summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/java
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'java')
-rw-r--r--java/com/android/dialer/callrecord/res/xml/call_record_states.xml17
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/java/com/android/dialer/callrecord/res/xml/call_record_states.xml b/java/com/android/dialer/callrecord/res/xml/call_record_states.xml
index 9907fe9e2..06309d760 100644
--- a/java/com/android/dialer/callrecord/res/xml/call_record_states.xml
+++ b/java/com/android/dialer/callrecord/res/xml/call_record_states.xml
@@ -225,6 +225,23 @@
-->
<country iso="ba" allowed="true" />
+ <!-- Enable recording for Bangladesh:
+ Based on the Evidence Act of 1872, audio recordings may be admissible as a form of
+ evidence. In civil cases, call recording may be used, but judges decide on when they are
+ admissable. Recordings are considered admissible evidence when a witness is deposed and
+ testifies to their validity before a court. Parties may rely on recordings during civil
+ cases, in order to support their side's version of events. While the use of audio
+ recordings as a form of evidence is common, the Supreme Court has not stated whether
+ recordings can be used as evidence blindly, thus their use is on a case-to-case basis.
+
+ Legal discussion:
+ https://www.thedailystar.net/news/your-advocate-2
+
+ Evidence Act of 1872:
+ https://acc.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/acc.portal.gov.bd/law/7e753733_a368_471e_aef9_b4525cb5082c/The_Evidence_Act,_1872_(Act_No._I_of_1872).pdf
+ -->
+ <country iso="bd" allowed="true" />
+
<!-- Enable recording for Belgium:
As stated in the official response below, Belgian law does not consider the recording of
one's personal communications as a punishable offense. Using said recordings in a