diff options
| author | Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi> | 2018-10-31 02:25:54 +1300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> | 2018-11-01 22:22:12 +0000 |
| commit | f3127d4af71715bfa9e656b1187a3ba544ac8780 (patch) | |
| tree | 84f0e9f572506053134126e73c5374ab61c5aee0 /src/mainboard/foxconn | |
| parent | 22f97009ad94f87ff4995513c3a9969a270aa769 (diff) | |
sb/intel/lynxpoint: Automatically generate the ACPI PCI routing table
This patch is based on a8a9f34e9b7b ("sb/intel/i82801{g,j}x:
Automatically generate ACPI PIRQ tables")
Tested on an ASRock H81M-HDS. The generated _PRT object looks correct,
and the system doesn't show any issue when running. The following
assignments occur:
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:02.0: pin=0 pirq=0
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:03.0: pin=0 pirq=0
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:14.0: pin=0 pirq=0
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:16.0: pin=0 pirq=0
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1a.0: pin=0 pirq=0
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1b.0: pin=0 pirq=6
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1c.0: pin=0 pirq=0
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1c.1: pin=1 pirq=1
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1c.2: pin=2 pirq=2
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1c.3: pin=3 pirq=3
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1d.0: pin=0 pirq=7
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1f.2: pin=1 pirq=3
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1f.3: pin=2 pirq=2
Also tested on a Google Peppy board. The following assignments occur:
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:02.0: pin=0 pirq=0
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:03.0: pin=0 pirq=0
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:14.0: pin=0 pirq=2
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1b.0: pin=0 pirq=6
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1c.0: pin=0 pirq=0
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1d.0: pin=0 pirq=3
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1f.2: pin=0 pirq=6
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1f.3: pin=1 pirq=2
ACPI_PIRQ_GEN: PCI: 00:1f.6: pin=2 pirq=1
A diff of the _PRT object for the Google Peppy board is below. The code
used in the diff has been modified for clarity, but the semantics remain
the same. To summarise the diff:
* The disabled PCIe root ports are no longer included.
* The LPC controller is no longer included, as it has no interrupt pin.
The pins for the remaining LPC devices are each one less. Perhaps the
original _PRT object was incorrect?
* The SDIO device is no longer included, as it is disabled.
* The Serial IO devices are no longer included, but that is due to a
separate issue I am having with this system (the devices don't show up
under Linux regardless of this patch). In short: their omission is not
a fault of this patch.
--- pre/_PRT
+++ post/_PRT
@@ -1,301 +1,157 @@
Method (_PRT, 0, NotSerialized) // _PRT: PCI Routing Table
{
If (PICM)
{
- Return (Package (0x12)
+ Return (Package (0x09)
{
Package (0x04)
{
0x0002FFFF,
Zero,
Zero,
0x10
},
Package (0x04)
{
0x0003FFFF,
Zero,
Zero,
0x10
},
Package (0x04)
{
0x0014FFFF,
Zero,
Zero,
0x12
},
Package (0x04)
{
0x001BFFFF,
Zero,
Zero,
0x16
},
Package (0x04)
{
0x001CFFFF,
Zero,
Zero,
0x10
},
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x001CFFFF,
- One,
- Zero,
- 0x11
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x001CFFFF,
- 0x02,
- Zero,
- 0x12
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x001CFFFF,
- 0x03,
- Zero,
- 0x13
- },
-
Package (0x04)
{
0x001DFFFF,
Zero,
Zero,
0x13
},
Package (0x04)
{
0x001FFFFF,
Zero,
Zero,
0x16
},
Package (0x04)
{
0x001FFFFF,
One,
Zero,
0x12
},
Package (0x04)
{
0x001FFFFF,
0x02,
Zero,
0x11
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x001FFFFF,
- 0x03,
- Zero,
- 0x10
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x0015FFFF,
- Zero,
- Zero,
- 0x14
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x0015FFFF,
- One,
- Zero,
- 0x15
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x0015FFFF,
- 0x02,
- Zero,
- 0x15
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x0015FFFF,
- 0x03,
- Zero,
- 0x15
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x0017FFFF,
- Zero,
- Zero,
- 0x17
}
})
}
Else
{
- Return (Package (0x12)
+ Return (Package (0x09)
{
Package (0x04)
{
0x0002FFFF,
Zero,
^LPCB.LNKA,
Zero
},
Package (0x04)
{
0x0003FFFF,
Zero,
^LPCB.LNKA,
Zero
},
Package (0x04)
{
0x0014FFFF,
Zero,
^LPCB.LNKC,
Zero
},
Package (0x04)
{
0x001BFFFF,
Zero,
^LPCB.LNKG,
Zero
},
Package (0x04)
{
0x001CFFFF,
Zero,
^LPCB.LNKA,
Zero
},
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x001CFFFF,
- One,
- ^LPCB.LNKB,
- Zero
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x001CFFFF,
- 0x02,
- ^LPCB.LNKC,
- Zero
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x001CFFFF,
- 0x03,
- ^LPCB.LNKD,
- Zero
- },
-
Package (0x04)
{
0x001DFFFF,
Zero,
^LPCB.LNKD,
Zero
},
Package (0x04)
{
0x001FFFFF,
Zero,
^LPCB.LNKG,
Zero
},
Package (0x04)
{
0x001FFFFF,
One,
^LPCB.LNKC,
Zero
},
Package (0x04)
{
0x001FFFFF,
0x02,
^LPCB.LNKB,
Zero
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x001FFFFF,
- 0x03,
- ^LPCB.LNKA,
- Zero
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x0015FFFF,
- Zero,
- ^LPCB.LNKE,
- Zero
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x0015FFFF,
- One,
- ^LPCB.LNKF,
- Zero
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x0015FFFF,
- 0x02,
- ^LPCB.LNKF,
- Zero
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x0015FFFF,
- 0x03,
- ^LPCB.LNKF,
- Zero
- },
-
- Package (0x04)
- {
- 0x0017FFFF,
- Zero,
- ^LPCB.LNKH,
- Zero
}
})
}
}
Change-Id: Id3f067cbf7c7d649fbbf774648d8ff928cb752a4
Signed-off-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29381
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/mainboard/foxconn')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions