| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
With using a Kconfig option to add the x86 LAPIC support code to the
build, there's no need for adding the corresponding directory to subdirs
in the CPU/SoC Makefile. Comparing which CPU/SoC Makefiles added
(cpu/)x86/mtrr and (cpu/)x86/lapic before this and the corresponding
MTRR code selection patch and having verified that all platforms
added the MTRR code on that patch shows that soc/example/min86 and
soc/intel/quark are the only platforms that don't end up selecting the
LAPIC code. So for now the default value of CPU_X86_LAPIC is chosen as y
which gets overridden to n in the Kconfig of the two SoCs mentioned
above.
Change-Id: I6f683ea7ba92c91117017ebc6ad063ec54902b0a
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44228
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
All x86-based CPUs and SoCs in the coreboot tree end up including the
Makefile in cpu/x86/mtrr, so include this directly in the Makefile in
cpu/x86 to add it for all x86 CPUs/SoCs. In the unlikely case that a new
x86 CPU/SoC will be added, a CPU_X86_MTRR Kconfig option that is
selected be default could be added and the new CPU/SoC without MTRR
support can override this option that then will be used in the Makefile
to guard adding the Makefile from the cpu/x86/mtrr sub-directory.
In cpu/intel all models except model 2065X and 206AX are selcted by a
socket and rely on the socket's Makefile.inc to add x86/mtrr to the
subdirs, so those models don't add x86/mtrr themselves. The Intel
Broadwell SoC selects CPU_INTEL_HASWELL and which added x86/mtrr to the
subdirs. The Intel Xeon SP SoC directory contains two sub-folders for
different versions or generations which both add x86/mtrr to the subdirs
in their Makefiles.
Change-Id: I743eaac99a85a5c712241ba48a320243c5a51f76
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44230
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
|
|
Introduce the `ARCH_ALL_STAGES_X86` Kconfig symbol to automatically
select the per-stage arch options. Subsequent commits will leverage
this to allow choosing between 32-bit and 64-bit coreboot where all
stages are x86. AMD Picasso and AMD Cezanne are the only exceptions
to this rule: they disable `ARCH_ALL_STAGES_X86` and explicitly set
the per-stage arch options accordingly.
Change-Id: Ia2ddbae8c0dfb5301352d725032f6ebd370428c9
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
|
|
To generalise the choice of 32-bit or 64-bit coreboot on x86 hardware,
have platforms select `ARCH_X86` directly instead of through per-stage
Kconfig options, effectively reversing the dependency order.
Change-Id: If15436817ba664398055e9efc6c7c656de3bf3e4
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55758
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
|
|
For arch/x86 the realmode part has to be located within the same 64
KiB as the reset vector. Some older intel platforms also require 4 KiB
alignment for _start16bit.
To enforce the above, and to separate required parts of .text without
matching *(.text.*) rules in linker scripts, tag the pre-C environment
assembly code with section .init directive.
Description of .init section for ELF:
This section holds executable instructions that contribute to the
process initialization code. When a program starts to run, the
system arranges to execute the code in this section before calling the
main program entry point (called main for C programs).
Change-Id: If32518b1c19d08935727330314904b52a246af3c
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/47599
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The min86 example SoC code along with the example mainboard
should serve as a minimal example how a buildable x86 SoC code
base can look like.
This can serve, for instance, as a basis to add new SoCs to
coreboot. Starting with a buildable commit should help with
the review of the actual code, and also avoid any regressions
when common coreboot code changes.
As the example code itself is build-tested, it should advance
with coreboot and can't rot like documentation might. It also
serves as a check what APIs need to be implemented with the
default Kconfig settings.
Change-Id: Id76ab15fe77ae3e405c43f9c8677694f178be112
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45710
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
