| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Fix up commit b3847e64 (program loading: add prog_run() function),
which misses the braces for the if statement, causing the function
also to return if a non-payload program should be run causing the rest
of the stages never to be run.
Change-Id: I04940b218ba71e82af769c8db574528f830d0cbb
Found-by: Coverity, CID 1293136: Control flow issues (NESTING_INDENT_MISMATCH)
Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9306
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
|
|
Instead of having different structures for loading
ramstage and payload align to using struct prog.
This also removes arch_payload_run() in favor of
the prog_run() interface.
Change-Id: I31483096094eacc713a7433811cd69cc5621c43e
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8849
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
|
|
The prog_run() function abstracts away what is required
for running a given program. Within it, there are 2
calls: 1. platform_prog_run() and 2. arch_prog_run().
The platform_prog_run() allows for a chipset to intercept
a program that will be run. This allows for CPU switching
as currently needed in t124 and t132.
Change-Id: I22a5dd5bfb1018e7e46475e47ac993a0941e2a8c
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8846
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
|
|
The struct prog serves as way to consolidate program
loading. This abstraction can be used to perform more
complicated execution paths such as running a program
on a separate CPU after it has been loaded. Currently
t124 and t132 need to do that in the boot path. Follow
on patches will allow the platform to decide how to
execute a particular program.
Note: the vboot path is largely untouched because it's
already broken in the coreboot.org tree. After getting
all the necessary patches pushed then vboot will be
fixed.
Change-Id: Ic6e6fe28c5660fb41edee5fd8661eaf58222f883
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8839
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
|
|
There was a hacky and one-off spin table support in tegra132.
Make this support generic for all arm64 chips.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:32082
BRANCH=None
TEST=Ran with and without secure monitor booting smp into the kernel.
Change-Id: I3425ab0c30983d4c74d0aa465dda38bb2c91c83b
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 024dc3f3e5262433a56ed14934db837b5feb1748
Original-Change-Id: If12083a9afc3b2be663d36cfeed10f9b74bae3c8
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/218654
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9084
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Secure monitor runs at EL3 and is responsible for jumping to the payload at
specified EL and also to manage features like PSCI.
Adding basic implementation of secure monitor as a rmodule. Currently, it just
jumps to the the payload at current EL. Support for switching el and PSCI will
be added as separate patches.
CQ-DEPEND=CL:218300
BUG=chrome-os-partner:30785
BRANCH=None
TEST=Compiles succesfully and secure monitor loads and runs payload on ryu
Change-Id: If0f22299a9bad4e93311154e5546f5bae3f3395c
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 5e40a21115aeac1cc3c73922bdc3e42d4cdb7d34
Original-Change-Id: I86d5e93583afac141ff61475bd05c8c82d17d926
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/214371
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9080
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
CQ-DEPEND=CL:216826,CL:218300
BUG=chrome-os-partner:31634
BRANCH=None
TEST=Compiles successfully and we are able to start execution of libpayload in
EL2 and reach kernel login prompt
Change-Id: I233f9867470a4723f320dc0dcaa670a56dcf0f5d
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 169948a2afeeb7848daeb37600963bd503527f1a
Original-Change-Id: I336d73085f08ca03e533555a10b88f20d74b4347
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/217826
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9074
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Instead of two headers for payload and ramstage loading
combine the 2 files into one. This also allows for easier
refactoring by keeping header files consistent.
Change-Id: I4a6dffb78ad84c78e6e96c886d361413f9b4a17d
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8708
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
There were a number of issues with the ARM64 build files. This
patch ports the following changes from ARMV4/V7 to ARMV8:
- make armv8 Kconfig options consistent with armv4/v7
- fix build include issues in boot.c, tables.c,
and early_variables.h by matching armv4/v7.
Change-Id: I57359a96821d88c50f48dc0bb6ad226cacb0c2ec
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Change-Id: Iacd95d336559c45458784d1da67bde62a0956620
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8236
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Add support for enabling different coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and
ramstage) to have arm64 architecture. Most of the files have been copied over
from arm/ or arm64-generic work.
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/197397
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 033ba96516805502673ac7404bc97e6ce4e2a934)
This patch is essentially a squash of aarch64 changes made by
these patches:
d955885 coreboot: Rename coreboot_ram stage to ramstage
a492761 cbmem console: Locate the preram console with a symbol instead of a sect
96e7f0e aarch64: Enable early icache and migrate SCTLR from EL3
3f854dc aarch64: Pass coreboot table in jmp_to_elf_entry
ab3ecaf aarch64/foundation-armv8: Set up RAM area and enter ramstage
25fd2e9 aarch64: Remove CAR definitions from early_variables.h
65bf77d aarch64/foundation-armv8: Enable DYNAMIC_CBMEM
9484873 aarch64: Change default exception level to EL2
7a152c3 aarch64: Fix formatting of exception registers dump
6946464 aarch64: Implement basic exception handling
c732a9d aarch64/foundation-armv8: Basic bootblock implementation
3bc412c aarch64: Comment out some parts of code to allow build
ab5be71 Add initial aarch64 support
The ramstage support is the only portion that has been tested
on actual hardware. Bootblock and romstage support may require
modifications to run on hardware.
Change-Id: Icd59bec55c963a471a50e30972a8092e4c9d2fb2
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6915
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
