Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Commit 35599f9a6671 (Docs: Replace Recommonmark with MyST Parser)
converted recommonmark style toctrees in bulk using a script. This was
done by searching for lists of references, which is how recommonmark
denoted toctree entries. However, this also converted lists of external
URLs, which would not normally be included in the toctree. Revert these
cases back to lists of URLs as they were before the migration.
Change-Id: Ie4da3d908d4b84c2c7e3572fb4baaeed1f8edb45
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/84244
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
|
|
Recommonmark has been deprecated since 2021 [1] and the last release was
over 3 years ago [2]. As per their announcement, Markedly Structured
Text (MyST) Parser [3] is the recommended replacement.
For the most part, the existing documentation is compatible with MyST,
as both parsers are built around the CommonMark flavor of Markdown. The
main difference that affects coreboot is how the Sphinx toctree is
generated. Recommonmark has a feature called auto_toc_tree, which
converts single level lists of references into a toctree:
* [Part 1: Starting from scratch](part1.md)
* [Part 2: Submitting a patch to coreboot.org](part2.md)
* [Part 3: Writing unit tests](part3.md)
* [Managing local additions](managing_local_additions.md)
* [Flashing firmware](flashing_firmware/index.md)
MyST Parser does not provide a replacement for this feature, meaning the
toctree must be defined manually. This is done using MyST's syntax for
Sphinx directives:
```{toctree}
:maxdepth: 1
Part 1: Starting from scratch <part1.md>
Part 2: Submitting a patch to coreboot.org <part2.md>
Part 3: Writing unit tests <part3.md>
Managing local additions <managing_local_additions.md>
Flashing firmware <flashing_firmware/index.md>
```
Internally, auto_toc_tree essentially converts lists of references into
the Sphinx toctree structure that the MyST syntax above more directly
represents.
The toctrees were converted to the MyST syntax using the following
command and Python script:
`find ./ -iname "*.md" | xargs -n 1 python conv_toctree.py`
```
import re
import sys
in_list = False
f = open(sys.argv[1])
lines = f.readlines()
f.close()
with open(sys.argv[1], "w") as f:
for line in lines:
match = re.match(r"^[-*+] \[(.*)\]\((.*)\)$", line)
if match is not None:
if not in_list:
in_list = True
f.write("```{toctree}\n")
f.write(":maxdepth: 1\n\n")
f.write(match.group(1) + " <" + match.group(2) + ">\n")
else:
if in_list:
f.write("```\n")
f.write(line)
in_list = False
if in_list:
f.write("```\n")
```
While this does add a little more work for creating the toctree, this
does give more control over exactly what goes into the toctree. For
instance, lists of links to external resources currently end up in the
toctree, but we may want to limit it to pages within coreboot.
This change does break rendering and navigation of the documentation in
applications that can render Markdown, such as Okular, Gitiles, or the
GitHub mirror. Assuming the docs are mainly intended to be viewed after
being rendered to doc.coreboot.org, this is probably not an issue in
practice.
Another difference is that MyST natively supports Markdown tables,
whereas with Recommonmark, tables had to be written in embedded rST [4].
However, MyST also supports embedded rST, so the existing tables can be
easily converted as the syntax is nearly identical.
These were converted using
`find ./ -iname "*.md" | xargs -n 1 sed -i "s/eval_rst/{eval-rst}/"`
Makefile.sphinx and conf.py were regenerated from scratch by running
`sphinx-quickstart` using the updated version of Sphinx, which removes a
lot of old commented out boilerplate. Any relevant changes coreboot had
made on top of the previous autogenerated versions of these files were
ported over to the newly generated file.
From some initial testing the generated webpages appear and function
identically to the existing documentation built with Recommonmark.
TEST: `make -C util/docker docker-build-docs` builds the documentation
successfully and the generated output renders properly when viewed in
a web browser.
[1] https://github.com/readthedocs/recommonmark/issues/221
[2] https://pypi.org/project/recommonmark/
[3] https://myst-parser.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
[4] https://doc.coreboot.org/getting_started/writing_documentation.html
Change-Id: I0837c1722fa56d25c9441ea218e943d8f3d9b804
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/73158
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I464170e60a22f39225044c6794d091455d931e9c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80128
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
- The 4.19 release notes included a list of outstanding issues formatted
as a markdown table, which is not supported by Recommonmark. Reformat
as an embedded reStructuredText table.
- The table of boards supported on the 4.18 branch did not include row
separators causing all rows to be rendered in a single row of cells.
- Technotes/console.md had a typo in the rST table formatting which
generated warnings in the Sphinx build, causing the table to not be
rendered in the resulting html.
Change-Id: I86e2c5d6d20e6002b87efc4688fc11b24b341227
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Chin <nic.c3.14@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/72623
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
|
|
This explains how to enable the SMBus console in coreboot
and its Kconfigs.
Change-Id: I50cafbbaaea133c9ea50131e455151287c96176a
Signed-off-by: Husni Faiz <ahamedhusni73@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/67386
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <inforichland@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Branding changes to unify and update Chrome OS to ChromeOS (removing the
space).
This CL also includes changing Chromium OS to ChromiumOS as well.
BUG=None
TEST=N/A
Change-Id: I39af9f1069b62747dbfeebdd62d85fabfa655dcd
Signed-off-by: Jon Murphy <jpmurphy@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/65479
Reviewed-by: Jack Rosenthal <jrosenth@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
|
|
Code coverage requires `lcov`, so update the docs to call it out
specifically.
Signed-off-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@google.com>
Change-Id: Ie2898faa5188a7174c4e56ba34f1a4f02f939b03
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58633
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
These issues were found and fixed by codespell, a useful tool for
finding spelling errors.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: If2a8e97911420c19e9365d5c28810b998f2c2ac8
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58078
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Some files weren't properly hooked up, making Sphinx complain.
Change-Id: If959fa63d4ddbc3916c49c5ad6602e76b12a7e60
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55020
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@mailbox.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Fix the exclusion path for lcov; it should exclude the directory
with source code, not object files.
Use the COV environment variable to
* control whether we build for coverage or not
* select the output directory
Add a separate target for generating the report, so we can get a
report for all of the tests together or just a single test.
Add documentation.
Signed-off-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@google.com>
Change-Id: I2bd2bfdedfab291aabeaa968c10b17e9b61c9c0a
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54072
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Czapiga <jacz@semihalf.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I710ea495798597189941620c7e48fd5aa7476781
Signed-off-by: Harshit Sharma <harshitsharmajs@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44814
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>
Change-Id: I1ebd2786a49ec8bc25e209d67ecc4c94b475442d
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41727
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>
Change-Id: I552d6c3373219978b8e5fd4304f993d920425431
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39893
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I8676f89399a0def3409f19dc92e4f65924d0ba22
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36200
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
The manifest example has to be marked as code. The Manifest parsing
section header should be L2 and finally # is a special character in
markdown.
Change-Id: I38cb1a508ec9ccb39cb39048de3742a5cb595f7b
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36199
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
I originally put up this document for discussion in 2015
(mailing list: https://mail.coreboot.org/hyperkitty/list/coreboot@coreboot.org/message/FXX4V2OSXAQC4B2VUENSFZEWRPPOVRH2/)
(doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o2bFl5HCHDFPccQsOwa-75A8TWojjFiGK3r0yeIc7Vo/edit)
It may be time to revisit the way we define our image layouts now that
there are new fmap schemes for new vboot uses. The approach outlined in
this document may or may not be the right one, but it's something we
have, so let's discuss.
Compared to the doc, this will
* be updated (things changed in the last 3.5 yearws)
* integrate feedback to the doc and on the mailing list back then
Change-Id: Ib40d286e2c9b817f55e58ecc5c9bc8b832ac5783
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32687
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
Change-Id: Icba9d7910dfd46f32a2c46b6fd064a9cc8e3beac
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19242
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|