From 1d85700503afdb8516ee945e9e294d4a6aa1c759 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexandru Gagniuc Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 22:38:06 -0700 Subject: cpu: microcode: Use microcode stored in binary format Using a copiler to compile something that's already a binary is pretty stupid. Now that Stefan converted most microcode in blobs to a plain binary, use the binary version. Change-Id: Iecf1f0cdf7bbeb7a61f46a0cd984ba341af787ce Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11607 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi --- src/cpu/intel/ep80579/microcode_blob.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 src/cpu/intel/ep80579/microcode_blob.c (limited to 'src/cpu/intel/ep80579/microcode_blob.c') diff --git a/src/cpu/intel/ep80579/microcode_blob.c b/src/cpu/intel/ep80579/microcode_blob.c deleted file mode 100644 index 689f59e549..0000000000 --- a/src/cpu/intel/ep80579/microcode_blob.c +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@ -/* - * We support updating microcode from CBFS, but do not have any microcode - * updates for this CPU. This will generate a useless cpu_microcode_blob.bin in - * CBFS, but this file can be later replaced without needing to recompile the - * coreboot.rom image. - */ -unsigned microcode_updates_ep80579[] = { -}; -- cgit v1.2.3