Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The prompts for the DPTF Kconfig options were not necessary, they should
be selected based on what DPTF implementation is being used, ASL files
or generated at runtime. It's not really meant to be fiddled with at
build-time. Also rewrite the help text for the _HID selection, to try
and make it more clear when to use y or n.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I6edcabd28426916d9586d501b95b510dfc163fc1
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43830
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Caveh Jalali <caveh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
In this DPTF implementation, the participant device objects are written
into the DSDT with only minimal Names attached (_HID/_ADR, _STA, _UID,
PTYP, and _STR). All other Methods & Names will be written into the
SSDT. If a device is not used in any policy, then its _STA is set to
return 0 ("off").
BUG=b:143539650
TEST=Compiles.
Change-Id: Ief69a57adce9ee0b19056ce6a11ed8a5b51b3f87
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41884
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Sumeet R Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
Currently, configuring and reviewing DPTF parameters is difficult
because DPTF tables and methods are defined in static ASL files, and are
littered with #ifdefs which both define parameters and influence
behavior (e.g., whether a method is included or not). This patch train
is an effort to bring DPTF support to our ACPI DSDT/SSDT generation
framework.
This first patch is very minimal, and includes only creation of the
DPTF device (in the DSDT).
BUG=b:143539650
TEST=compiles (later tests get more comprehensive).
Change-Id: I14df9f422c911677aeea25552ac1822a9462c58a
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41883
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|