From 0001a7f1291d303b287050e440cf97be620ff5c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:25:45 +0000
Subject: Example how simple it is to use printk instead of printk_something in
 coreboot ram stage.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de>
Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>
Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>



git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@4450 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
---
 src/include/x86emu/x86emu.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'src/include/x86emu/x86emu.h')

diff --git a/src/include/x86emu/x86emu.h b/src/include/x86emu/x86emu.h
index bd01f20cc4..c52b5567a3 100644
--- a/src/include/x86emu/x86emu.h
+++ b/src/include/x86emu/x86emu.h
@@ -49,7 +49,8 @@
 /* FIXME: undefine printk for the moment */
 #ifdef COREBOOT_VERSION
 #include "console/console.h"
-#define printk printk_debug
+#undef printk
+#define printk(x...) do_printk(BIOS_DEBUG, x)
 #else
 #define printk printf
 #endif 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3