| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
A couple people discussed recently how it's a shame that on some
architectures we can bring up a device but then have nothing to do with
it afterwards. Having payloads to choose from would help a lot there.
Change-Id: Ia66f22947d09afe3076cc2ee12f5b652fe80fc3a
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31415
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Adding the Kernel Address Sanitizer feature to coreboot would help to
find bugs.
Change-Id: If00010e81147ec50e037678230df17c6888e40a2
Signed-off-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31414
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
We already had such a page on the wiki, but it's outdated and the wiki
is supposed to go the way of the dodo anyway.
This is a fresh start to make sure that all ideas we're coming up with
are still current and that there are mentors willing to support them.
Change-Id: Idd68f845930bd37a2293969b9a153cf584d6d15f
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30972
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
