coreboot.git - my copy of coreboot

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2017-05-30	arm64: Align cache maintenance code with libpayload and ARM32	Julius Werner
	coreboot and libpayload currently use completely different code to perform a full cache flush on ARM64, with even different function names. The libpayload code is closely inspired by the ARM32 version, so for the sake of overall consistency let's sync coreboot to that. Also align a few other cache management details to work the same way as the corresponding ARM32 parts (such as only flushing but not invalidating the data cache after loading a new stage, which may have a small performance benefit). Change-Id: I9e05b425eeeaa27a447b37f98c0928fed3f74340 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19785 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2015-11-17	arm64: tegra132: tegra210: Remove old arm64/stage_entry.S	Julius Werner
	This patch removes the old arm64/stage_entry.S code that was too specific to the Tegra SoC boot flow, and replaces it with code that hides the peculiarities of switching to a different CPU/arch in ramstage in the Tegra SoC directories. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Built Ryu and Smaug. !!!UNTESTED!!! Change-Id: Ib3a0448b30ac9c7132581464573efd5e86e03698 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12078 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2015-11-16	arm64: Implement generic stage transitions for non-Tegra SoCs	Julius Werner
	The existing arm64 architecture code has been developed for the Tegra132 and Tegra210 SoCs, which only start their ARM64 cores in ramstage. It interweaves the stage entry point with code that initializes a CPU (and should not be run again if that CPU already ran a previous stage). It also still contains some vestiges of SMP/secmon support (such as setting up stacks in the BSS instead of using the stage-peristent one from memlayout). This patch splits those functions apart and makes the code layout similar to how things work on ARM32. The default stage_entry() symbol is a no-op wrapper that just calls main() for the current stage, for the normal case where a stage ran on the same core as the last one. It can be overridden by SoC code to support special cases like Tegra. The CPU initialization code is split out into armv8/cpu.S (similar to what arm_init_caches() does for ARM32) and called by the default bootblock entry code. SoCs where a CPU starts up in a later stage can call the same code from a stage_entry() override instead. The Tegra132 and Tegra210 code is not touched by this patch to make it easier to review and validate. A follow-up patch will bring those SoCs in line with the model. BRANCH=None BUG=None TEST=Booted Oak with a single mmu_init()/mmu_enable(). Built Ryu and Smaug. Change-Id: I28302a6ace47e8ab7a736e089f64922cef1a2f93 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12077 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2015-10-31	tree: drop last paragraph of GPL copyright header	Patrick Georgi
	It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address. Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we imported) looks out for that. This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further editing. Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2015-05-21	Remove address from GPLv2 headers	Patrick Georgi
	As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons but because there are tools that look for them, and giving them a standard pattern simplifies things. However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a new lease, but can drop the address instead. util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that we may want to synchronize every now and then. $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA[, ]02110-1301[, ]USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307[, ]USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -a \! -name \.patch \ -a \! -name \_shipped \ -a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \ -a \! -name LGPL.txt \ -a \! -name COPYING \ -a \! -name DISCLAIMER \ -exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
2015-04-27	arm64: introduce data cache ops by set/way to the level specified	Joseph Lo
	This patchs introduces level specific data cache maintenance operations to cache_helpers.S. It's derived form ARM trusted firmware repository. Please reference here. https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/ lib/aarch64/cache_helpers.S BRANCH=none BUG=none TEST=boot on smaug/foster Change-Id: Ib58a6d6f95eb51ce5d80749ff51d9d389b0d1343 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: b3d1a16bd0089740f1f2257146c771783beece82 Original-Change-Id: Ifcd1dbcd868331107d0d47af73545a3a159fdff6 Original-Signed-off-by: Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/265826 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9979 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
2014-09-23	coreboot arm64: Add support for arm64 into coreboot framework	Furquan Shaikh
	Add support for enabling different coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) to have arm64 architecture. Most of the files have been copied over from arm/ or arm64-generic work. Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/197397 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 033ba96516805502673ac7404bc97e6ce4e2a934) This patch is essentially a squash of aarch64 changes made by these patches: d955885 coreboot: Rename coreboot_ram stage to ramstage a492761 cbmem console: Locate the preram console with a symbol instead of a sect 96e7f0e aarch64: Enable early icache and migrate SCTLR from EL3 3f854dc aarch64: Pass coreboot table in jmp_to_elf_entry ab3ecaf aarch64/foundation-armv8: Set up RAM area and enter ramstage 25fd2e9 aarch64: Remove CAR definitions from early_variables.h 65bf77d aarch64/foundation-armv8: Enable DYNAMIC_CBMEM 9484873 aarch64: Change default exception level to EL2 7a152c3 aarch64: Fix formatting of exception registers dump 6946464 aarch64: Implement basic exception handling c732a9d aarch64/foundation-armv8: Basic bootblock implementation 3bc412c aarch64: Comment out some parts of code to allow build ab5be71 Add initial aarch64 support The ramstage support is the only portion that has been tested on actual hardware. Bootblock and romstage support may require modifications to run on hardware. Change-Id: Icd59bec55c963a471a50e30972a8092e4c9d2fb2 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6915 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>