include/device/device.h: Remove CHIP_NAME() macro

Macros can be confusing on their own; hiding commas make things worse.
This can sometimes be downright misleading. A "good" example would be
the code in soc/intel/xeon_sp/spr/chip.c:

CHIP_NAME("Intel SapphireRapids-SP").enable_dev = chip_enable_dev,

This appears as CHIP_NAME() being some struct when in fact these are
defining 2 separate members of the same struct.

It was decided to remove this macro altogether, as it does not do
anything special and incurs a maintenance burden.

Change-Id: Iaed6dfb144bddcf5c43634b0c955c19afce388f0
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Sudsgaard <devel+coreboot@nsudsgaard.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80239
Reviewed-by: Yidi Lin <yidilin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Czapiga <czapiga@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/src/northbridge/intel/x4x/northbridge.c b/src/northbridge/intel/x4x/northbridge.c
index 12a7a40d06..b037cf84eb 100644
--- a/src/northbridge/intel/x4x/northbridge.c
+++ b/src/northbridge/intel/x4x/northbridge.c
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void x4x_init(void *const chip_info)
 }
 
 struct chip_operations northbridge_intel_x4x_ops = {
-	CHIP_NAME("Intel 4-Series Northbridge")
+	.name = "Intel 4-Series Northbridge",
 	.init = x4x_init,
 };