diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'java')
| -rw-r--r-- | java/com/android/dialer/callrecord/res/xml/call_record_states.xml | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/java/com/android/dialer/callrecord/res/xml/call_record_states.xml b/java/com/android/dialer/callrecord/res/xml/call_record_states.xml index 9907fe9e2..06309d760 100644 --- a/java/com/android/dialer/callrecord/res/xml/call_record_states.xml +++ b/java/com/android/dialer/callrecord/res/xml/call_record_states.xml @@ -225,6 +225,23 @@ --> <country iso="ba" allowed="true" /> + <!-- Enable recording for Bangladesh: + Based on the Evidence Act of 1872, audio recordings may be admissible as a form of + evidence. In civil cases, call recording may be used, but judges decide on when they are + admissable. Recordings are considered admissible evidence when a witness is deposed and + testifies to their validity before a court. Parties may rely on recordings during civil + cases, in order to support their side's version of events. While the use of audio + recordings as a form of evidence is common, the Supreme Court has not stated whether + recordings can be used as evidence blindly, thus their use is on a case-to-case basis. + + Legal discussion: + https://www.thedailystar.net/news/your-advocate-2 + + Evidence Act of 1872: + https://acc.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/acc.portal.gov.bd/law/7e753733_a368_471e_aef9_b4525cb5082c/The_Evidence_Act,_1872_(Act_No._I_of_1872).pdf + --> + <country iso="bd" allowed="true" /> + <!-- Enable recording for Belgium: As stated in the official response below, Belgian law does not consider the recording of one's personal communications as a punishable offense. Using said recordings in a |