Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This patch introduces 3 helper function for cpuid(1) :
1. cpu_get_cpuid() -> to get processor id (from cpuid.eax)
2. cpu_get_feature_flags_ecx -> to get processor feature flag (from cpuid.ecx)
3. cpu_get_feature_flags_edx -> to get processor feature flag (from cpuid.edx)
Above 3 helper functions are targeted to replace majority of cpuid(1)
references.
Change-Id: Ib96a7c79dadb1feff0b8d58aa408b355fbb3bc50
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30123
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I17c4fc4e3e2eeef7c720c6a020b37d8f7a0f57a4
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29300
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Its spreading copies got out of sync. And as it is not a standard header
but used in commonlib code, it belongs into commonlib. While we are at
it, always include it via GCC's `-include` switch.
Some Windows and BSD quirk handling went into the util copies. We always
guard from redefinitions now to prevent further issues.
Change-Id: I850414e6db1d799dce71ff2dc044e6a000ad2552
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28927
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Linux (4.16) assumes that the PIT interrupt is connected to the pin 0 of the
IOAPIC[0] and panics otherwise.
This might be a Linux bug. The MP Specification 1.4 does seem to mandate
sequential ordering for bus entries, but not for the I/O APICs.
Change-Id: Ibf823eb5b3a29e4590cba915069cdfe5f780edcd
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25799
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I6830a65bc9cea2907f4209bb97a53ccebcbf248d
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25873
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Instead of writing out '__attribute__((weak))' use a shorter form.
Change-Id: If418a1d55052780077febd2d8f2089021f414b91
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25767
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Justin TerAvest <teravest@chromium.org>
|
|
Fix the following errors and warnings detected by checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
ERROR: switch and case should be at the same indent
WARNING: char * array declaration might be better as static const
WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
WARNING: storage class should be at the beginning of the declaration
WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
WARNING: break is not useful after a goto or return
WARNING: Single statement macros should not use a do {} while (0) loop
WARNING: sizeof *t should be sizeof(*t)
WARNING: Comparisons should place the constant on the right side of the test
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: I39d49790c5eaeedec5051e1fab0b1279275f6e7f
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18865
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Fix the following warning detected by checkpatch.pl:
WARNING: line over 80 characters
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: I3495cd30d1737d9ee728c8a9e72bd426d7a69c37
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18864
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Fix the following warnings detected by checkpatch.pl:
WARNING: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
WARNING: plain inline is preferred over __inline__
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: I8ba98dfe04481a7ccf4f3b910660178b7e22a4a7
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18863
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Fix the following errors and warnings detected by checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '('
ERROR: space prohibited after that open parenthesis '('
ERROR: space prohibited before that close parenthesis ')'
ERROR: space prohibited after that open square bracket '['
ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: space prohibited before that ',' (ctx:WxW)
ERROR: space required after that ';' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:ExV)
ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:VxW)
ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '=' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '+=' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '<=' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '||' (ctx:VxW)
ERROR: space prohibited before that '++' (ctx:WxO)
ERROR: need consistent spacing around '+' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '<' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: spaces required around that '<' (ctx:VxV)
ERROR: need consistent spacing around '>>' (ctx:WxV)
ERROR: "(foo*)" should be "(foo *)"
ERROR: "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar"
ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
WARNING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
WARNING: unnecessary whitespace before a quoted newline
WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line
WARNING: please, no space before tabs
WARNING: Unnecessary space before function pointer arguments
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: I2d7e1a329c6b2e8ca9633a97b595566544d7fd33
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18862
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Fix the following errors and warnings detected by checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: open brace '{' following function declarations go on the next line
ERROR: that open brace { should be on the previous line
ERROR: else should follow close brace '}'
WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for any arm of this statement
WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
TEST=Build and run on Galileo Gen2
Change-Id: I13d1967757e106c8300a15baed25d920c52a1a95
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18861
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I8a44a58506d7cf5ebc9fe7ac4f2b46f9544ba61a
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16287
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Omar Pakker
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
It never made sense to have bootblock_* in init, but
pirq_routing.c in boot, and some ld scripts on the main
level while others live in subdirectories.
This patch flattens the directory hierarchy and makes
x86 more similar to the other architectures.
Change-Id: I4056038fe7813e4d3d3042c441e7ab6076a36384
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10901
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|