summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/payloads/libpayload/include/x86/arch
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-11-10arm: Redesign, clarify and clean up cache related codeJulius Werner
This patch changes several cache-related pieces to be cleaner, faster or more correct. The largest point is removing the old arm_invalidate_caches() function and surrounding bootblock code to initialize SCTLR and replace it with an all-assembly function that takes care of cache and SCTLR initialization to bring the system to a known state. It runs without stack and before coreboot makes any write accesses to be as compatible as possible with whatever state the system was left in by preceeding code. This also finally fixes the dreaded icache bug that wasted hundreds of milliseconds during boot. Old-Change-Id: I7bb4995af8184f6383f8e3b1b870b0662bde8bd4 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/183890 (cherry picked from commit 07a35925dc957919bf88dfc90515971a36e81b97) nyan_big: apply cache-related changes from nyan This applies the same changes from 07a3592 that were applied to nyan. Old-Change-Id: Idcbe85436d7a2f65fcd751954012eb5f4bec0b6c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/184551 Commit-Queue: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 4af27f02614da41c611aee2c6d175b1b948428ea) Squashed the followup patch for nyan_big into the original patch. Change-Id: Id14aef7846355ea2da496e55da227b635aca409e Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> (cherry picked from commit 4cbf25f8eca3a12bbfec5b015953c0fc2b69c877) Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6993 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-09-25libpayload: Add missing cache API stub to x86Julius Werner
This patch adds another cache invalidation stub to the x86 arch to make it usable in common code. This whole stuff should probably be redesigned anyway but I just want to get it working and unblock my CL for now... more cleanups coming later. Change-Id: I2e8bdd8aa0e6723209384c24042f053f2e993fe6 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/182534 Reviewed-by: Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit cafce5182a7a2a9ce17ad40d9d893a40ebd5aafd) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6919 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2014-08-14libpayload: Make EHCI driver cache-awareJulius Werner
This patch makes the EHCI driver work on ARM platforms which usually do not support automatic cache snooping. It uses the new DMA memory mechanism (which needs to be correctly set up in the Coreboot mainboard code) to allocate all EHCI-internal communication structures in cache-coherent memory, and cleans/invalidates the externally supplied transfer buffers in Bulk and Control functions with explicit calls as necessary. Old-Change-Id: Ie8a62545d905b7a4fdd2a56b9405774be69779e5 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/167339 (cherry picked from commit 322338934add36a5372ffe7d2a45e61a4fdd4a54) libpayload: ehci: Cache management is hard, let's go copying... It turns out that my previous commit to make the EHCI stack cache aware on ARM devices wasn't quite correct, and the problem is actually much trickier than I thought. After having some fun with more weird transfer problems that appear/disappear based on stack alignment, this is my current worst-case threat model that any cache managing implementation would need to handle correctly: Some upper layer calls ehci_bulk() with a transfer buffer on its stack. Due to stack alignment, it happens to start just at the top of a cache line, so up to 64 - 4 bytes of ehci_bulk's stack will share that line. ehci_bulk() calls dcache_clean() and initializes the USB transfer. Between that point and the call to dcache_invalidate() at the end of ehci_bulk(), any access to the stack variables in that cache line (even a speculative prefetch) will refetch the line into the cache. Afterwards any other access to a random memory location that just happens to get aliased to the same cache line may evict it again, causing the processor to write out stale data to the transfer buffer and possibly overwrite data that has already been received over USB. In short, any dcache_clean/dcache_invalidate-based implementation that preserves correctness while allowing any arbitrary (non cache-aligned) memory location as a transfer buffer is presumed to be impossible. Instead, this patch causes all transfer data to be copied to/from a cache-coherent bounce buffer. It will still transfer directly if the supplied buffer is already cache-coherent, which can be used by callers to optimize their transfers (and is true by default on x86). Old-Change-Id: I112908410bdbc8ca028d44f2f5d388c529f8057f Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/169231 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 702dc50f1d56fe206442079fa443437f4336daed) Squashed the initial commit and a follow up fix. Change-Id: Idf7e5aa855b4f0221f82fa380a76049f273e4c88 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6633 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-12-05libpayload: Have similar cache api on ARM and x86Stefan Reinauer
So far this is used by the USB driver, and instead of having ifdefs all throughout that code, implement the same API on x86 and ARM. Change-Id: I8093ad818ad2e38a0901787aa8674faf591d580c Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/56105 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org> Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4320 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-11-10libpayload: add memory clobber to ins{b,w,l}Gerd Hoffmann
Change-Id: I3c4b8a9eeb6c4b2bcc58ccff091b4c997b2da923 Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4034 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2013-04-18libpayload: Don't sneak in compiler includesStefan Reinauer
The way we got to include the compiler includes was kind of whacky. Instead of mixing in potentially problematic headers, make libpayload self-contained by adding some missing header files. Also clean up conflicting definitions of size_t throughout the tree. Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Change-Id: I0ad1194de1a00b7133c5477c00eb167d63a2ee85 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/47608 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3058 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-03-26libpayload: Fix type issuesStefan Reinauer
There were a number of type issues in libpayload that sneaked in with 903f8e0. - size_t and ssize_t were conflicting with gcc builtins - some stdint types were used in libpayload but not defined in our stdint.h With this patch it's possible to compile libpayload with the reference toolchain again. Change-Id: Idd5ccfdd9f3536b36bceca2d101e7405883b10bc Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2903 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-03-13libpayload: Add size_t and ssize_t types for ARM and x86Gabe Black
Some new TPM drivers in depthcharge require that type. I added it to arch/types.h which seemed appropriate, but I'm not sure that's exactly the right header to use, or in other words if you'd get that type from libpayload the same way you'd get it if you were building a standard Linux program. Also, I attempted to determine what underlying types gcc would use, and while I think I picked the right ones I'm not 100% certain of that either. Change-Id: Ic5c0b4173c8565ede3bfce8870976d596d69e51d Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2669 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-14libpayload: rename i386 to x86Stefan Reinauer
Change-Id: Ia9170bd3d04e76dbf9321ca7ea4be23b5e468d21 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2033 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>