aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/cpu/intel/model_1067x/model_1067x_init.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org>2012-06-17 10:32:55 +0200
committerRonald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>2012-07-02 19:39:08 +0200
commit042c1461fb777e583e5de48edf9326e47ee5595f (patch)
tree489bf29958a39f8a0169e451c7f080e99d25eadd /src/cpu/intel/model_1067x/model_1067x_init.c
parent9ed1456eff73d1a268eabb84176dd2a2107bf2d7 (diff)
Use broadcast SIPI to startup siblings
The current code for initializing AP cpus has several shortcomings: - it assumes APIC IDs are sequential - it uses only the BSP for determining the AP count, which is bad if there's more than one physical CPU, and CPUs are of different type Note that the new code call cpu->ops->init() in parallel, and therefore some CPU code needs to be changed to address that. One example are old Intel HT enabled CPUs which can't do microcode update in parallel. Change-Id: Ic48a1ebab6a7c52aa76765f497268af09fa38c25 Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@stackframe.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1139 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/cpu/intel/model_1067x/model_1067x_init.c')
-rw-r--r--src/cpu/intel/model_1067x/model_1067x_init.c4
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/src/cpu/intel/model_1067x/model_1067x_init.c b/src/cpu/intel/model_1067x/model_1067x_init.c
index c6d716d958..ddd1381a55 100644
--- a/src/cpu/intel/model_1067x/model_1067x_init.c
+++ b/src/cpu/intel/model_1067x/model_1067x_init.c
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
#include <cpu/x86/lapic.h>
#include <cpu/intel/microcode.h>
#include <cpu/intel/speedstep.h>
-#include <cpu/intel/hyperthreading.h>
#include <cpu/x86/cache.h>
#include <cpu/x86/name.h>
@@ -221,9 +220,6 @@ static void model_1067x_init(device_t cpu)
/* PIC thermal sensor control */
configure_pic_thermal_sensors();
-
- /* Start up my cpu siblings */
- intel_sibling_init(cpu);
}
static struct device_operations cpu_dev_ops = {