summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/toolchain.inc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJulius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>2014-12-19 16:11:14 -0800
committerPatrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>2015-07-29 20:25:59 +0200
commit8d8799a33aac86c2acdf94e0f0af3ef291748536 (patch)
treeb0d8db5b4c54b4d3a3a94925d42b915efbfda633 /toolchain.inc
parentb759ede57940aef94f648def5ada163ec6fa166d (diff)
arm, arm64, mips: Add rough static stack size checks with -Wstack-usage
We've seen an increasing need to reduce stack sizes more and more for space reasons, and it's always guesswork because no one has a good idea how little is too litte. We now have boards with 3K and 2K stacks, and old pieces of common code often allocate large temporary buffers that would lead to very dangerous and hard to detect bugs when someone eventually tries to use them on one of those. This patch tries improve this situation at least a bit by declaring 2K as the minimum stack size all of coreboot code should work with. It checks all function frames with -Wstack-usage=1536 to make sure we don't allocate more than 1.5K in a single buffer. This is of course not a perfect test, but it should catch the most common situation of declaring a single, large buffer in some close-to-leaf function (with the assumption that 0.5K is hopefully enough for all the "normal" functions above that). Change one example where we were a bit overzealous and put a 1K buffer into BSS back to stack allocation, since it actually conforms to this new assumption and frees up another kilobyte of that highly sought-after verstage space. Not touching x86 with any of this since it's lack of __PRE_RAM__ BSS often requires it to allocate way more on the stack than would usually be considered sane. BRANCH=veyron BUG=None TEST=Compiled Cosmos, Daisy, Falco, Blaze, Pit, Storm, Urara and Pinky, made sure they still build as well as before and don't show any stack usage warnings. Change-Id: Idc53d33bd8487bbef49d3ecd751914b0308006ec Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 8e5931066575e256dfc2295c3dab7f0e1b65417f Original-Change-Id: I30bd9c2c77e0e0623df89b9e5bb43ed29506be98 Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/236978 Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9729 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'toolchain.inc')
-rw-r--r--toolchain.inc18
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/toolchain.inc b/toolchain.inc
index 89bc55c6bb..eea0560328 100644
--- a/toolchain.inc
+++ b/toolchain.inc
@@ -74,6 +74,24 @@ CFLAGS_riscv += -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
CFLAGS_x86_64 += -mcmodel=large -mno-red-zone
+# Some boards only provide 2K stacks, so storing lots of data there leads to
+# problems. Since C rules don't allow us to statically determine the maximum
+# stack use, we use 1.5K as heuristic, assuming that we typically have lots
+# of tiny stack frames and the odd large one.
+#
+# Store larger buffers in BSS, use MAYBE_STATIC to share code with __PRE_RAM__
+# on x86.
+# Since GCCs detection of dynamic array bounds unfortunately seems to be
+# very basic, you'll sometimes have to use a static upper bound for the
+# size and an assert() to make sure it's honored (see gpio_base3_value()
+# for an example).
+# (If you absolutely need a larger stack frame and are 100% sure it cannot
+# cause problems, you can whitelist it with #pragma diagnostic.)
+CFLAGS_arm += -Wstack-usage=1536
+CFLAGS_arm64 += -Wstack-usage=1536
+CFLAGS_mips += -Wstack-usage=1536
+CFLAGS_riscv += -Wstack-usage=1536
+
toolchain_to_dir = \
$(foreach arch,$(ARCH_SUPPORTED),\
$(eval CPPFLAGS_$(arch) += \