Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This change moves all ACPI table support in coreboot currently living
under arch/x86 into common code to make it architecture
independent. ACPI table generation is not really tied to any
architecture and hence it makes sense to move this to its own
directory.
In order to make it easier to review, this change is being split into
multiple CLs. This is change 3/5 which basically is generated by
running the following command:
$ git grep -iIl "arch/acpi" | xargs sed -i 's/arch\/acpi/acpi\/acpi/g'
BUG=b:155428745
Change-Id: I16b1c45d954d6440fb9db1d3710063a47b582eae
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40938
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
|
|
This change moves all ACPI table support in coreboot currently living
under arch/x86 into common code to make it architecture
independent. ACPI table generation is not really tied to any
architecture and hence it makes sense to move this to its own directory.
In order to make it easier to review, this change is being split into
multiple CLs. This is change 1/5 which moves .c files from arch/x86 to
acpi/.
The only acpi files that are still retained under arch/x86 are:
a. acpi_s3.c: This doesn't really deal with ACPI tables. Also, there
are some assumptions in there about SMM which will have to be resolved
if this file needs to be moved to common code.
b. acpi_bert_storage.c/bert_storage.h: This file is currently written
specifically with x86 in mind. So, not moving the file for now.
Motivation for this change: Not all stages on Picasso SoC are targeted
for the same architecture. For example, verstage (if runs before
bootblock) will be targeted for non-x86. This makes it difficult to
add device tree to verstage which would be required to get to SoC
configs from the tree. This is because the device tree on x86
platforms currently contains a lot of devices that require ACPI
related enums and structs (like acpi_gpio, acpi_pld, acpi_dp and so
on). Hence, this change removes all ACPI table support out of
arch/x86.
BUG=b:155428745
Change-Id: Icc6b793c52c86483a8c52e0555619e36869a869e
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40930
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
ACPI_SATA_GENERATOR is currently used to include sata.c in
ramstage. However, there is no need to guard this inclusion using a
separate Kconfig. All other files that deal with ACPI tables are
included based on the state of HAVE_ACPI_TABLES. This change includes
sata.c in ramstage if HAVE_ACPI_TABLES is selected. If the ACPI
function isn't used, linker will optimize it out.
BUG=b:155428745
Change-Id: I9a319cfe7c3f973b15ccbd0f13bd1ed07571a398
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40928
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
While I was working on updating the headers to move copyrights into
the AUTHORS file, I got a request to switch to SPDX headers as well.
Linux has moved completely to SPDX headers, which are easier to
maintain, have good definitions, are very short, and can be checked
automatically. This is completely unlike our current header situation.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: Ie86d34f7fa7bf7434ad8a38aa1eadcfece7124b3
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36176
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
As discussed on the mailing list and voted upon, the coreboot project
is going to move the majority of copyrights out of the headers and into
an AUTHORS file. This will happen a bit at a time, as we'll be unifying
license headers at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: Id3382d19088cba2703350339b0bd0cfb3c0e63b2
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34604
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Match the corresonding Intel definitions for the ACPI register
definitions.
Change-Id: Ib804f4544d04fe08fefa493d75e0375de7cf9348
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21883
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc@marcjonesconsulting.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I1b2d82a85194df6660bc041af8a690acc5469d02
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20735
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7a4f1bd5c9e3c8152ebdd9118adddbc526d03a53
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15959
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
In the ACPI specification the PM1 register locations are well
defined, but the sleep type values are hardware specific. That
said, the Intel chipsets have been consistent with the values
they use. Therefore, provide those hardware definitions as well
a helper function for translating the hardware values to the
more high level ACPI sleep values.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:54977
Change-Id: Iaeda082e362de5d440256d05e6885b3388ffbe43
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15666
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
These were mostly written as part of the coreboot project, so get
the standard coreboot license header.
Change-Id: Ief13339647d3172e65bb18e6dcb54312a5c9472e
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12917
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
generate_sata_ssdt_ports() generates ports based on sata enable map
Change-Id: Ie68e19c93f093d6c61634c4adfde484b88f28a77
Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9708
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
|