From 2ee6779a64922af755a35ce70f85f2d67b488557 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:52:52 +0000 Subject: The ARRAY_SIZE macro is convenient, yet mostly unused. Switch lots of code to use it. That makes the code more readable and also less error-prone. Abuild tested. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Acked-by: Peter Stuge git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3624 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1 --- src/northbridge/intel/e7501/raminit.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/northbridge/intel/e7501/raminit.c') diff --git a/src/northbridge/intel/e7501/raminit.c b/src/northbridge/intel/e7501/raminit.c index 1aeb4f05d9..4695915763 100644 --- a/src/northbridge/intel/e7501/raminit.c +++ b/src/northbridge/intel/e7501/raminit.c @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "e7501.h" // Uncomment this to enable run-time checking of DIMM parameters @@ -1631,7 +1632,7 @@ static void RAM_RESET_DDR_PTR(const struct mem_controller *ctrl) static void ram_set_d0f0_regs(const struct mem_controller *ctrl) { int i; - int num_values = sizeof(constant_register_values)/sizeof(constant_register_values[0]); + int num_values = ARRAY_SIZE(constant_register_values); ASSERT((num_values % 3) == 0); // Bad table? -- cgit v1.2.3