| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Commit 35599f9a6671 (Docs: Replace Recommonmark with MyST Parser)
converted recommonmark style toctrees in bulk using a script. This was
done by searching for lists of references, which is how recommonmark
denoted toctree entries. However, this also converted lists of external
URLs, which would not normally be included in the toctree. Revert these
cases back to lists of URLs as they were before the migration.
Change-Id: Ie4da3d908d4b84c2c7e3572fb4baaeed1f8edb45
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/84244
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
|
|
Recommonmark has been deprecated since 2021 [1] and the last release was
over 3 years ago [2]. As per their announcement, Markedly Structured
Text (MyST) Parser [3] is the recommended replacement.
For the most part, the existing documentation is compatible with MyST,
as both parsers are built around the CommonMark flavor of Markdown. The
main difference that affects coreboot is how the Sphinx toctree is
generated. Recommonmark has a feature called auto_toc_tree, which
converts single level lists of references into a toctree:
* [Part 1: Starting from scratch](part1.md)
* [Part 2: Submitting a patch to coreboot.org](part2.md)
* [Part 3: Writing unit tests](part3.md)
* [Managing local additions](managing_local_additions.md)
* [Flashing firmware](flashing_firmware/index.md)
MyST Parser does not provide a replacement for this feature, meaning the
toctree must be defined manually. This is done using MyST's syntax for
Sphinx directives:
```{toctree}
:maxdepth: 1
Part 1: Starting from scratch <part1.md>
Part 2: Submitting a patch to coreboot.org <part2.md>
Part 3: Writing unit tests <part3.md>
Managing local additions <managing_local_additions.md>
Flashing firmware <flashing_firmware/index.md>
```
Internally, auto_toc_tree essentially converts lists of references into
the Sphinx toctree structure that the MyST syntax above more directly
represents.
The toctrees were converted to the MyST syntax using the following
command and Python script:
`find ./ -iname "*.md" | xargs -n 1 python conv_toctree.py`
```
import re
import sys
in_list = False
f = open(sys.argv[1])
lines = f.readlines()
f.close()
with open(sys.argv[1], "w") as f:
for line in lines:
match = re.match(r"^[-*+] \[(.*)\]\((.*)\)$", line)
if match is not None:
if not in_list:
in_list = True
f.write("```{toctree}\n")
f.write(":maxdepth: 1\n\n")
f.write(match.group(1) + " <" + match.group(2) + ">\n")
else:
if in_list:
f.write("```\n")
f.write(line)
in_list = False
if in_list:
f.write("```\n")
```
While this does add a little more work for creating the toctree, this
does give more control over exactly what goes into the toctree. For
instance, lists of links to external resources currently end up in the
toctree, but we may want to limit it to pages within coreboot.
This change does break rendering and navigation of the documentation in
applications that can render Markdown, such as Okular, Gitiles, or the
GitHub mirror. Assuming the docs are mainly intended to be viewed after
being rendered to doc.coreboot.org, this is probably not an issue in
practice.
Another difference is that MyST natively supports Markdown tables,
whereas with Recommonmark, tables had to be written in embedded rST [4].
However, MyST also supports embedded rST, so the existing tables can be
easily converted as the syntax is nearly identical.
These were converted using
`find ./ -iname "*.md" | xargs -n 1 sed -i "s/eval_rst/{eval-rst}/"`
Makefile.sphinx and conf.py were regenerated from scratch by running
`sphinx-quickstart` using the updated version of Sphinx, which removes a
lot of old commented out boilerplate. Any relevant changes coreboot had
made on top of the previous autogenerated versions of these files were
ported over to the newly generated file.
From some initial testing the generated webpages appear and function
identically to the existing documentation built with Recommonmark.
TEST: `make -C util/docker docker-build-docs` builds the documentation
successfully and the generated output renders properly when viewed in
a web browser.
[1] https://github.com/readthedocs/recommonmark/issues/221
[2] https://pypi.org/project/recommonmark/
[3] https://myst-parser.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
[4] https://doc.coreboot.org/getting_started/writing_documentation.html
Change-Id: I0837c1722fa56d25c9441ea218e943d8f3d9b804
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/73158
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
- Change all links to wikipedia to https.
- Update some links to wikipedia that were incomplete.
- Update a few links that are now broken.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: If780e15997c499d1df975b436fd9af530f324eba
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/77488
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I19a69ffdf2c248223569153c00fbc76d5ceb7921
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/77382
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
|
|
- VBT information: The link from 01.org is dead, but appears to have
been identical to the i915 page in the Linux kernel docs based on
snapshots on archive.org.
- Cgit: coreboot no longer has cgit running for the repos it hosts,
and these links redirect to the Gitiles list of repos hosted on
review.coreboot.org. Based on snapshots on archive.org, these used
to link to the individual repo or tree. Replace these with an
equivalent Gitiles link.
Change-Id: Id0bfee7b806c851fbe1dcf357e14d9b593e8569a
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/74188
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@coreboot.org>
|
|
This change adds some new acronyms to the list, clarifies a couple of
points, and fixes a couple formatting issues.
I was planning on leaving this open for a bit and continuing to add
to the patch. If anyone else wants to help, please feel free to update
this patch as you see fit.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I07212849640e8ef14e3c4a41ade29498a4578bc6
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/72923
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
|
|
Change-Id: I3d925516e48231b15d9aa78c5ef05b6de1ef42ca
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Brune <maximilian.brune@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71665
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I417bb151afcb3e996d9a12b2274ef02f2126bc7d
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/67330
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Lai <eric_lai@quanta.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
|
|
coreboot uses TianoCore interchangeably with EDK II, and whilst the
meaning is generally clear, it's not the payload it uses. EDK II is
commonly written as edk2.
coreboot builds edk2 directly from the edk2 repository. Whilst it
can build some components from edk2-platforms, the target is still
edk2.
[1] tianocore.org - "Welcome to TianoCore, the community supporting"
[2] tianocore.org - "EDK II is a modern, feature-rich, cross-platform
firmware development environment for the UEFI and UEFI Platform
Initialization (PI) specifications."
Signed-off-by: Sean Rhodes <sean@starlabs.systems>
Change-Id: I4de125d92ae38ff8dfd0c4c06806c2d2921945ab
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65820
Reviewed-by: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Branding changes to unify and update Chrome OS to ChromeOS (removing the
space).
This CL also includes changing Chromium OS to ChromiumOS as well.
BUG=None
TEST=N/A
Change-Id: I39af9f1069b62747dbfeebdd62d85fabfa655dcd
Signed-off-by: Jon Murphy <jpmurphy@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65479
Reviewed-by: Jack Rosenthal <jrosenth@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
|
|
A few of the brackets and bold text asterisks in the markdown links were
missing their corresponding closing symbol.
Change-Id: I9bfab1d2c83bdc12586bd31b1939bd241df2e932
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65371
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@tutanota.com>
|
|
We have too many acronyms to keep track of. At one point, AMD and
Intel used to use the same terms for things, but no longer. When I
look at Intel patches now, I have no idea what they mean anymore.
When I started trying to do the release notes, I kept having to
look up the acronyms, so I figured I'd make a list.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I4571bf468bbfc6a1a6f33399ba61032a18fe41ec
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/64805
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
|
