From fb17a7de89b186de3f939690e547bd9f9fb9c746 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Edward O'Callaghan Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 03:39:13 +1100 Subject: vendorcode/amd/agesa/f16kb/*/PcieComplexDataKB.c: Implicit truncation Clang complains: "implicit truncation from 'int' to bitfield changes value from -1 to 15" -1 is define in 'c11std 6.3.1.3p2' as: [Signed and unsigned integers] Otherwise, if the new type is unsigned, the value is converted by repeatedly adding or subtracting one more than the maximum value that can be represented in the new type until the value is in the range of the new type.60) FOOTNOTE.60 The rules describe arithmetic on the mathem... This is "0xFF" on Mullins and "0xF" in this case. Clang seems to complain about this two's complement in a bitfield as being truncated. As the bitfield is 4 bits wide, (a maximum of 15 decimal), we set the field as '0x0F'. Ideally this field /should/ be set to 'UINT8_MAX' however we still have silly truncation warnings. Change-Id: Ib7476d453ffd932bb911e638117cf9f56f71f269 Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7719 Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) --- .../amd/agesa/f16kb/Proc/GNB/Modules/GnbInitKB/PcieComplexDataKB.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src') diff --git a/src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f16kb/Proc/GNB/Modules/GnbInitKB/PcieComplexDataKB.c b/src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f16kb/Proc/GNB/Modules/GnbInitKB/PcieComplexDataKB.c index 5fd3cca0eb..8630312fa9 100644 --- a/src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f16kb/Proc/GNB/Modules/GnbInitKB/PcieComplexDataKB.c +++ b/src/vendorcode/amd/agesa/f16kb/Proc/GNB/Modules/GnbInitKB/PcieComplexDataKB.c @@ -145,8 +145,8 @@ KB_COMPLEX_CONFIG ComplexDataKB = { 0, DDI_START_PHY_LANE, DDI_END_PHY_LANE, - -1, - 0, + 0x0F, // Start PCIe Core ID (4 bits) - Should be 'UINT8_MAX' however clang complains of truncation + 0, // End PCIe Core ID (4 bits) 0, { 1, -- cgit v1.2.3