summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/payloads/libpayload/include/compiler.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-04-04Make common macros double-evaluation safeJulius Werner
I just got hit by a double-evaluation bug again, it's time to attempt to fix this once more. Unfortunately there are several issues that don't make this easy: - bitfield variables don't support typeof() - local macro variables that shadow others trigger -Werror=shadow - sign warnings with integer literal and unsigned var in typeof-MIN() - ({ statement expressions }) can not be used outside functions - romcc doesn't support any of the fancy GCC/clang extensions This patch tries to address all of them as far as possible with macro magic. We don't have the technology to solve the bitfield and non-function context issues yet (__builtin_choose_expr() still throws a "no statement expression outside a function" error if it's only in the branch that's not chosen, unfortunately), so we'll have to provide alternative macros for use in those cases (and we'll avoid making __ALIGN_MASK() double-evaluation safe for now, since it would be annoying to do that there and having an alignment mask with side effects seems very unlikely). romcc can continue using unsafe versions since we're hopefully not writing a lot of new code for it. Sign warnings can be avoided in literal/variable comparisons by always using the type of the variable there. Shadowing is avoided by picking very explicit local variable names and using a special __COUNTER__ solution for MIN() and MAX() (the only ones of these you're likely to nest). Also add DIV_ROUND_UP() to libpayload since it's a generally quite useful thing to have. Change-Id: Iea35156c9aa9f6f2c7b8f00991418b746f44315d Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32027 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2017-08-08add __must_check to */compiler.hCaveh Jalali
the __must_check function attribute is pretty much straight from the linux kernel - used to encourage callers to consume function return values. Change-Id: I1812d957b745d6bebe2a8d34a9c4862316aa8530 Signed-off-by: Caveh Jalali <caveh@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20881 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2017-07-13Rename __attribute__((packed)) --> __packedStefan Reinauer
Also unify __attribute__ ((..)) to __attribute__((..)) and handle ((__packed__)) like ((packed)) Change-Id: Ie60a51c3fa92b5009724a5b7c2932e361bf3490c Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15921 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>