Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I4c110f60b764c97fab2a29f6f04680196f156da5
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ifdfd37a59273c3647802bc7cb9774e61f90fe441
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37381
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch changes all existing instances of clrsetbits_leXX() to the
new endian-independent clrsetbitsXX(), after double-checking that
they're all in SoC-specific code operating on CPU registers and not
actually trying to make an endian conversion.
This patch was created by running
sed -i -e 's/\([cs][le][rt]bits\)_le\([136][624]\)/\1\2/g'
across the codebase and cleaning up formatting a bit.
Change-Id: I7fc3e736e5fe927da8960fdcd2aae607b62b5ff4
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37433
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
|
|
MMIO operations are arch-agnostic so the include
path should not be arch/.
Change-Id: I0fd70f5aeca02e98e96b980c3aca0819f5c44b98
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31691
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I40f8b4c7cbc55e16929b1f40d18bb5a9c19845da
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29289
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
We found when ambient temperature low, with now saradc frequency and
delay between saradc power up and start command, there may get wrong
adc value, then get the wrong ramid or boardid, so lower the saradc frequency
and add the delay time between power up and start command.
BUG=b:70692504
BRANCH=gru
TEST=test on Dru in 0C temperature, always get right adc value
Change-Id: I42e49ca63299479912fa05e2a62cba6f2de4b337
Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23515
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
This patch add functions to configure saradc clk and get
saradc's raw value for each channel.
Currently add saradc to ramstage.
Please refer to TRM V0.3 Part 2 Chapter 18 for this IP.
BRANCH=none
BUG=chrome-os-partner:51537
TEST=on kevin board, get the raw value 61 for channel 0,
measure the ADC_IN0 as 0.109V,
61.0/1024 = 0.05957 0.109V/1.8V = 0.06056
Change-Id: Ic198b2a964ccf8bb687441f0e2702665402fff6e
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: bc400316de2d75eccad3990a4187bf2dc49a844a
Original-Change-Id: I542430ed97bd27f9bfcec89b1d703d9fa390d4e0
Original-Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl@rock-chips.com>
Original-Signed-off-by: Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@rock-chips.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/334177
Original-Commit-Ready: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14720
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|