diff options
author | Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com> | 2019-03-11 18:00:14 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> | 2019-03-26 11:21:23 +0000 |
commit | 413f5208f0688fb0f44dc3bca0259d1050b254f0 (patch) | |
tree | 90dd269cfdf9ad287a23225f83cd4f4bab57e190 /Documentation/soc/intel/mp_init | |
parent | a7a23874564ec35b6bd76039439e65a7b8149e54 (diff) |
Documentation/soc/intel: Add MP Initialization document
This patch provides documentation for MP initialization
option available in coreboot.
Change-Id: I055808e2ddf03663e1ec5d3d423054d1caa911cb
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31841
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/soc/intel/mp_init')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/soc/intel/mp_init/mp_init.md | 56 |
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/soc/intel/mp_init/mp_init.md b/Documentation/soc/intel/mp_init/mp_init.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..f81ffc143e --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/soc/intel/mp_init/mp_init.md @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +# Multiple Processor (MP) Initialization + +This section is intended to document the purpose of performing multiprocessor +initialization and its possible ways in coreboot space. + +Entire CPU multiprocessor initialization can be divided into two parts +1. BSP (Boot Strap Processor) Initialization +2. AP (Application Processor) Initialization + +* [Multiple Processor Init](https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/manuals/64-ia-32-architectures-software-developer-vol-3a-part-1-manual.pdf) - section 8.4 + +## Problem Statement + +1. coreboot is capable enough to handle multiprocessor initialization on +IA platforms. + +2. With restricted CPU programming logic, there might be some cases where +certain feature programming can't be open sourced at early development of SOC. + +Platform code might need to compromise on those closed source nature of CPU +programming if we don't plan to provide an alternate interface which can be +used by coreboot to get rid of such close sourced CPU programming. + +## Possible Solution Space + +Considering these facts, there are 3 possible solutions to perform MP +initialization from coreboot + FSP space. + +1. coreboot to perform complete MP initialization by its own. This includes +BSP and AP programming of CPU features mostly non-restricted one. Preferred +Kconfig is USE_COREBOOT_NATIVE_MP_INIT. SoCs like SKL, KBL, APL are okay to +make use of same Kconfig option for MP initialization. + +2. Alternatively, SoC users also can skip coreboot doing MP initialization +and make use of FSP binary to perform same task. This can be achieved by using +Kconfig name USE_INTEL_FSP_MP_INIT. As of 2019 all Google Chrome products are +using coreboot native MP initialization mechanism and some IOTG platforms +are using FSP MP Init solution as well. + +3. Final option is to let coreboot publish PPI (PEIM to PEIM Interface) to +perform some restricted (closed source) CPU programming. In that case, +coreboot will use its native MP init and additionally publish MP service PPI +for FSP to consume. FSP will execute some CPU programming using same PPI +service from its own context. One can use +USE_INTEL_FSP_TO_CALL_COREBOOT_PUBLISH_MP_PPI Kconfig to perform this +operation. + +For latest SoCs like CNL, WHL, ICL, etc, its recommended to make use of this +option in order to perform SGX and C6DRAM enabling. + +Typically all platforms supported by FSP 2.1 specification will have +external PPI service feature implemented. + +[References] +- [PPI](../fsp/ppi/ppi.md) +- [MP Service PPI](../fsp/ppi/mp_service_ppi.md) |