summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAhmed ElArabawy <arabawy@google.com>2018-06-18 05:55:32 -0700
committerandroid-build-merger <android-build-merger@google.com>2018-06-18 05:55:32 -0700
commitac7eb64de3011b1d268dbdd73b9cc2f5519b126e (patch)
treef976140bb6f918551710769744f29dfc9da636b6 /tests
parent8c6fa96ee475b27678619945106aff89ff7a1f4f (diff)
parentad86bd7a5b8d10afe4568d7511ae74dfca62eec8 (diff)
WiFi: SAR Support: Add SarInfo am: dc3d066444
am: ad86bd7a5b Change-Id: I3547c328cd2cf35c27b9417dcc5dba3bc627a78e
Diffstat (limited to 'tests')
-rw-r--r--tests/wifitests/src/com/android/server/wifi/SarInfoTest.java287
1 files changed, 287 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/wifitests/src/com/android/server/wifi/SarInfoTest.java b/tests/wifitests/src/com/android/server/wifi/SarInfoTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1f0e44c8a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/wifitests/src/com/android/server/wifi/SarInfoTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,287 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2018 The Android Open Source Project
+ *
+ * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+ * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+ * You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package com.android.server.wifi;
+
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse;
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
+
+import android.support.test.filters.SmallTest;
+
+import org.junit.After;
+import org.junit.Before;
+import org.junit.Test;
+
+/**
+ * unit tests for {@link com.android.server.wifi.SarInfo}.
+ */
+@SmallTest
+public class SarInfoTest {
+ private static final String TAG = "WifiSarInfoTest";
+
+ private SarInfo mSarInfo;
+
+ private static final int SAR_SCENARIO_1 = 1;
+ private static final int SAR_SCENARIO_2 = 2;
+
+ @Before
+ public void setUp() throws Exception {
+ mSarInfo = new SarInfo(true);
+ }
+
+ @After
+ public void cleanUp() throws Exception {
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test that at start, resetSarScenarioNeeded returns true,
+ * to allow for initial setting of normal scenario.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_resetSarScenarioNeed_atStart() throws Exception {
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.resetSarScenarioNeeded());
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test that at start, setSarScenarioNeeded returns true.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_setSarScenarioNeeded_atStart() throws Exception {
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.setSarScenarioNeeded(SAR_SCENARIO_1));
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test performing two successive reset of SAR scenario.
+ * The first should succeed, while the second should fail, since it is redundant.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_repeat_reset_scenario() throws Exception {
+ /* Initial reset is allowed */
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.resetSarScenarioNeeded());
+ mSarInfo.reportingSuccessful();
+
+ /* Now resetting again should not be allowed */
+ assertFalse(mSarInfo.resetSarScenarioNeeded());
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test performing set SAR scenario after reset.
+ * The two attempts should succeed.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_set_after_reset_scenario() throws Exception {
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.resetSarScenarioNeeded());
+ mSarInfo.reportingSuccessful();
+
+ /* Setting scenario should be allowed, since last call was for a reset */
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.setSarScenarioNeeded(SAR_SCENARIO_1));
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test performing setting SAR scenario twice with same value.
+ * The second attempt should fail.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_set_twice_same_value_scenario() throws Exception {
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.setSarScenarioNeeded(SAR_SCENARIO_1));
+ mSarInfo.reportingSuccessful();
+
+ /* Second attempt should fail */
+ assertFalse(mSarInfo.setSarScenarioNeeded(SAR_SCENARIO_1));
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test performing setting SAR scenario twice with different values.
+ * Both attempts should succeed.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_set_twice_different_values_scenario() throws Exception {
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.setSarScenarioNeeded(SAR_SCENARIO_1));
+ mSarInfo.reportingSuccessful();
+
+ /* Setting scenario should be allowed */
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.setSarScenarioNeeded(SAR_SCENARIO_2));
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test performing reset of SAR scenario after setting it.
+ * Both attempts should succeed.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_reset_after_set_scenario() throws Exception {
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.setSarScenarioNeeded(SAR_SCENARIO_1));
+ mSarInfo.reportingSuccessful();
+
+ /* Resetting scenario should be allowed */
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.resetSarScenarioNeeded());
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test that at start, shouldReport returns false (wifi modes still disabled).
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_shouldReport_all_wifi_disabled() throws Exception {
+ assertFalse(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test that once Wifi (any mode) is enabled, shouldReport returns true.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_shouldReport_wifi_enabled() throws Exception {
+ mSarInfo.mIsWifiClientEnabled = true;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test that setting sensor (with wifi disabled), shouldReport returns false.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_check_sensor_wifi_disabled() throws Exception {
+ mSarInfo.mSensorState = SarInfo.SAR_SENSOR_NEAR_HEAD;
+ assertFalse(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test that setting sensor (with some wifi mode enabled), shouldReport returns true.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_check_sensor_wifi_enabled() throws Exception {
+ mSarInfo.mIsWifiSapEnabled = true;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ mSarInfo.reportingSuccessful();
+
+ mSarInfo.mSensorState = SarInfo.SAR_SENSOR_NEAR_HEAD;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test that setting sensor (with some wifi mode enabled), shouldReport returns true
+ * only the first time, following attempts should return false (since sensor state
+ * did not change)
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_check_sensor_multiple_wifi_enabled() throws Exception {
+ mSarInfo.mIsWifiScanOnlyEnabled = true;
+ mSarInfo.mSensorState = SarInfo.SAR_SENSOR_NEAR_HEAD;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ mSarInfo.reportingSuccessful();
+
+ assertFalse(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test that setting sensor with different values (with wifi enabled),
+ * shouldReport returns true every time.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_check_sensor_multiple_values_wifi_enabled() throws Exception {
+ mSarInfo.mIsWifiClientEnabled = true;
+ mSarInfo.mSensorState = SarInfo.SAR_SENSOR_NEAR_HEAD;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ mSarInfo.reportingSuccessful();
+
+ mSarInfo.mSensorState = SarInfo.SAR_SENSOR_NEAR_BODY;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ mSarInfo.reportingSuccessful();
+
+ mSarInfo.mSensorState = SarInfo.SAR_SENSOR_NEAR_HEAD;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test setting sensor while wifi is disabled, then enable wifi.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_change_sensors_while_wifi_disabled() throws Exception {
+ mSarInfo.mSensorState = SarInfo.SAR_SENSOR_NEAR_HEAD;
+ assertFalse(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+
+ mSarInfo.mIsWifiClientEnabled = true;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ mSarInfo.reportingSuccessful();
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test having a voice call, shouldReport should return true
+ * Note: will need to report once before starting the call to remove
+ * the effect of sensor state change.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_voice_call_wifi_enabled() throws Exception {
+ mSarInfo.mIsWifiClientEnabled = true;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ mSarInfo.reportingSuccessful();
+
+ mSarInfo.mIsVoiceCall = true;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test starting SAP, shouldReport should return true
+ * Note: will need to report once before starting SAP to remove
+ * the effect of sensor state change.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_sap_wifi_enabled() throws Exception {
+ mSarInfo.mIsWifiClientEnabled = true;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ mSarInfo.reportingSuccessful();
+
+ mSarInfo.mIsWifiSapEnabled = true;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test that setting sensor (with wifi enabled), reporting not successful
+ * Then, we should expect that shouldReport returns true evne if we have
+ * no further changes until reporting is successful.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_check_sensor_reporting_no_success_reporting() throws Exception {
+ mSarInfo.mIsWifiClientEnabled = true;
+ mSarInfo.mSensorState = SarInfo.SAR_SENSOR_NEAR_HEAD;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+
+ /* No call to reportingSuccessful() will be done */
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+
+ /* Now call reportingSuccessful() */
+ mSarInfo.reportingSuccessful();
+ assertFalse(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Test that setting sensor (with wifi enabled), reporting successful
+ * Then, changing the sensor state with no successful reporting.
+ * Followed by reverting to the previous state.
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testSarInfo_check_sensor_reporting_no_success_reporting_revert() throws Exception {
+ mSarInfo.mIsWifiClientEnabled = true;
+ mSarInfo.mSensorState = SarInfo.SAR_SENSOR_NEAR_HEAD;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ mSarInfo.reportingSuccessful();
+
+ /* Changing the sensor state and fail to report */
+ mSarInfo.mSensorState = SarInfo.SAR_SENSOR_NEAR_BODY;
+ assertTrue(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+
+ /* Changing the sensor back to the same value as last reported */
+ mSarInfo.mSensorState = SarInfo.SAR_SENSOR_NEAR_HEAD;
+ assertFalse(mSarInfo.shouldReport());
+ }
+}