Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I426518e8e18de1c8efcfb7ecb0835df3e257dca1
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39608
Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I6724637c7333ae6be7ada3e8ebe878b2a1061dd1
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38371
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Iad616e98feaebc6d5ec058fbf438ac2002a6b934
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33903
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I23bc0191ca8fcd88364e5c08be7c90195019e399
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32012
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: David Guckian
|
|
Drop 'include <string.h>' when it is not used and
add it when it is missing.
Also extra lines removed, or added just before local includes.
Change-Id: Iccac4dbaa2dd4144fc347af36ecfc9747da3de20
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31966
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I311269967949533264e44fd3bb29ad3a06056653
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31941
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
|
|
This patch is a raw application of
find src/ -type f | xargs sed -i -e 's/IS_ENABLED\s*(CONFIG_/CONFIG(/g'
Change-Id: I6262d6d5c23cabe23c242b4f38d446b74fe16b88
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31774
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
For Chrome OS (or vboot), The PRESERVE flags should be applied on
following sections:
RO_PRESERVE, RO_VPD, RW_PRESERVE, RW_ELOG, RW_NVRAM, RW_SMMSTORE,
RW_VPD, RO_FSG (b:116326638), SI_GBE (chromium:936768),
SI_PDR (chromium:936768)
With the new PRESERVE flag, we don't need RO_PRESERVE and RW_PRESERVE in
the future. But it's still no harm to use it if there are multiple
sections all needing to be preserved.
BUG=chromium:936768
TEST=Builds google/eve and google/kukui inside Chrome OS source tree.
Also boots successfully on eve and kukui devices.
Change-Id: I6664ae3d955001ed14374e2788d400ba5fb9b7f8
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31709
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
* Verify the flash write protection on each boot
* Program non-volatile write protection on first boot
Tested using I715791b8ae5d1db1ef587321ae5c9daa10eb7dbc.
The bootblock is write-protected as long as the #WP pin is asserted low:
* Reprogramming of the status register fails.
* Trying to write to WP_RO region fails.
Programming the WP_RO is only possible if #WP pin is high.
Change-Id: I6a940c69ecb1dfd9704b2101c263570bebc5540e
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/29532
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I252a1cd77bf647477edb7dddadb7e527de872439
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29582
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I3d77a625c5ece7b7ea5476fe0bd42829d1fc72c4
Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29625
Reviewed-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
We didn't have a hard_reset() implementation for these boards. So
select the board_reset() stub for them.
Change-Id: I77651e3844632fb1a347008c96e53d23cc5a2646
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29170
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Now only those UARTs that are enabled in devicetree.cb are initialized.
Tested on Opencellular Elgon.
Change-Id: I145c224148f0cc078bb1c76f588f603e73121a62
Signed-off-by: Jens Drenhaus <jens.drenhaus@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28975
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
|
|
Tested on Elgon EVT board and boots into GNU/Linux.
TODO:
* Add hard reset function for VBOOT.
* Add EC code
* Add SPI flash write protection
Change-Id: I9b809306cc48facbade5dc63846c4532b397e0b5
Signed-off-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28024
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
|