Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The eMMC/SD interface is not present in all Intel platforms so this
change removes the default enable for the storage controller and
instead enables it in the specific SoCs that do provide it.
Currently this includes all platforms except Tigerlake.
Change-Id: I8b6cab41dbd5080f4a7801f01279f47e80ceaefd
Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40371
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Move more Kconfig declarations to drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ and document
them properly. This way, we don't have to repeat dependencies and have
the prompts in a common place. We can also easily hide the prompt for
the header path in case the FSP repository is used.
SP platforms were skipped as their Kconfig is too weird but they
shouldn't hold other platforms back.
Change-Id: Iba5af49bcd15427e9eb9b111e6c4cc9bcb7adcae
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40125
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
|
|
Switch to using Jasper Lake SoC code from soc/intel/jasperlake and stop
referring from soc/intel/tigerlake.
Addtionally mainboard changes are done to support build.
BUG=b:150217037
TEST=Build and boot waddledoo. Build jasperlake_rvp and volteer board.
Change-Id: I39f117bd66cb610a305bcdb8ea65332fd0ff4814
Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39825
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
|
|
This is a follow-up patch to initial copy patch for Jasper Lake SoC.
Remove all Tiger Lake specfic code from Jasper Lake SoC code.
BUG=b:150217037
Change-Id: I44dc6bf55ca18a3f0c350f5c3e9fae2996958648
Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39824
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This is a copy patch from Tiger Lake SoC code.
The only changes done on top of copy is changing below configs:
1. SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE -> SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE_COPY
2. SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE -> SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE_COPY
3. SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE_BASE -> SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE_BASE_COPY
We started with initial assumption that JSL and TGL can co-exist.
But now we see the SoC code in Tiger Lake is relying on too many
compile-time directives to make two SoCs co-exist. Some of the
differences are listed below:
-> Kconfig: Multiple Kconfig options using
if SOC_INTEL_{TIGERLAKE/JASPERLAKE}
-> GPIO: GPIO communities have their own differences.
This requires conditional checks in gpio.asl, gpio.c, gpio*.h,
pmc.h and gpio.asl
-> PCI IRQs: Set up differently for JSL and TGL
-> PCIe: Number of Root ports differ.
-> eMMC/SD: Only supported on JSL.
-> USB: Number of USB port are different for JSL and TGL.
-> Memory configuration parameters are different for JSL and TGL.
-> FSP parameters for JSL and TGL are different.
The split of JSL and TGL SoC code is planned as below:
1. Copy Tiger Lake SoC code as is, and change SoC Kconfig
to avoid conflicts with current mainboard builds.
2. Clean up TGL code out of copy patch done in step 1.
Make it JSL only code. The SoC config still kept as
SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE_COPY.
3. Change JSL SOC Kconfig from SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE_COPY to
SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE, dedede and jasperlake_rvp boards can
bind to SoC code from soc/intel/jasperlake. This step establishes
Jasper Lake as a separate SoC.
4. Clean up current JSL code from TGL code. This step establishes
Tiger Lake as a separate SoC.
BUG=b:150217037
Change-Id: I9c33f478a2f8ed5e2d8e7815821d13044d35d388
Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39823
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
|