| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Non-x86 boards currently need to hardcode the position of their CBFS
master header in a Kconfig. This is very brittle because it is usually
put in between the bootblock and the first CBFS entry, without any
checks to guarantee that it won't overlap either of those. It is not fun
to debug random failures that move and disappear with tiny alignment
changes because someone decided to write "ORBC1112" over some part of
your data section (in a way that is not visible in the symbolized .elf
binaries, only in the final image). This patch seeks to prevent those
issues and reduce the need for manual configuration by making the image
layout a completely automated part of cbfstool.
Since automated placement of the CBFS header means we can no longer
hardcode its position into coreboot, this patch takes the existing x86
solution of placing a pointer to the header at the very end of the
CBFS-managed section of the ROM and generalizes it to all architectures.
This is now even possible with the read-only/read-write split in
ChromeOS, since coreboot knows how large that section is from the
CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which is by default equal to ROM_SIZE, but can be
changed on systems that place other data next to coreboot/CBFS in ROM).
Also adds a feature to cbfstool that makes the -B (bootblock file name)
argument on image creation optional, since we have recently found valid
use cases for CBFS images that are not the first boot medium of the
device (instead opened by an earlier bootloader that can already
interpret CBFS) and therefore don't really need a bootblock.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky, Nyan_Blaze and Falco.
Change-Id: Ib715bb8db258e602991b34f994750a2d3e2d5adf
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: e9879c0fbd57f105254c54bacb3e592acdcad35c
Original-Change-Id: Ifcc755326832755cfbccd6f0a12104cba28a20af
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229975
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9620
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Some projects (like ChromeOS) put more content than described by CBFS
onto their image. For top-aligned images (read: x86), this has
traditionally been achieved with a CBFS_SIZE Kconfig (which denotes the
area actually managed by CBFS, as opposed to ROM_SIZE) that is used to
calculate the CBFS entry start offset. On bottom-aligned boards, many
define a fake (smaller) ROM_SIZE for only the CBFS part, which is not
consistently done and can be an issue because ROM_SIZE is expected to be
a power of two.
This patch changes all non-x86 boards to describe their actual
(physical) ROM size via one of the BOARD_ROMSIZE_KB_xxx options as a
mainboard Kconfig select (which is the correct place to declare
unchangeable physical properties of the board). It also changes the
cbfstool create invocation to use CBFS_SIZE as the -s parameter for
those architectures, which defaults to ROM_SIZE but gets overridden for
special use cases like ChromeOS. This has the advantage that cbfstool
has a consistent idea of where the area it is responsible for ends,
which offers better bounds-checking and is needed for a subsequent fix.
Also change the FMAP offset to default to right behind the (now
consistently known) CBFS region for non-x86 boards, which has emerged as
a de-facto standard on those architectures and allows us to reduce the
amount of custom configuration. In the future, the nightmare that is
ChromeOS's image build system could be redesigned to enforce this
automatically, and also confirm that it doesn't overwrite any space used
by CBFS (which is now consistently defined as the file size of
coreboot.rom on non-x86).
CQ-DEPEND=CL:231576,CL:231475
BRANCH=None
BUG=chromium:422501
TEST=Built and booted on Veyron_Pinky.
Change-Id: I89aa5b30e25679e074d4cb5eee4c08178892ada6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: e707c67c69599274b890d0686522880aa2e16d71
Original-Change-Id: I4fce5a56a8d72f4c4dd3a08c129025f1565351cc
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/229974
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9619
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
startup.c provides function to enable CPU in any stage to save register data
that can be used by secondary CPU (for normal boot) or any CPU (for resume
boot). stage_entry.S defines space for saving arm64_startup_data. This can be
filled by:
1) Primary CPU before bringing up secondary CPUs so that the secondary can use
register values to initialize MMU-related and other required registers to
appropriate values.
2) CPU suspend path to ensure that on resume the values which were saved are
restored appropriately.
stage_entry.S provides a common path for both normal and resume boot to
initialize saved registers. For resume path, it is important to set the
secondary entry point for startup since x26 needs to be 1 for enabling MMU and
cache.
This also ensures that we do not fall into false memory cache errors which
caused CPU to fail during normal / resume boot. Thus, we can get rid of the
stack cache invalidate for secondary CPUs.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:33962
BRANCH=None
TEST=Compiles and boots both CPU0 and CPU1 on ryu without mmu_enable and stack
cache invalidate for CPU1.
Change-Id: Ia4ca0e7d35c0738dbbaa926cce4268143c6f9de3
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 9f5e78469313ddd144ad7cf5abc3e07cb712183a
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Change-Id: I527a95779cf3fed37392b6605b096f54f8286d64
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/231561
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9540
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
In order to dynamically allocate structures based on
affinity levels add malloc() support.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:32136
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted to kernel.
Change-Id: I40cbd8497a1599db12b9e87eeb379f7dcd21c9b0
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 9cd2b23c2ea045b5832b3d838e29f4b6a1b6cdfb
Original-Change-Id: Ie1412a3a9eb07689059a2cd69bd111274bcb88fa
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/226482
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9389
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
BUG=chrome-os-partner:32973
BRANCH=None
TEST=Compiles successfully
Change-Id: Ia4715fd7a852b82c66d436eb12988f8e3290b9b0
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 0d88dd324a8ee0ace51e9ad2343d81cc828a4f34
Original-Change-Id: I662163848a772018f1e8eb003aa3d3bc06e80e98
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/223347
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9359
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
This stage is not tested on any hardware.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Compiles successfully for rush_ryu and veyron_pinky
Original-Change-Id: I6dd266471c815895bb3dd53d34aacc8fe825eeb6
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/221911
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 907ea2d1f8c9f01d815e8673695dd5271322c7a8)
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I617a742d4a387be947086dae33e9a913f742a8d1
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9255
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
This patch creates a new mechanism to define the static memory layout
(primarily in SRAM) for a given board, superseding the brittle mass of
Kconfigs that we were using before. The core part is a memlayout.ld file
in the mainboard directory (although boards are expected to just include
the SoC default in most cases), which is the primary linker script for
all stages (though not rmodules for now). It uses preprocessor macros
from <memlayout.h> to form a different valid linker script for all
stages while looking like a declarative, boilerplate-free map of memory
addresses to the programmer. Linker asserts will automatically guarantee
that the defined regions cannot overlap. Stages are defined with a
maximum size that will be enforced by the linker. The file serves to
both define and document the memory layout, so that the documentation
cannot go missing or out of date.
The mechanism is implemented for all boards in the ARM, ARM64 and MIPS
architectures, and should be extended onto all systems using SRAM in the
future. The CAR/XIP environment on x86 has very different requirements
and the layout is generally not as static, so it will stay like it is
and be unaffected by this patch (save for aligning some symbol names for
consistency and sharing the new common ramstage linker script include).
BUG=None
TEST=Booted normally and in recovery mode, checked suspend/resume and
the CBMEM console on Falco, Blaze (both normal and vboot2), Pinky and
Pit. Compiled Ryu, Storm and Urara, manually compared the disassemblies
with ToT and looked for red flags.
Change-Id: Ifd2276417f2036cbe9c056f17e42f051bcd20e81
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: f1e2028e7ebceeb2d71ff366150a37564595e614
Original-Change-Id: I005506add4e8fcdb74db6d5e6cb2d4cb1bd3cda5
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/213370
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9283
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@gmx.at>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
|
|
This allows combining and simplifying linker scripts.
This is inspired by the commit listed below, but rewritten to match
upstream, and split in smaller pieces to keep intent clear.
Change-Id: Ie5c11bd8495a399561cefde2f3e8dd300f4feb98
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Based-On-Change-Id: I50af7dacf616e0f8ff4c43f4acc679089ad7022b
Based-On-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Based-On-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/219170
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9303
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
The prog_run() function abstracts away what is required
for running a given program. Within it, there are 2
calls: 1. platform_prog_run() and 2. arch_prog_run().
The platform_prog_run() allows for a chipset to intercept
a program that will be run. This allows for CPU switching
as currently needed in t124 and t132.
Change-Id: I22a5dd5bfb1018e7e46475e47ac993a0941e2a8c
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8846
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
|
|
The cpu.c contains some helpful construts as well as ramstage
devicetree handling. Split the 2 pieces so that cpu.c can be
reused in secmon.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:30785
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted.
Change-Id: Iec0f8462411897a255f7aa289191ce6761e08bb0
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 4f30f1186950424b65df6858965a09ca51637e4f
Original-Change-Id: Ie87bd35bf1ccd777331250dcdaae07dab82d3d18
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/218842
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9089
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
There was a hacky and one-off spin table support in tegra132.
Make this support generic for all arm64 chips.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:32082
BRANCH=None
TEST=Ran with and without secure monitor booting smp into the kernel.
Change-Id: I3425ab0c30983d4c74d0aa465dda38bb2c91c83b
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 024dc3f3e5262433a56ed14934db837b5feb1748
Original-Change-Id: If12083a9afc3b2be663d36cfeed10f9b74bae3c8
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/218654
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9084
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Secure monitor runs at EL3 and is responsible for jumping to the payload at
specified EL and also to manage features like PSCI.
Adding basic implementation of secure monitor as a rmodule. Currently, it just
jumps to the the payload at current EL. Support for switching el and PSCI will
be added as separate patches.
CQ-DEPEND=CL:218300
BUG=chrome-os-partner:30785
BRANCH=None
TEST=Compiles succesfully and secure monitor loads and runs payload on ryu
Change-Id: If0f22299a9bad4e93311154e5546f5bae3f3395c
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 5e40a21115aeac1cc3c73922bdc3e42d4cdb7d34
Original-Change-Id: I86d5e93583afac141ff61475bd05c8c82d17d926
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/214371
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9080
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Transition library provides the following functionalities:
1) Setup the environment for switching to any particular EL and jump to the
loaded program at that EL. In short "Execute program X at exception level Y
using the state Z"
2) Provides routines for exception entry and exception exit that can be used by
any program to implement exception handling. The only routine required by the
program would be exc_dispatch which handles the exception in its own required
way and returns by making a call to exc_exit. On exc_exit, the transition
library unwinds the whole stack by popping out the saved state of xregs
BUG=chrome-os-partner:30785
BRANCH=None
TEST=Compiles successfully and exceptions are tested for ramstage on ryu
Change-Id: I8116556109665e61a53e4b3987d649e3cfed64a1
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 8ab888e8cae0c5f1e79b0e16ca292869f16f1cca
Original-Change-Id: I90f664ac657258724dc0c79bd9f6ceef70064f90
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/216375
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9070
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Currently, the rmodules inclusion for vboot is dependent on ramstage_arch.
This change adds dependency on romstage_arch, since vboot is associated with
romstage. Inclusion based on ramstage_arch is left as is in case someone needs
it in ramstage.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:30784
BRANCH=None
TEST=Compiles successfully for link, rush and nyan
Original-Change-Id: Ib62415671c26a4a18c7133d98e8c683414def32b
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/209568
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 00da67cc02c81d7a6160f7336b33bf53b00e1875)
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Change-Id: I9df02134af4e396c7257a2db2e2c371cfd1a02bc
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8673
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Provide functionality to create dynamic classes based on program name and the
architecture for which the program needs to be compiled/linked. define_class
takes program_name and arch as its arguments and adds the program_name to
classes-y to create dynamic class and compiler toolset is created for the
specified arch. All the files for this program can then be added to
program_name-y += .. Ensure that define_class is called before any files are
added to the class. Check subdirs-y for order of directory inclusion.
One such example of dynamic class is rmodules. Multiple rmodules can be used
which need to be compiled for different architectures. With dynamic classes,
this is possible.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:30784
BRANCH=None
TEST=Compiles successfully for nyan, rush and link.
Original-Change-Id: I3e3aadbe723d432b9b3500c44bcff578c98f5643
Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/209379
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 242bb90d7476c2ee47d60c50ee18785edeb1a295)
Some of this cherry-pick had already been committed here:
commit 133096b6dc31163f59f658e15f2eb342a0de2ac6
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Change-Id: I9f5868d704c4b3251ca6f54afa634588108a788c
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8672
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Some of the SoC's need an early hook to configure
certain registers. One example of this is on t132
where ramstage is the first thing being ran on the
arm64 core and it is the only entity that can configure
certain registers required for the rest of ramstage.
Therefore, provide the opportunity for the SoC to
implement such requirements.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:30572
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and ran through coreboot.
Original-Change-Id: Ib352f3788872f888581b398c9b394b7c4e54b02a
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/208061
Original-Reviewed-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2c50e2b39e75d1383e8e573c576630a5b7313349)
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Change-Id: I38df63e46c5c21b2d319fc9eb42053c3a0d61bc8
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8595
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Inconsistent progress was observed running ramstage.
It was determined that the hand-coded assembly functions
were causing issues. Some of the comments seems suspect about
the hardware taking care of alignment. The prudent thing to do
is to use the C ones. Optimization can come later after maturity.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:29923
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted to attempting to payload
Original-Change-Id: I4137adf9b36b638ed207e4efd57adaac64c6a6c1
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/207431
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2762e478c6b59dd30c59aa87a922d0f78c00c0c4)
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Change-Id: Id3196b0c2bf41a21db31f999ba437d118875a236
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8587
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Ramstage needs an assembly entry point for setting up
the initial state of the CPU. Therefore, a function is
provided, arm64_el3_startup(), that bootstraps the state
of the processor, initializes the stack pointer, and
branches to a defined entry symbol. To make this work
without adding too much preprocessor macro conditions
provide _stack and _estack for all the stages.
Currently the entry point after initialization is 'main',
however it can be changed/extended to do more work such
as seeding the stack contents with tombstones, etc.
It should be noted that romstage and bootblock weren't
tested. Only ramstage is known to work.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:29923
BRANCH=None
TEST=Brought up 64-bit ramstage on rush.
Original-Change-Id: I1f07d5b6656e13e6667b038cdc1f4be8843d1960
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/207262
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 7850ee3a7bf48c05f2e64147edb92161f8308f19)
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Change-Id: Ia87697f49638c8c249215d441d95f1ec621e0949
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8585
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
|
|
There were a number of issues with the ARM64 build files. This
patch ports the following changes from ARMV4/V7 to ARMV8:
- make armv8 Kconfig options consistent with armv4/v7
- fix build include issues in boot.c, tables.c,
and early_variables.h by matching armv4/v7.
Change-Id: I57359a96821d88c50f48dc0bb6ad226cacb0c2ec
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Change-Id: Iacd95d336559c45458784d1da67bde62a0956620
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8236
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
No need to pass calls through gcc in one case and
directly to binutils in another. Just always call
binutils.
Change-Id: Icf9660ce40d3c23f96dfab6a73c169ff07d3e42b
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Add support for enabling different coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and
ramstage) to have arm64 architecture. Most of the files have been copied over
from arm/ or arm64-generic work.
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/197397
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 033ba96516805502673ac7404bc97e6ce4e2a934)
This patch is essentially a squash of aarch64 changes made by
these patches:
d955885 coreboot: Rename coreboot_ram stage to ramstage
a492761 cbmem console: Locate the preram console with a symbol instead of a sect
96e7f0e aarch64: Enable early icache and migrate SCTLR from EL3
3f854dc aarch64: Pass coreboot table in jmp_to_elf_entry
ab3ecaf aarch64/foundation-armv8: Set up RAM area and enter ramstage
25fd2e9 aarch64: Remove CAR definitions from early_variables.h
65bf77d aarch64/foundation-armv8: Enable DYNAMIC_CBMEM
9484873 aarch64: Change default exception level to EL2
7a152c3 aarch64: Fix formatting of exception registers dump
6946464 aarch64: Implement basic exception handling
c732a9d aarch64/foundation-armv8: Basic bootblock implementation
3bc412c aarch64: Comment out some parts of code to allow build
ab5be71 Add initial aarch64 support
The ramstage support is the only portion that has been tested
on actual hardware. Bootblock and romstage support may require
modifications to run on hardware.
Change-Id: Icd59bec55c963a471a50e30972a8092e4c9d2fb2
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6915
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
