8b0c7c5fe72eac2022c9553c Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/325056 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13596 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-12-10lib: remove assets infrastructureAaron Durbin
Now that only CBFS access is supported for finding resources within the boot media the assets infrastructure can be removed. Remove it. BUG=chromium:445938 BRANCH=None TEST=Built and ran on glados. Change-Id: I383fd6579280cf9cfe5a18c2851baf74cad004e9 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12690 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-11-17arm64: tegra132: tegra210: Remove old arm64/stage_entry.SJulius Werner
This patch removes the old arm64/stage_entry.S code that was too specific to the Tegra SoC boot flow, and replaces it with code that hides the peculiarities of switching to a different CPU/arch in ramstage in the Tegra SoC directories. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built Ryu and Smaug. !!!UNTESTED!!! Change-Id: Ib3a0448b30ac9c7132581464573efd5e86e03698 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12078 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2015-11-16arm64: Implement generic stage transitions for non-Tegra SoCsJulius Werner
The existing arm64 architecture code has been developed for the Tegra132 and Tegra210 SoCs, which only start their ARM64 cores in ramstage. It interweaves the stage entry point with code that initializes a CPU (and should not be run again if that CPU already ran a previous stage). It also still contains some vestiges of SMP/secmon support (such as setting up stacks in the BSS instead of using the stage-peristent one from memlayout). This patch splits those functions apart and makes the code layout similar to how things work on ARM32. The default stage_entry() symbol is a no-op wrapper that just calls main() for the current stage, for the normal case where a stage ran on the same core as the last one. It can be overridden by SoC code to support special cases like Tegra. The CPU initialization code is split out into armv8/cpu.S (similar to what arm_init_caches() does for ARM32) and called by the default bootblock entry code. SoCs where a CPU starts up in a later stage can call the same code from a stage_entry() override instead. The Tegra132 and Tegra210 code is not touched by this patch to make it easier to review and validate. A follow-up patch will bring those SoCs in line with the model. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Booted Oak with a single mmu_init()/mmu_enable(). Built Ryu and Smaug. Change-Id: I28302a6ace47e8ab7a736e089f64922cef1a2f93 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12077 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2015-11-07arm64: remove spin table supportAaron Durbin
As ARM Trusted Firmware is the only first class citizen for booting arm64 multi-processor in coreboot remove spintable support. If SoCs want to bring up MP then ATF needs to be ported and integrated. Change-Id: I1f38b8d8b0952eee50cc64440bfd010b1dd0bff4 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11908 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2015-11-07arm64: remove secmonAaron Durbin
It's been decided to only support ARM Trusted Firmware for any EL3 monitor. That means any SoC that requires PSCI needs to add its support for ATF otherwise multi-processor bring up won't work. Change-Id: Ic931dbf5eff8765f4964374910123a197148f0ff Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11897 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2015-10-31tree: drop last paragraph of GPL copyright headerPatrick Georgi
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address. Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we imported) looks out for that. This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further editing. Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2015-06-02assets: abstract away the firmware assets used for bootingAaron Durbin
As there can be more than one source of firmware assets this patch generalizes the notion of locating a particular asset. struct asset is added along with some helper functions for working on assets as a first class citizen. Change-Id: I2ce575d1e5259aed4c34c3dcfd438abe9db1d7b9 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10264 Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2015-05-21Remove address from GPLv2 headersPatrick Georgi
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons but because there are tools that look for them, and giving them a standard pattern simplifies things. However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a new lease, but can drop the address instead. util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that we may want to synchronize every now and then. $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -a \! -name \*.patch \ -a \! -name \*_shipped \ -a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \ -a \! -name LGPL.txt \ -a \! -name COPYING \ -a \! -name DISCLAIMER \ -exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
2015-05-19arm64: Make SPSR exception masking on EL2 transition explicitJulius Werner
The configuration of SPSR bits that mask processor exceptions is kinda oddly hidden as an implict part of the transition() function right now. It would be odd but not impossible for programs to want to be entered with enabled exceptions, so let's move these bits to be explicitly set by the caller like the rest of SPSR instead. Also clear up some macro names. The SPSR[I] bit is currently defined as SPSR_IRQ_ENABLE, which is particularly unfortunate since that bit actually *disables* (masks) interrupts. The fact that there is an additional SPSR_IRQ_MASK definition with the same value but a different purpose doesn't really help. There's rarely a point to have all three of xxx_SHIFT, xxx_MASK and xxx_VALUE macros for single-bit fields, so simplify this to a single definition per bit. (Other macros in lib_helpers.h should probably also be overhauled to conform, but I want to wait and see how many of them really stay relevant after upcoming changes first.) BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=None Change-Id: Id126f70d365467e43b7f493c341542247e5026d2 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 715600c83aef9794d1674e8c3b62469bdc57f297 Original-Change-Id: I3edc4ee276feb8610a636ec7b4175706505d58bd Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/270785 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10250 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-05-19arm64: Add support for using ARM Trusted Firmware as secure monitorJulius Werner
This patch adds support for integrating the runtime-resident component of ARM Trusted Firmware (github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware) called BL31. It expects the ARM TF source tree to be checked out under $(top)/3rdparty/arm-trusted-firmware, which will be set up in a later patch. Also include optional support for VBOOT2 verification (pretty hacky for now, since CBFSv1 is just around the corner and will make all this so much better). BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Booted Oak with ARM TF and working PSCI (with additional platform patches). Change-Id: I8c923226135bdf88a9a30a7f5ff163510c35608d Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: a1b3b2d56b25bfc1f3b2d19bf7876205075a987a Original-Change-Id: I0714cc10b5b10779af53ecbe711ceeb89fb30da2 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/270784 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10249 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-05-19arm64: Reorganize payload entry code and related KconfigsJulius Werner
This patch slightly reorganizes arm64/boot.c with the aim of being more readable: Make more obvious that there's no code execution here after payload_entry. [pg: taken from patch linked below] Change-Id: Ia341e5d290b10ad5ba3edb349b8a7f619022d99f Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 5067e47bc03f04ad2dba044f022716e0fc62bb9e Original-Change-Id: I1b2038acc0d054716a3c580ce97ea8e9a45abfa2 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/270783 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10247 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-05-19arm64: Reorganize payload entry code and related KconfigsJulius Werner
This patch slightly reorganizes arm64/boot.c with the aim of being more readable: we need to sync the i-cache in both code paths, so do it in a single location. [pg: taken from patch linked below] Change-Id: Iab173acfc6d66e4dccb6f6ab916aea2007632bfd Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 5067e47bc03f04ad2dba044f022716e0fc62bb9e Original-Change-Id: I1b2038acc0d054716a3c580ce97ea8e9a45abfa2 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/270783 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10246 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-05-19arm64: Reorganize payload entry code and related KconfigsJulius Werner
This patch slightly reorganizes arm64/boot.c with the aim of being more readable: Make spintable handling optional through a kconfig flag. [pg: taken from patch linked below] Change-Id: I64610640835473fcc3d9eff01feb5f861b753eb8 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 5067e47bc03f04ad2dba044f022716e0fc62bb9e Original-Change-Id: I1b2038acc0d054716a3c580ce97ea8e9a45abfa2 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/270783 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10245 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-05-19arm64: Reorganize payload entry code and related KconfigsJulius Werner
This patch slightly reorganizes arm64/boot.c with the aim of being more readable. Improve locality of code. [pg: taken from patch linked below] Change-Id: Ie9ea6a10b9d5e5c33bf020369afcae4f10ef068e Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 5067e47bc03f04ad2dba044f022716e0fc62bb9e Original-Change-Id: I1b2038acc0d054716a3c580ce97ea8e9a45abfa2 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/270783 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10244 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-05-19arm64: Reorganize payload entry code and related KconfigsJulius Werner
This patch slightly reorganizes arm64/boot.c with the aim of being more readable: the secure monitor entry is now guarded by an explicit if statement for its Kconfig rather than hiding than in the corresponding header file. This makes it clear that there are two (soon three) separate code paths here. Change-Id: I44993da7a982b08f485b93ffc522d193bb3fa118 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 5067e47bc03f04ad2dba044f022716e0fc62bb9e Original-Change-Id: I1b2038acc0d054716a3c580ce97ea8e9a45abfa2 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/270783 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10243 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-04-06arch/arm64/boot.c: Only return if condition is metPaul Menzel
Fix up commit b3847e64 (program loading: add prog_run() function), which misses the braces for the if statement, causing the function also to return if a non-payload program should be run causing the rest of the stages never to be run. Change-Id: I04940b218ba71e82af769c8db574528f830d0cbb Found-by: Coverity, CID 1293136: Control flow issues (NESTING_INDENT_MISMATCH) Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9306 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2015-04-03program loading: unify on struct progAaron Durbin
Instead of having different structures for loading ramstage and payload align to using struct prog. This also removes arch_payload_run() in favor of the prog_run() interface. Change-Id: I31483096094eacc713a7433811cd69cc5621c43e Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8849 Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
2015-04-03program loading: add prog_run() functionAaron Durbin
The prog_run() function abstracts away what is required for running a given program. Within it, there are 2 calls: 1. platform_prog_run() and 2. arch_prog_run(). The platform_prog_run() allows for a chipset to intercept a program that will be run. This allows for CPU switching as currently needed in t124 and t132. Change-Id: I22a5dd5bfb1018e7e46475e47ac993a0941e2a8c Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8846 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
2015-04-03program loading: introduce struct progAaron Durbin
The struct prog serves as way to consolidate program loading. This abstraction can be used to perform more complicated execution paths such as running a program on a separate CPU after it has been loaded. Currently t124 and t132 need to do that in the boot path. Follow on patches will allow the platform to decide how to execute a particular program. Note: the vboot path is largely untouched because it's already broken in the coreboot.org tree. After getting all the necessary patches pushed then vboot will be fixed. Change-Id: Ic6e6fe28c5660fb41edee5fd8661eaf58222f883 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8839 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
2015-03-28arm64: add spin table supportAaron Durbin
There was a hacky and one-off spin table support in tegra132. Make this support generic for all arm64 chips. BUG=chrome-os-partner:32082 BRANCH=None TEST=Ran with and without secure monitor booting smp into the kernel. Change-Id: I3425ab0c30983d4c74d0aa465dda38bb2c91c83b Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 024dc3f3e5262433a56ed14934db837b5feb1748 Original-Change-Id: If12083a9afc3b2be663d36cfeed10f9b74bae3c8 Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/218654 Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9084 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-03-28arm64: Add support for secure monitorFurquan Shaikh
Secure monitor runs at EL3 and is responsible for jumping to the payload at specified EL and also to manage features like PSCI. Adding basic implementation of secure monitor as a rmodule. Currently, it just jumps to the the payload at current EL. Support for switching el and PSCI will be added as separate patches. CQ-DEPEND=CL:218300 BUG=chrome-os-partner:30785 BRANCH=None TEST=Compiles succesfully and secure monitor loads and runs payload on ryu Change-Id: If0f22299a9bad4e93311154e5546f5bae3f3395c Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 5e40a21115aeac1cc3c73922bdc3e42d4cdb7d34 Original-Change-Id: I86d5e93583afac141ff61475bd05c8c82d17d926 Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/214371 Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9080 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-03-28arm64: Switch to EL2 for libpayload jumpFurquan Shaikh
CQ-DEPEND=CL:216826,CL:218300 BUG=chrome-os-partner:31634 BRANCH=None TEST=Compiles successfully and we are able to start execution of libpayload in EL2 and reach kernel login prompt Change-Id: I233f9867470a4723f320dc0dcaa670a56dcf0f5d Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 169948a2afeeb7848daeb37600963bd503527f1a Original-Change-Id: I336d73085f08ca03e533555a10b88f20d74b4347 Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/217826 Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9074 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-03-20loaders: add program_loading.h header fileAaron Durbin
Instead of two headers for payload and ramstage loading combine the 2 files into one. This also allows for easier refactoring by keeping header files consistent. Change-Id: I4a6dffb78ad84c78e6e96c886d361413f9b4a17d Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8708 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2015-01-26arm64: Prepare ARM64 for buildingMarc Jones
There were a number of issues with the ARM64 build files. This patch ports the following changes from ARMV4/V7 to ARMV8: - make armv8 Kconfig options consistent with armv4/v7 - fix build include issues in boot.c, tables.c, and early_variables.h by matching armv4/v7. Change-Id: I57359a96821d88c50f48dc0bb6ad226cacb0c2ec Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: Iacd95d336559c45458784d1da67bde62a0956620 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8236 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-09-23coreboot arm64: Add support for arm64 into coreboot frameworkFurquan Shaikh
Add support for enabling different coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) to have arm64 architecture. Most of the files have been copied over from arm/ or arm64-generic work. Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/197397 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 033ba96516805502673ac7404bc97e6ce4e2a934) This patch is essentially a squash of aarch64 changes made by these patches: d955885 coreboot: Rename coreboot_ram stage to ramstage a492761 cbmem console: Locate the preram console with a symbol instead of a sect 96e7f0e aarch64: Enable early icache and migrate SCTLR from EL3 3f854dc aarch64: Pass coreboot table in jmp_to_elf_entry ab3ecaf aarch64/foundation-armv8: Set up RAM area and enter ramstage 25fd2e9 aarch64: Remove CAR definitions from early_variables.h 65bf77d aarch64/foundation-armv8: Enable DYNAMIC_CBMEM 9484873 aarch64: Change default exception level to EL2 7a152c3 aarch64: Fix formatting of exception registers dump 6946464 aarch64: Implement basic exception handling c732a9d aarch64/foundation-armv8: Basic bootblock implementation 3bc412c aarch64: Comment out some parts of code to allow build ab5be71 Add initial aarch64 support The ramstage support is the only portion that has been tested on actual hardware. Bootblock and romstage support may require modifications to run on hardware. Change-Id: Icd59bec55c963a471a50e30972a8092e4c9d2fb2 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6915 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>