From 6e4cb50420b7ddfecf9388e8a3b000ecb6855054 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Roth Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 16:40:45 -0700 Subject: sb/intel/fsp_rangeley: Fix NULL check in gpio.c This should always have been an and, not an or. The only way this would happen is if no GPIOs were getting configured, so we shouldn't ever have a NULL here, but if we did, GPIOs would be randomly configured, which would have 'interesting' results. Found-by: Coverity Scan #1229633 & 1229632 Change-Id: If123372658383f84279738e1186425beba3208ca Signed-off-by: Martin Roth Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18095 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel Reviewed-by: Nico Huber --- src/southbridge/intel/fsp_rangeley/gpio.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/southbridge/intel/fsp_rangeley') diff --git a/src/southbridge/intel/fsp_rangeley/gpio.c b/src/southbridge/intel/fsp_rangeley/gpio.c index 2a2061cb1a..0a287c4dc4 100644 --- a/src/southbridge/intel/fsp_rangeley/gpio.c +++ b/src/southbridge/intel/fsp_rangeley/gpio.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ void setup_soc_gpios(const struct soc_gpio_map *gpio) /* GPIO PAD Settings */ /* CFIO Core Well Set 1 */ - if ((gpio->core.cfio_init != NULL) || (gpio->core.cfio_entrynum != 0)) { + if ((gpio->core.cfio_init != NULL) && (gpio->core.cfio_entrynum != 0)) { write32(cfiobase + (0x0700 / sizeof(u32)), (u32)0x01001002); for (cfio_cnt = 0; cfio_cnt < gpio->core.cfio_entrynum; cfio_cnt++) { if (!((u32)gpio->core.cfio_init[cfio_cnt].pad_conf_0)) @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ void setup_soc_gpios(const struct soc_gpio_map *gpio) } /* CFIO SUS Well Set 1 */ - if ((gpio->sus.cfio_init != NULL) || (gpio->sus.cfio_entrynum != 0)) { + if ((gpio->sus.cfio_init != NULL) && (gpio->sus.cfio_entrynum != 0)) { write32(cfiobase + (0x1700 / sizeof(u32)), (u32)0x01001002); for (cfio_cnt = 0; cfio_cnt < gpio->sus.cfio_entrynum; cfio_cnt++) { if (!((u32)gpio->sus.cfio_init[cfio_cnt].pad_conf_0)) -- cgit v1.2.3