interesting behavior, i thought svn could do moves.

the result should be ok though..

the purpose is dropping the old i82801er southbridge code
and using the ich5r code instead because its the same chip
but the code looks more solid and is used by many more systems.

Some of the old i82801er features have been ported (like hpet enable)



git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@2241 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1

1 files changed, 48 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/southbridge/intel/i82801er/i82801er.c b/src/southbridge/intel/i82801er/i82801er.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..5e38ac3acb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/southbridge/intel/i82801er/i82801er.c
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+#include <console/console.h>
+#include <device/device.h>
+#include <device/pci.h>
+#include <device/pci_ids.h>
+#include "i82801er.h"
+
+void i82801er_enable(device_t dev)
+{
+	device_t lpc_dev;
+	unsigned index = 0;
+	uint16_t reg_old, reg;
+
+	/* See if we are behind the i82801er pci bridge */
+	lpc_dev = dev_find_slot(dev->bus->secondary, PCI_DEVFN(0x1f, 0));
+	if((dev->path.u.pci.devfn &0xf8)== 0xf8) {
+		index = dev->path.u.pci.devfn & 7;
+	}
+	else if((dev->path.u.pci.devfn &0xf8)== 0xe8) {
+		index = (dev->path.u.pci.devfn & 7) +8;
+	}
+	if ((!lpc_dev) || (index >= 16) || ((1<<index)&0x3091)) {
+		return;
+	}
+	if ((lpc_dev->vendor != PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL) ||
+		(lpc_dev->device != PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801ER_ISA)) {
+		uint32_t id;
+		id = pci_read_config32(lpc_dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID);
+		if (id != (PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL | 
+				(PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_82801ER_ISA << 16))) {
+			return;
+		}
+	}
+
+	reg = reg_old = pci_read_config16(lpc_dev, 0xf2);
+	reg &= ~(1 << index);
+	if (!dev->enabled) {
+		reg |= (1 << index);
+	}
+	if (reg != reg_old) {
+		pci_write_config16(lpc_dev, 0xf2, reg);
+	}
+	
+}
+
+struct chip_operations southbridge_intel_i82801er_ops = {
+	CHIP_NAME("Intel 82801ER Southbridge")
+	.enable_dev = i82801er_enable,
+};