summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/arch/arm/boot.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2015-05-21Remove address from GPLv2 headersPatrick Georgi
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons but because there are tools that look for them, and giving them a standard pattern simplifies things. However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a new lease, but can drop the address instead. util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that we may want to synchronize every now and then. $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -a \! -name \*.patch \ -a \! -name \*_shipped \ -a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \ -a \! -name LGPL.txt \ -a \! -name COPYING \ -a \! -name DISCLAIMER \ -exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
2015-04-03program loading: unify on struct progAaron Durbin
Instead of having different structures for loading ramstage and payload align to using struct prog. This also removes arch_payload_run() in favor of the prog_run() interface. Change-Id: I31483096094eacc713a7433811cd69cc5621c43e Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8849 Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
2015-04-03program loading: add prog_run() functionAaron Durbin
The prog_run() function abstracts away what is required for running a given program. Within it, there are 2 calls: 1. platform_prog_run() and 2. arch_prog_run(). The platform_prog_run() allows for a chipset to intercept a program that will be run. This allows for CPU switching as currently needed in t124 and t132. Change-Id: I22a5dd5bfb1018e7e46475e47ac993a0941e2a8c Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8846 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
2015-04-03program loading: introduce struct progAaron Durbin
The struct prog serves as way to consolidate program loading. This abstraction can be used to perform more complicated execution paths such as running a program on a separate CPU after it has been loaded. Currently t124 and t132 need to do that in the boot path. Follow on patches will allow the platform to decide how to execute a particular program. Note: the vboot path is largely untouched because it's already broken in the coreboot.org tree. After getting all the necessary patches pushed then vboot will be fixed. Change-Id: Ic6e6fe28c5660fb41edee5fd8661eaf58222f883 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8839 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
2015-03-20loaders: add program_loading.h header fileAaron Durbin
Instead of two headers for payload and ramstage loading combine the 2 files into one. This also allows for easier refactoring by keeping header files consistent. Change-Id: I4a6dffb78ad84c78e6e96c886d361413f9b4a17d Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8708 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-12-09libpayload: arm: Pass the coreboot table location to the payload.Gabe Black
To find the coreboot tables, the payload has historically searched for their signature in a predefined region of memory. This is a little clumsy on x86, but it works because you can assume certain regions are RAM. Also, there are areas which are set aside for the firmware by convention. On x86 there's a forwarding entry which goes in one of those fairly small conventional areas and which points to the CBMEM area at the end of memory. On ARM there aren't areas like that, so we've left out the forwarding entry and gone directly to CBMEM. RAM may not start at the beginning of the address space or go to its end, and that means there isn't really anywhere fixed you can put the coreboot tables. That's meant that libpayload has to be configured on a per board basis to know where to look for CBMEM. Now that we have boards that don't have fixed amounts of memory, the location of the end of RAM isn't fixed even on a per board level which means even that workaround will no longer cut it. This change makes coreboot pass the location of the coreboot tables to libpayload using r0, the first argument register. That means we'll be able to find them no matter where CBMEM is, and we can get rid of the per board search ranges. We can extend this mechanism to x86 as well, but there may be more complications and it's less necessary there. It would be a good thing to do eventually though. BUG=None TEST=Built and booted on nyan. Changed the size of memory and saw that the payload could still find the coreboot tables where before it couldn't. Built for pit, snow, and big. BRANCH=None Original-Change-Id: I7218afd999da1662b0db8172fd8125670ceac471 Original-Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/185572 Original-Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Original-Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit ca88f39c21158b59abe3001f986207a292359cf5) Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: Iab14e9502b6ce7a55f0a72e190fa582f89f11a1e Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7655 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2014-09-08ARM: Generalize armv7 as arm.Gabe Black
There are ARM systems which are essentially heterogeneous multicores where some cores implement a different ARM architecture version than other cores. A specific example is the tegra124 which boots on an ARMv4 coprocessor while most code, including most of the firmware, runs on the main ARMv7 core. To support SOCs like this, the plan is to generalize the ARM architecture so that all versions are available, and an SOC/CPU can then select what architecture variant should be used for each component of the firmware; bootblock, romstage, and ramstage. Old-Change-Id: I22e048c3bc72bd56371e14200942e436c1e312c2 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171338 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 8423a41529da0ff67fb9873be1e2beb30b09ae2d) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> ARM: Split out ARMv7 code and make it possible to have other arch versions. We don't always want to use ARMv7 code when building for ARM, so we should separate out the ARMv7 code so it can be excluded, and also make it possible to include code for some other version of the architecture instead, all per build component for cases where we need more than one architecture version at a time. The tegra124 bootblock will ultimately need to be ARMv4, but until we have some ARMv4 code to switch over to we can leave it set to ARMv7. Old-Change-Id: Ia982c91057fac9c252397b7c866224f103761cc7 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171400 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 799514e6060aa97acdcf081b5c48f965be134483) Squashed two related patches for splitting ARM support into general ARM support and ARMv7 specific pieces. Change-Id: Ic6511507953a2223c87c55f90252c4a4e1dd6010 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6782 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)