soc/intel/tigerlake: Do initial SoC commit till ramstage

Clone entirely from Icelake

List of changes on top off initial icelake clone
1. Replace "Icelake" with "Tigerlake"
2. Replace "icl" with "tgl"
3. Replace "icp" with "tgp"
4. Rename structure based on Icelake with Tigerlake
5. Remove and clean below files
   5.a Clean up upd override in fsp_params.c,
	will be added once FSP available.
   5.b Remove __weak functions from fsp_params.c
   5.c Remove dGPU over PCIE enable Kconfig option
6. Add CPU/PCH/SA EDS document number and chapter number
7. Remove unnecessary headers from .c files based on review

Tiger Lake specific changes will follow in subsequent patches.
1. Include GPIO controller delta over ICL
2. FSP-S related UPD overrides as applicable

Change-Id: Id95e2fa9b7a7c6b3b9233d2c438b25a6c4904bbb
Signed-off-by: Ravi Sarawadi <ravishankar.sarawadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36087
Reviewed-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronak Kanabar <ronak.kanabar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>

1 files changed, 273 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/soc/intel/tigerlake/smmrelocate.c b/src/soc/intel/tigerlake/smmrelocate.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b3f98362e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/soc/intel/tigerlake/smmrelocate.c
@@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
+/*
+ * This file is part of the coreboot project.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 Intel Corp.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ */
+
+#include <types.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <device/device.h>
+#include <device/pci.h>
+#include <device/pci_ops.h>
+#include <cpu/x86/cache.h>
+#include <cpu/x86/lapic.h>
+#include <cpu/x86/mp.h>
+#include <cpu/x86/msr.h>
+#include <cpu/x86/mtrr.h>
+#include <cpu/x86/smm.h>
+#include <cpu/intel/em64t101_save_state.h>
+#include <cpu/intel/smm_reloc.h>
+#include <console/console.h>
+#include <soc/cpu.h>
+#include <soc/msr.h>
+#include <soc/pci_devs.h>
+#include <soc/smm.h>
+#include <soc/soc_chip.h>
+#include <soc/systemagent.h>
+
+/* This gets filled in and used during relocation. */
+static struct smm_relocation_params smm_reloc_params;
+
+static inline void write_smrr(struct smm_relocation_params *relo_params)
+{
+	printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "Writing SMRR. base = 0x%08x, mask=0x%08x\n",
+	       relo_params->smrr_base.lo, relo_params->smrr_mask.lo);
+	wrmsr(IA32_SMRR_PHYS_BASE, relo_params->smrr_base);
+	wrmsr(IA32_SMRR_PHYS_MASK, relo_params->smrr_mask);
+}
+
+static void update_save_state(int cpu, uintptr_t curr_smbase,
+				uintptr_t staggered_smbase,
+				struct smm_relocation_params *relo_params)
+{
+	u32 smbase;
+	u32 iedbase;
+
+	/*
+	 * The relocated handler runs with all CPUs concurrently. Therefore
+	 * stagger the entry points adjusting SMBASE downwards by save state
+	 * size * CPU num.
+	 */
+	smbase = staggered_smbase;
+	iedbase = relo_params->ied_base;
+
+	printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "New SMBASE=0x%08x IEDBASE=0x%08x\n",
+	       smbase, iedbase);
+
+	/*
+	 * All threads need to set IEDBASE and SMBASE to the relocated
+	 * handler region. However, the save state location depends on the
+	 * smm_save_state_in_msrs field in the relocation parameters. If
+	 * smm_save_state_in_msrs is non-zero then the CPUs are relocating
+	 * the SMM handler in parallel, and each CPUs save state area is
+	 * located in their respective MSR space. If smm_save_state_in_msrs
+	 * is zero then the SMM relocation is happening serially so the
+	 * save state is at the same default location for all CPUs.
+	 */
+	if (relo_params->smm_save_state_in_msrs) {
+		msr_t smbase_msr;
+		msr_t iedbase_msr;
+
+		smbase_msr.lo = smbase;
+		smbase_msr.hi = 0;
+
+		/*
+		 * According the BWG the IEDBASE MSR is in bits 63:32. It's
+		 * not clear why it differs from the SMBASE MSR.
+		 */
+		iedbase_msr.lo = 0;
+		iedbase_msr.hi = iedbase;
+
+		wrmsr(SMBASE_MSR, smbase_msr);
+		wrmsr(IEDBASE_MSR, iedbase_msr);
+	} else {
+		em64t101_smm_state_save_area_t *save_state;
+
+		save_state = (void *)(curr_smbase + SMM_DEFAULT_SIZE -
+				      sizeof(*save_state));
+
+		save_state->smbase = smbase;
+		save_state->iedbase = iedbase;
+	}
+}
+
+/* Returns 1 if SMM MSR save state was set. */
+static int bsp_setup_msr_save_state(struct smm_relocation_params *relo_params)
+{
+	msr_t smm_mca_cap;
+
+	smm_mca_cap = rdmsr(SMM_MCA_CAP_MSR);
+	if (smm_mca_cap.hi & SMM_CPU_SVRSTR_MASK) {
+		msr_t smm_feature_control;
+
+		smm_feature_control = rdmsr(SMM_FEATURE_CONTROL_MSR);
+		smm_feature_control.hi = 0;
+		smm_feature_control.lo |= SMM_CPU_SAVE_EN;
+		wrmsr(SMM_FEATURE_CONTROL_MSR, smm_feature_control);
+		relo_params->smm_save_state_in_msrs = 1;
+	}
+	return relo_params->smm_save_state_in_msrs;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The relocation work is actually performed in SMM context, but the code
+ * resides in the ramstage module. This occurs by trampolining from the default
+ * SMRAM entry point to here.
+ */
+void smm_relocation_handler(int cpu, uintptr_t curr_smbase,
+				uintptr_t staggered_smbase)
+{
+	msr_t mtrr_cap;
+	struct smm_relocation_params *relo_params = &smm_reloc_params;
+
+	printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "In relocation handler: CPU %d\n", cpu);
+
+	/*
+	 * Determine if the processor supports saving state in MSRs. If so,
+	 * enable it before the non-BSPs run so that SMM relocation can occur
+	 * in parallel in the non-BSP CPUs.
+	 */
+	if (cpu == 0) {
+		/*
+		 * If smm_save_state_in_msrs is 1 then that means this is the
+		 * 2nd time through the relocation handler for the BSP.
+		 * Parallel SMM handler relocation is taking place. However,
+		 * it is desired to access other CPUs save state in the real
+		 * SMM handler. Therefore, disable the SMM save state in MSRs
+		 * feature.
+		 */
+		if (relo_params->smm_save_state_in_msrs) {
+			msr_t smm_feature_control;
+
+			smm_feature_control = rdmsr(SMM_FEATURE_CONTROL_MSR);
+			smm_feature_control.lo &= ~SMM_CPU_SAVE_EN;
+			wrmsr(SMM_FEATURE_CONTROL_MSR, smm_feature_control);
+		} else if (bsp_setup_msr_save_state(relo_params))
+			/*
+			 * Just return from relocation handler if MSR save
+			 * state is enabled. In that case the BSP will come
+			 * back into the relocation handler to setup the new
+			 * SMBASE as well disabling SMM save state in MSRs.
+			 */
+			return;
+	}
+
+	/* Make appropriate changes to the save state map. */
+	update_save_state(cpu, curr_smbase, staggered_smbase, relo_params);
+
+	/* Write SMRR MSRs based on indicated support. */
+	mtrr_cap = rdmsr(MTRR_CAP_MSR);
+	if (mtrr_cap.lo & SMRR_SUPPORTED)
+		write_smrr(relo_params);
+}
+
+static void fill_in_relocation_params(struct smm_relocation_params *params)
+{
+	uintptr_t tseg_base;
+	size_t tseg_size;
+	/* All range registers are aligned to 4KiB */
+	const u32 rmask = ~(4 * KiB - 1);
+
+	smm_region(&tseg_base, &tseg_size);
+
+	if (!IS_ALIGNED(tseg_base, tseg_size)) {
+		printk(BIOS_WARNING,
+		     "TSEG base not aligned with TSEG SIZE! Not setting SMRR\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	smm_subregion(SMM_SUBREGION_CHIPSET, &params->ied_base, &params->ied_size);
+
+	/* SMRR has 32-bits of valid address aligned to 4KiB. */
+	params->smrr_base.lo = (tseg_base & rmask) | MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK;
+	params->smrr_base.hi = 0;
+	params->smrr_mask.lo = (~(tseg_size - 1) & rmask) | MTRR_PHYS_MASK_VALID;
+	params->smrr_mask.hi = 0;
+}
+
+static void setup_ied_area(struct smm_relocation_params *params)
+{
+	char *ied_base;
+
+	struct ied_header ied = {
+		.signature = "INTEL RSVD",
+		.size = params->ied_size,
+		.reserved = {0},
+	};
+
+	ied_base = (void *)params->ied_base;
+
+	printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "IED base = 0x%08x\n", (u32)params->ied_base);
+	printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "IED size = 0x%08x\n", (u32)params->ied_size);
+
+	/* Place IED header at IEDBASE. */
+	memcpy(ied_base, &ied, sizeof(ied));
+
+	/* Zero out 32KiB at IEDBASE + 1MiB */
+	memset(ied_base + 1 * MiB, 0, 32 * KiB);
+}
+
+void smm_info(uintptr_t *perm_smbase, size_t *perm_smsize,
+				size_t *smm_save_state_size)
+{
+	printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "Setting up SMI for CPU\n");
+
+	fill_in_relocation_params(&smm_reloc_params);
+
+	smm_subregion(SMM_SUBREGION_HANDLER, perm_smbase, perm_smsize);
+
+	if (smm_reloc_params.ied_size)
+		setup_ied_area(&smm_reloc_params);
+
+	*smm_save_state_size = sizeof(em64t101_smm_state_save_area_t);
+}
+
+void smm_initialize(void)
+{
+	/* Clear the SMM state in the southbridge. */
+	smm_southbridge_clear_state();
+
+	/*
+	 * Run the relocation handler for on the BSP to check and set up
+	 * parallel SMM relocation.
+	 */
+	smm_initiate_relocation();
+
+	if (smm_reloc_params.smm_save_state_in_msrs)
+		printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "Doing parallel SMM relocation.\n");
+}
+
+void smm_relocate(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If smm_save_state_in_msrs is non-zero then parallel SMM relocation
+	 * shall take place. Run the relocation handler a second time on the
+	 * BSP to do * the final move. For APs, a relocation handler always
+	 * needs to be run.
+	 */
+	if (smm_reloc_params.smm_save_state_in_msrs)
+		smm_initiate_relocation_parallel();
+	else if (!boot_cpu())
+		smm_initiate_relocation();
+}
+
+void smm_lock(void)
+{
+	struct device *sa_dev = pcidev_path_on_root(SA_DEVFN_ROOT);
+	/*
+	 * LOCK the SMM memory window and enable normal SMM.
+	 * After running this function, only a full reset can
+	 * make the SMM registers writable again.
+	 */
+	printk(BIOS_DEBUG, "Locking SMM.\n");
+	pci_write_config8(sa_dev, SMRAM, D_LCK | G_SMRAME | C_BASE_SEG);
+}