From 6dd99fcafe83fed2632a90821de6373516c14a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Patrick Georgi Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 14:04:45 +0200 Subject: cbfstool: have update-fit always work from CBFS On x86, the bootblock can (and will) become part of the regular file system, so there's no distinct fixed-size region for the bootblock there. Change-Id: Ie139215b73e01027bc0586701361e9a0afa9150e Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11691 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin --- util/cbfstool/cbfstool.c | 11 ++--------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'util/cbfstool/cbfstool.c') diff --git a/util/cbfstool/cbfstool.c b/util/cbfstool/cbfstool.c index 5194061f3c..bf589a5a27 100644 --- a/util/cbfstool/cbfstool.c +++ b/util/cbfstool/cbfstool.c @@ -838,16 +838,9 @@ static int cbfs_update_fit(void) return 1; } - // Decide which region to read/write the FIT table from/to. struct buffer bootblock; - if (partitioned_file_is_partitioned(param.image_file)) { - if (!partitioned_file_read_region(&bootblock, param.image_file, - SECTION_WITH_FIT_TABLE)) - return 1; - } else { - // In legacy images, the bootblock is part of the CBFS. - buffer_clone(&bootblock, param.image_region); - } + // The bootblock is part of the CBFS on x86 + buffer_clone(&bootblock, param.image_region); struct cbfs_image image; if (cbfs_image_from_buffer(&image, param.image_region, -- cgit v1.2.3