Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
As per discussion with CSME team, ME is NOT using PCI Config
Space register HFSTS2 Bit 10 to update ME power-gated status.
ME goes to CM0-PG state after ME device becomes idle after
Bit 2 of MMIO register offset 0x800 (D0i3 Control - HECI1_D0I3C)
is being set.
And to retrieve the PG status of ME, one should read from the
PWRMBASE+offset 0x590 (which should give the value 0xF9) and
PWRMBASE+offset 0x594 (which should give the value 0xFF).
But, also it needs some time for the ME FW to go to idle state
and reflect these values in PWRMBASE registers after D0i3 bit
is being set. This does not happen instantly.
So, in coreboot, if we read the ME PG state in finalize.c, which
happens just after FSP Notify phase, where actually ME D0i3 bit
is set, we do not read the correct PG state values (i.e, 0xF9
and 0xFF).
But, once it boots to Kernel, if we read those same registers
through iotool mmio_read32 command, we get correct values.
So, removing the ME PG state prints from coreboot, since it is
actually showing wrong information, although ME Power Gating is
successful.
Change-Id: Idd31a9803b4c9db7d4bb8bbec5374583a8df0c41
Signed-off-by: Barnali Sarkar <barnali.sarkar@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20172
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
As per GCC 7.1 compiler struct reset_reply is considered
as uninitialized inside send_heci_reset_message function.
Change-Id: Ide53a9267dfba1a00263ada1d7016a48ecb9aad8
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20739
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
Also unify __attribute__ ((..)) to __attribute__((..)) and
handle ((__packed__)) like ((packed))
Change-Id: Ie60a51c3fa92b5009724a5b7c2932e361bf3490c
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15921
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Field Programmable Fuses (FPF) status maintained by
CSME in bits 30:31 of FWSTS6 for Skylake and Kabylake.
FPF committed means CSME has blown the fuses.
Change-Id: If63c7874e6c894749df8100426faca0ad432384b
Signed-off-by: Pratik Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19747
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch to make common PCI device name between APL and SKL.
Change-Id: I5e4c7502e9678c0a367e9c7a96cf848d5b24f68e
Signed-off-by: Barnali Sarkar <barnali.sarkar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18576
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Fix the following errors and warnings detected by checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '('
ERROR: spaces required around that '=' (ctx:VxW)
WARNING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
WARNING: storage class should be at the beginning of the declaration
WARNING: char * array declaration might be better as static const
WARNING: please, no space before tabs
WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
WARNING: static const char * array should probably be static const char * const
TEST=Build for glados
Change-Id: Ic14ca3abd193cfe257504a55ab6b74782b26bf6d
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18868
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
Fix the following warning detected by checkpatch:
WARNING: line over 80 characters
TEST=Build for glados
Change-Id: I79341f46ca06ac052f987975ccaf975470d27806
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18867
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
|
|
As per ME BWG, there are two mechanism to generate a Global
Reset (resets both host and Intel ME), one is through CF9h
IO write of 6h or Eh with "CF9h Global Reset" (CF9GR) bit set,
PMC PCI offset ACh[20]. Another is to issue the Global Reset
MEI message. Because any attempts to cause global reset without
synchronizing the two sides might cause unwanted side effects,
such as unwritten flash data that will get destroyed if the
host were to cause a global reset without informing Intel ME
firmware, the recommended method is to send a Global Reset MEI
message when the following conditions are met:
The PCH chipset firmware just needs to complete the Intel ME
Interface #1 initialization and check the Intel ME HFSTS state
if Intel ME is not in ERROR state and is accepting MEI commands
then firmware should be able to use Global Reset MEI message to
trigger global reset.
Furthermore, if Intel ME is in ERROR state, BIOS can use I/O 0xCF9
write of 0x06 or 0x0E command with PCH ETR3 register bit [20]
to perform the global reset.
BUG=none
BRANCH=none
TEST=Verified Global Reset MEI message is able to perform platform
global issue in ME good state.
Change-Id: If326a137eeadaa695668b76b84c510e12c546024
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16902
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Add the files to support the Skylake SOC.
Matches chromium tree at 927026db
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build and run on a Skylake platform
Change-Id: I80248f7e47eaf13b52e3c7ff951eb1976edbaa15
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10341
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Use the Broadwell implementation as the comparison base for Skylake.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=None
Change-Id: I22eb55ea89eb0d6883f98e4c72a6d243e819e6d8
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10340
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|