| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Currently, arch/arm64 requires coreboot to run on EL3 due
to EL3 register access. This might be an issue when, for example,
one boots into TF-A first and drops into EL2 for coreboot afterwards.
This patch aims at making arch/arm64 more versatile by removing the
current EL3 constraint and allowing arm64 coreboot to run on EL1,
EL2 and EL3.
The strategy here, is to add a Kconfig option (ARM64_CURRENT_EL) which
lets us specify coreboot's EL upon entry. Based on that, we access the
appropriate ELx registers. So, for example, when running coreboot on
EL1, we would not access vbar_el3 or vbar_el2 but instead vbar_el1.
This way, we don't generate faults when accessing higher-EL registers.
Currently only tested on the qemu-aarch64 target. Exceptions were
tested by enabling FATAL_ASSERTS.
Signed-off-by: David Milosevic <David.Milosevic@9elements.com>
Change-Id: Iae1c57f0846c8d0585384f7e54102a837e701e7e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/74798
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
In case printk does not work the current exception handler will print a
simple "!" to notify the developer that coreboot is actually there but
something went wrong.
The "!" can be quite confusing when it actually happens that printk does
not work. Since "!" doesn't really say much (if you don't know the
exception arm64 code) the developer (like me) can easily assume that
something went wrong while configuring clocks or baud rate of UART,
since the output seemingly does not seem to make sense.
This adds a little bit more output to assure the developer that what was
printed was actually intended to be printed. Therefore it prints
"EXCEPT" which assures the developer that this was intended output.
It also adds a comment above so that developer can more easily grep
for this message.
It has intentionally not been written as:
```
const char *msg = "\r\n!EXCPT!";
while (*msg)
__uart_tx_byte(*msg++);
```
because in this case the compiler will generate code that will place
`msg` somewhere in bootblock and the code will try to access this using
a memory address. In rare cases (if you link bootblock at the wrong
address) this memory address can be wrong and coreboot will not print
the message. Using individual calls to `__uart_tx_byte` ensures that the
compiler will generate code which directly puts the character bytes into
the argument register without referencing a variable in bootblock.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Brune <maximilian.brune@9elements.com>
Change-Id: I2f858730469fff3cae120fd7c32fec53b3d309ca
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80184
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ic52f01d1d5d86334e0fd639b968b5eed43a35f1d
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/77633
Reviewed-by: Eric Lai <eric_lai@quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic4ce44865544c94c39e8582780a7eca7876f5c38
Signed-off-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/68370
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic86d2e6ad00cf190a2a728280f1a738486cb18c8
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44591
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
<types.h> is supposed to provide <commonlib/bsd/cb_err.h>,
<stdbool.h>,<stdint.h> and <stddef.h>. So remove those includes
each time when <types.h> is included.
Change-Id: I886f02255099f3005852a2e6095b21ca86a940ed
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41817
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Stefan thinks they don't add value.
Command used:
sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool)
The exceptions are for:
- crossgcc (patch file)
- gcov (imported from gcc)
- elf.h (imported from GNU's libc)
- nvramtool (more complicated header)
The removed lines are:
- fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */")
-# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available
-/* This file is part of coreboot */
-# This file is part of msrtool.
-/* This file is part of msrtool. */
- * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in
-/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */
- * This file is part of the coreboot project.
- /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-## This file is part of the coreboot project.
--- This file is part of the coreboot project.
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project */
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-;## This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the
- * This file is part of the coreinfo project.
-## This file is part of the coreinfo project.
- * This file is part of the depthcharge project.
-/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */
-/* This file is part of the ectool project. */
- * This file is part of the GNU C Library.
- * This file is part of the libpayload project.
-## This file is part of the libpayload project.
-/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */
-## This file is part of the superiotool project.
-/* This file is part of the superiotool project */
-/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */
Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I6374bc2d397800d574c7a0cc44079c09394a0673
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37984
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This also drops individual copyright notices, all mentioned authors in
that part of the tree are already listed in AUTHORS.
Change-Id: Ic5eddc961d015328e5a90994b7963e7af83cddd3
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39279
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Over time our printk() seems to acquire more and more features... which
is nice, but it also makes it a little less robust when something goes
wrong. If the wrong global is trampled by some buffer overflow, it
suddenly doesn't print anymore. It would be nice to have at least some
way to tell that we triggered a real exception in that case.
With this patch, arm64 exceptions will print a '!' straight to the UART
before trying any of the more fancy printk() stuff. It's not much but it
should tell the difference between an exception and a hang and hopefully
help someone dig in the right direction sooner. This violates loglevels
(which is part of the point), but presumably when you have a fatal
exception you shouldn't care about that anymore.
Change-Id: I3b08ab86beaee55263786011caa5588d93bbc720
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37465
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
To avoid trampling over interesting exception artifacts on the real
stack, our arm64 systems switch to a separate exception stack when
entering an exception handler. We don't want that to use up too much
SRAM so we just set it to 512 bytes. I mean it just prints a bunch of
registers, how much stack could it need, right?
Quite a bit it turns out. The whole vtxprintf() call stack goes pretty
deep, and aarch64 generally seems to be very generous with stack space.
Just the varargs handling seems to require 128 bytes for some reason,
and the other stuff adds up too. In the end the current implementation
takes 1008 bytes, so bump the exception stack size to 2K to make sure it
fits.
Change-Id: I910be4c5f6b29fae35eb53929c733a1bd4585377
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37464
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
|
|
As discussed on the mailing list and voted upon, the coreboot project
is going to move the majority of copyrights out of the headers and into
an AUTHORS file. This will happen a bit at a time, as we'll be unifying
license headers at the same time.
Additional changes in this patch:
- Make sure files say that they're part of the coreboot project
- Move descriptions below the license header
Note that the file include/arch/acpi.h is a fantastic example of why
moving to the authors file is needed. Excluding the guard statements,
it has 8 lines of copyrights for 3 function declarations.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: I334baab2b4311eb1bd9ce3f67f49a68e8b73630c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34606
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch is a raw application of
find src/ -type f | xargs sed -i -e 's/IS_ENABLED\s*(CONFIG_/CONFIG(/g'
Change-Id: I6262d6d5c23cabe23c242b4f38d446b74fe16b88
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31774
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Accesses to architectural registers should be really fast -- they're
just registers, after all. In fact, the arm64 architecture uses them for
some timing-senstive uses like the architectural timer. A read should be:
one instruction, no data dependencies, done.
However, our current coreboot framework wraps each of these accesses
into a separate function. Suddenly you have to spill registers on a
stack, make a function call, move your stack pointer, etc. When running
without MMU this adds a significant enough delay to cause timing
problems when bitbanging a UART on SDM845.
This patch replaces all those existing functions with static inline
definitions in the header so they will get reduced to a single
instruction as they should be. Also use some macros to condense the code
a little since they're all so regular, which should make it easier to
add more in the future. This patch also expands all the data types to
uint64_t since that's what the actual assembly instruction accesses,
even if the register itself only has 32 bits (the others will be ignored
by the processor and set to 0 on read). Arm regularly expands registers
as they add new bit fields to them with newer iterations of the
architecture anyway, so this just prepares us for the inevitable.
Change-Id: I2c41cc3ce49ee26bf12cd34e3d0509d8e61ffc63
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27881
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
When we first created the arm64 port, we weren't quite sure whether
coreboot would always run in EL3 on all platforms. The AArch64 A.R.M.
technically considers this exception level optional, but in practice all
SoCs seem to support it. We have since accumulated a lot of code that
already hardcodes an implicit or explicit assumption of executing in EL3
somewhere, so coreboot wouldn't work on a system that tries to enter it
in EL1/2 right now anyway.
However, some of our low level support libraries (in particular those
for accessing architectural registers) still have provisions for
running at different exception levels built-in, and often use switch
statements over the current exception level to decide which register to
access. This includes an unnecessarily large amount of code for what
should be single-instruction operations and precludes further
optimization via inlining.
This patch removes any remaining code that dynamically depends on the
current exception level and makes the assumption that coreboot executes
at EL3 official. If this ever needs to change for a future platform, it
would probably be cleaner to set the expected exception level in a
Kconfig rather than always probing it at runtime.
Change-Id: I1a9fb9b4227bd15a013080d1c7eabd48515fdb67
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27880
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Some exceptions (like from calling a NULL function pointer) are easier
to narrow down with a dump of the call stack. Let's take a page out of
ARM32's book and add that feature to ARM64 as well. Also change the
output format to two register columns, to make it easier to fit a whole
exception dump on one screen.
Applying to both coreboot and libpayload and syncing the output format
between both back up.
Change-Id: I19768d13d8fa8adb84f0edda2af12f20508eb2db
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14931
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
This patch removes the old arm64/stage_entry.S code that was too
specific to the Tegra SoC boot flow, and replaces it with code that
hides the peculiarities of switching to a different CPU/arch in ramstage
in the Tegra SoC directories.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Built Ryu and Smaug. !!!UNTESTED!!!
Change-Id: Ib3a0448b30ac9c7132581464573efd5e86e03698
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12078
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
The existing arm64 architecture code has been developed for the Tegra132
and Tegra210 SoCs, which only start their ARM64 cores in ramstage. It
interweaves the stage entry point with code that initializes a CPU (and
should not be run again if that CPU already ran a previous stage). It
also still contains some vestiges of SMP/secmon support (such as setting
up stacks in the BSS instead of using the stage-peristent one from
memlayout).
This patch splits those functions apart and makes the code layout
similar to how things work on ARM32. The default stage_entry() symbol is
a no-op wrapper that just calls main() for the current stage, for the
normal case where a stage ran on the same core as the last one. It can
be overridden by SoC code to support special cases like Tegra.
The CPU initialization code is split out into armv8/cpu.S (similar to
what arm_init_caches() does for ARM32) and called by the default
bootblock entry code. SoCs where a CPU starts up in a later stage can
call the same code from a stage_entry() override instead.
The Tegra132 and Tegra210 code is not touched by this patch to make it
easier to review and validate. A follow-up patch will bring those SoCs
in line with the model.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Booted Oak with a single mmu_init()/mmu_enable(). Built Ryu and
Smaug.
Change-Id: I28302a6ace47e8ab7a736e089f64922cef1a2f93
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12077
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Compiles successfully, sp verified during exception
Change-Id: Idbeb93b1dbf163e2d86cd42369941ff98a3d2d9e
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: ca73b40f0248497143b6ab42bd0f5cc6cddf7713
Original-Change-Id: I38ee403200acb0e3d9015231c274568930b58987
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/283542
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Trybot-Ready: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10842
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
In order to build upon the arm64 exception handlers need
to be registered. This provides very basic support to
register a handler for a specific exception vector.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:30785
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted into kernel.
Change-Id: If046f0736765a2efeb23201c1d2d1f7f7db47dd2
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: a82e5e8d5900ebef16abdb68701be6beeb9ca13a
Original-Change-Id: I0f68a48101ff48d582f5422871b9e7e5164357e4
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/218650
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9088
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Transition library acts as a common interface for handling exceptions. The only
thing that needs to be implemented by exception.c is the exc_dispatch routine to
handle the exceptions as required.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:30785
BRANCH=None
TEST=Compiles successfully and exceptions are tested using test_exc
Change-Id: I90b4861909189adfe8449b9d4590965e6b743c00
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: b83c9404407dd4dd2dda4e4eaed0b443f0f58425
Original-Change-Id: Ibb643d7ea2f9aabbc66439549ea2168fd66ced5e
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/217143
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9071
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
exception_hwinit() provides a path for just setting the hardware
state. This allows for other CPUs but the boot CPU for setting up
the appropriate vector table.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:31545
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted to the kernel.
Change-Id: Ifd44ab697bce5cd351f05069519785dc80e2b866
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 76a1c9cb3df930b28469608ecb5c35be7ccdadd1
Original-Change-Id: Ib09c813b49a4f00daca0b53d9dca972251fcf476
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/214773
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9017
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
BUG=chrome-os-partner:31515
BRANCH=None
TEST=test_exception generates a page fault which is handled by the exception
handler and execution continues after eret from the exception
Change-Id: Ie550492d2ed21b2c3009b5627f1e1a37429e6af0
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: e29fe77745d10e840c02498e54a0c53835530e5e
Original-Change-Id: I29b7dabaece9b11a04ee3628d83513d30eb07b1d
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/213661
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9000
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Add support for enabling different coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and
ramstage) to have arm64 architecture. Most of the files have been copied over
from arm/ or arm64-generic work.
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/197397
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 033ba96516805502673ac7404bc97e6ce4e2a934)
This patch is essentially a squash of aarch64 changes made by
these patches:
d955885 coreboot: Rename coreboot_ram stage to ramstage
a492761 cbmem console: Locate the preram console with a symbol instead of a sect
96e7f0e aarch64: Enable early icache and migrate SCTLR from EL3
3f854dc aarch64: Pass coreboot table in jmp_to_elf_entry
ab3ecaf aarch64/foundation-armv8: Set up RAM area and enter ramstage
25fd2e9 aarch64: Remove CAR definitions from early_variables.h
65bf77d aarch64/foundation-armv8: Enable DYNAMIC_CBMEM
9484873 aarch64: Change default exception level to EL2
7a152c3 aarch64: Fix formatting of exception registers dump
6946464 aarch64: Implement basic exception handling
c732a9d aarch64/foundation-armv8: Basic bootblock implementation
3bc412c aarch64: Comment out some parts of code to allow build
ab5be71 Add initial aarch64 support
The ramstage support is the only portion that has been tested
on actual hardware. Bootblock and romstage support may require
modifications to run on hardware.
Change-Id: Icd59bec55c963a471a50e30972a8092e4c9d2fb2
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6915
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
