From df22f780f1894d1ef2e35d51f430caf8f25211ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Marc Jones(marc.jones" Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:49:57 +0000 Subject: Don't check exclusive IRQ fieldin the PIR table. This field is rarely used (and not used in the LX tables). There is not a good reason to mask off non-exclusive IRQs. Signed-off-by: Marc Jones(marc.jones@amd.com) Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3219 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1 --- src/arch/i386/boot/pirq_routing.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/arch') diff --git a/src/arch/i386/boot/pirq_routing.c b/src/arch/i386/boot/pirq_routing.c index fe4b0b47b4..df201492b2 100644 --- a/src/arch/i386/boot/pirq_routing.c +++ b/src/arch/i386/boot/pirq_routing.c @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ void pirq_routing_irqs(unsigned long addr) for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) { int link = pirq_tbl->slots[i].irq[j].link; - int bitmap = pirq_tbl->slots[i].irq[j].bitmap & pirq_tbl->exclusive_irqs; + int bitmap = pirq_tbl->slots[i].irq[j].bitmap; int irq = 0; printk_debug("INT: %c link: %x bitmap: %x ", -- cgit v1.2.3