| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This should not have any impact on produced binaries.
Due to the simplicity, the patch has not been tested.
Change-Id: Ic52f2be6a91aa3534d222f08733d1ba8bc1265a9
Signed-off-by: Tillmann Severin <tillmann.severin@mailbox.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80140
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The rule being added to the refactoring section is already present
in the "coding style" section of the guide, but is currently easy
to miss. Adding it to its own section makes it a little more plain
and makes it more strongly worded.
Update a couple of other areas:
- Make kernel specific phrasing better aligned with coreboot.
- Remove duplicate "try to match" phrase in coding style section.
- Remove section on Data structures - it doesn't apply to coreboot.
- Update text to make it clearer and more coreboot-centric.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ic3508529f639ea0609d2ea2032cc52407e9543e5
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71067
Reviewed-by: Varshit Pandya <pandyavarshit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Lai <eric_lai@quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
|
|
This patch adds a new section to the coding style which codifies
existing practices about how to handle errors and how to use the die()
and assert() macros. Also clean up some references to Linux-specific
facilities that do not exist in coreboot in the adjacent function return
type guidelines, and add a small blurb of documentation to the
definition of the assert() macro itself.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ice37ed9f995a56d69476e95a352209041b337284
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/70775
Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
|
|
While the fall through comment is sufficient for gcc to notice that the
fall-through is intentional, clang requires a special attribute which
also works for gcc. Update the documentation to use this attribute
instead of the comment.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I08dbac8ff1f9e04770a03fb74fabf0d397b50989
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71102
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Lai <eric_lai@quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Change-Id: I2f2cd20139f4cdb7ba665e9e49a03faea1ac085b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/67658
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
|
|
Link to Linux kernel coding style changed, fix it.
Change-Id: I9792d360d301b93c255306488c90375c6cc882c4
Signed-off-by: Lance Zhao <lance.zhao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65959
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: John Zhao <john.zhao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bora Guvendik <bora.guvendik@intel.com>
|
|
This patch adds a section to the coding style that explicitly clarifies
the use of GCC extensions in coreboot (which has been long-standing
practice anyway), and expressly allows their use.
See the mailing list discussion for more details:
https://mail.coreboot.org/hyperkitty/list/coreboot@coreboot.org/thread/3C2QWAZ5RJ6ME5KXMEOGB5GW62UTXCLS/
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I0d0eb90d6729fefeb131cdd573ad51f1884afe11
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/63660
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Krystian Hebel <krystian.hebel@3mdeb.com>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
This change mostly changes links that were identified as broken by
the 'website_scans' jenkins job.
There were some links that seem to be up at times, but that are
identified by link-checker as broken because of SSL issues.
At least one other link was changed to point to archive.org so
that it doesn't break at some point in the future. We should
probably try to make sure that everything is archived there and
point to those versions when possible.
There are still lots more links to do.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: I36868ddf6113e18fa6841427dd635c75445b7bef
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/62672
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
|
|
The coding style doc isn't short, so scrap that, and it's specific to
the C parts of our tree, so add that.
Change-Id: Ib1ef7c1a96ff40f0cfbae7d22a47a95128981eb8
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58381
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
These issues were found and fixed by codespell, a useful tool for
finding spelling errors.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: If2a8e97911420c19e9365d5c28810b998f2c2ac8
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58078
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch adds a bit of a "preamble" to the coding style to provide
guideance on how it should be applied and how style questions that
aren't mentioned should be handled.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I88efd5f1006bd1fd82cea14ea65422d9958dc197
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50966
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
This patch is trying to address some of the concerns raised in CB:50247
after the patch had landed. The preference for alphabetized headers was
just supposed to discourage leaving headers completely unordered, and
wasn't intended to disallow other intentional include orderings such as
grouping local includes after system ones or specific ordering
constraints that exist for technical reasons. This patch adds a few more
sentences to try to clarify that.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I6825f4a57613fabb88a00ae46679b4774ef7110b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51553
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
Keep less files in the root directory.
Change-Id: I9eebd0b0826181340ead41af5284362d1cca09d7
Signed-off-by: Alexey Vazhnov <vazhnov@boot-keys.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50852
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
