Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I4c110f60b764c97fab2a29f6f04680196f156da5
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
Also, extra-lines added or removed and local includes moved down.
Change-Id: I5e739233f3742fd68d537f671642bb04886e3009
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32009
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch is a raw application of
find src/ -type f | xargs sed -i -e 's/IS_ENABLED\s*(CONFIG_/CONFIG(/g'
Change-Id: I6262d6d5c23cabe23c242b4f38d446b74fe16b88
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31774
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7e181111cd1b837382929071a350b94c3afc1aaa
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31784
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Iab0bd1c5482331a0c048a05ab806bf5c4dbda780
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29303
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Its spreading copies got out of sync. And as it is not a standard header
but used in commonlib code, it belongs into commonlib. While we are at
it, always include it via GCC's `-include` switch.
Some Windows and BSD quirk handling went into the util copies. We always
guard from redefinitions now to prevent further issues.
Change-Id: I850414e6db1d799dce71ff2dc044e6a000ad2552
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28927
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Instead of writing out '__attribute__((weak))' use a shorter form.
Change-Id: If418a1d55052780077febd2d8f2089021f414b91
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25767
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Justin TerAvest <teravest@chromium.org>
|
|
These typos were found through manual review and grep.
Change-Id: I6693a9e3b51256b91342881a7116587f68ee96e6
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23706
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I2e7b756296e861e08cea846297f687a880daaf45
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20355
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7f0d3400126d593bad8e78f95e6b9a378463b4ce
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15963
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Omar Pakker
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
This patch removes the old arm64/stage_entry.S code that was too
specific to the Tegra SoC boot flow, and replaces it with code that
hides the peculiarities of switching to a different CPU/arch in ramstage
in the Tegra SoC directories.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Built Ryu and Smaug. !!!UNTESTED!!!
Change-Id: Ib3a0448b30ac9c7132581464573efd5e86e03698
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12078
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
The NV security team requested that coreboot allocate a 128MB
region in SDRAM for VPR (Video Protection Region). We had
previously just disabled the VPR by setting BOM/SIZE to 0.
Once allocated, the VPR will be locked from further access.
The ALLOW_TZ_WRITE_ACCESS bit is _not_ set, as dynamic VPR config
is not supported at this time (i.e. trusted code can _not_ remap
or resize the VPR).
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted on my P5 A44. Saw the VPR region in the
boot spew (ID:3 [f6800000 - fe800000]). Dumped the MC VideoProtect
registers and verified their values.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Original-Commit-Id: a7481dba31dc39f482f8a7bfdaba1d1f4fc3cb81
Original-Change-Id: Ia19af485430bc09dbba28fcef5de16de851f81aa
Original-Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/290475
Original-Reviewed-by: Hyung Taek Ryoo <hryoo@nvidia.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Hridya Valsaraju <hvalsaraju@nvidia.com>
Original-(cherry picked from commit 9629b318eb17b145315531509f950da02483114f)
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/291095
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Trybot-Ready: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I19a93c915990644177c491c8212f2cf356d4d17d
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11384
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
The NV security team requested that coreboot allocate the NVDEC
and TSEC carveouts. Added code to set up NVDEC (1 region, 1MB)
and TSEC (2 regions, splitting 2MB), and set their lock bits.
Kernel/trusted code should be able to use the regions now.
Note that this change sets the UNLOCKED bit in Carveout1Cfg0
and Carveout4Cfg0/5Cfg0 (bit 1) to 0 in the BCT .inc files
(both 3GB and 4GB BCTs) so that the BOMs can be written.
Any future revisions to these BCT files should take this
into account.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted on my P5 A44. Saw the carveout regions
in the boot spew, and CBMEM living just below the last region
(TSEC). Dumped the MC GeneralizedCarveoutX registers and
verified their values (same as BCT, with only BOM/CFG0 changed).
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Original-Commit-Id: a34b0772cd721193640b322768ce5fcbb4624f23
Original-Change-Id: I2abc872fa1cc4ea669409ffc9f2e66dbbc4efcd0
Original-Signed-off-by: Tom Warren <twarren@nvidia.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/290452
Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-(cherry picked from commit f3bbf25397db4d17044e9cfd135ecf73df0ffa60)
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/291081
Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Trybot-Ready: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I924dfdae7b7c9b877cb1c93fd94f0ef98b728ac5
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11381
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This includes Chrome OS downstream up to Change-Id: Ic89ed54c.
Change-Id: I81853434600390d643160fe57554495b2bfe60ab
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10633
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|