aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/soc/intel/braswell/ramstage.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-01-14soc/braswell: Fix P-state tableSubrata Banik
Incorrect bus-core-ratio been used to generate P-state table Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/290681 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Change-Id: I4a34ec80ff3f2ed46dc074c9f8fe06756db8b357 Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12731 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
2015-10-31tree: drop last paragraph of GPL copyright headerPatrick Georgi
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address. Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we imported) looks out for that. This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further editing. Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2015-10-27FSP 1.1: Move common FSP codeLee Leahy
Move the FSP common code from the src/soc/intel/common directory into the src/drivers/intel/fsp1_1 directory. Rename the Kconfig values associated with this common code. BRANCH=none BUG=None TEST=Build and run on kunimitsu Change-Id: If1ca613b5010424c797e047c2258760ac3724a5a Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: e8228cb2a12df1cc06646071fafe10e50bf01440 Original-Change-Id: I4ea84ea4e3e96ae0cfdbbaeb1316caee83359293 Original-Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/306350 Original-Commit-Ready: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com> Original-Tested-by: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com> Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12156 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
2015-09-17braswell: Switch to using common ACPI _SWS codeDuncan Laurie
Switch braswell to use the common code for filling out the NVS data used by ACPI _SWS methods. This code was out of date on braswell so also update it to provide the \_GPE.SWS method. BUG=chrome-os-partner:40635 BRANCH=none TEST=emerge-cyan coreboot Change-Id: I41c2a141c15f78dc0d9482954c157f81bd0759fa Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: 4c4d1ee76f337addf687ca5a9ae2da5e898c2de0 Original-Change-Id: I44424784d5d3afb06d0d58c651a9339c7b77418c Original-Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/298230 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11649 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-09-10fsp1_1: provide binding to UEFI versionAaron Durbin
FSP has some unique attributes which makes integration cumbersome: 1. FSP header files do not include the types they need. Like EDKII development it's expected types are provided by the build system. Therefore, one needs to include the proper files to avoid compilation issues. 2. An implementation of FSP for a chipset may use different versions of the UEFI PI spec implementation. EDKII is a proxy for all of UEFI specifications. In order to provide flexibility one needs to binding a set of types and structures from an UEFI PI implementation. 3. Each chipset FSP 1.1 implementation has a FspUpdVpd.h file which defines it's own types. Commonality between FSP chipset implementations are only named typedef structs. The fields within are not consistent. And because of FSP's insistence on typedefs it makes it near impossible to forward declare structs. The above 3 means one needs to include the correct UEFI type bindings when working with FSP. The current implementation had the SoC picking include paths in the edk2 directory and using a bare <uefi_types.h> include. Also, with the prior fsp_util.h implementation the SoC's FSP FspUpdVpd.h header file was required since for providing all the types at once (Generic FSP 1.1 and SoC types). The binding has been changed in the following manner: 1. CONFIG_UEFI_2_4_BINDING option added which FSP 1.1 selects. No other bindings are currently available, but this provides the policy. 2. Based on CONFIG_UEFI_2_4_BINDING the proper include paths are added to the CPPFLAGS_common. 3. SoC Makefile.inc does not bind UEFI types nor does it adjust CPPFLAGS_common in any way. 4. Provide a include/fsp directory under fsp1_1 and expose src/drivers/intel/fsp1_1/include in the include path. This split can allow a version 2, for example, FSP to provide its own include files. Yes, that means there needs to be consistency in APIs, however that's not this patch. 5. Provide a way for code to differentiate the FSP spec types (fsp/api.h) from the chipset FSP types (fsp/soc_binding.h). This allows for code re-use that doesn't need the chipset types to be defined such as the FSP relocation code. BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827 BRANCH=None TEST=Built and booted on glados. Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adubin@chromium.org> Change-Id: I894165942cfe36936e186af5221efa810be8bb29 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11606 Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2015-06-25Braswell: Add Braswell SOC supportLee Leahy
Add the files to support the Braswell SOC. BRANCH=none BUG=None TEST=Build for a Braswell platform Change-Id: I968da68733e57647d0a08e4040ff0378b4d59004 Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10051 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2015-05-28Remove address from GPLv2 headersPatrick Georgi
Follow up for commit b890a12, some contributions brought back a number of FSF addresses, so get rid of them again. Change-Id: I0ac0c957738ce512deb0ed82b2219ef90d96d46b Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10322 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2015-05-23Braswell: Use Baytrail as Comparison BaseLee Leahy
Add baytrail source for comparison with Braswell. BRANCH=none BUG=None TEST=None Change-Id: I5170addf41676d95a3daf070a32bcee085f8156d Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10117 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>