summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJulius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>2021-12-08 10:04:25 -0800
committerFelix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>2021-12-13 14:14:39 +0000
commit25096eb9504c569ee28eb33afee7a3472b01502d (patch)
tree9101c2481726b170e0f9e6c2e393089fa7bdb7d6 /src/lib
parent20ad36547e25d769184a411c46486c6266d593f4 (diff)
cbfs: Enable CBFS verification Kconfigs
With the elimination of remaining non-verifying CBFS APIs in CB:59682, CBFS verification is now ready to be used in its simplest form, so enable the respective Kconfig options in menuconfig. Add a few more restrictions to the TOCTOU_SAFETY option for problems that haven't been solved yet, and transform a comment in cbfs.c into a die() to make sure we don't accidentally forget implementing it once vboot integration gets added. Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Change-Id: Ifeba5c962c943856ab79bc6c4cb90a60c1de4a60 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/59982 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Jakub Czapiga <jacz@semihalf.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/lib')
-rw-r--r--src/lib/Kconfig.cbfs_verification52
-rw-r--r--src/lib/cbfs.c2
2 files changed, 34 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/src/lib/Kconfig.cbfs_verification b/src/lib/Kconfig.cbfs_verification
index fa90d9d9af..33e5458650 100644
--- a/src/lib/Kconfig.cbfs_verification
+++ b/src/lib/Kconfig.cbfs_verification
@@ -2,33 +2,41 @@
#
# This file is sourced from src/security/Kconfig for menuconfig convenience.
-#menu "CBFS verification" # TODO: enable once it works
+menu "CBFS verification"
config CBFS_VERIFICATION
- bool # TODO: make user selectable once it works
+ bool "Enable CBFS verification"
depends on !VBOOT_STARTS_BEFORE_BOOTBLOCK # this is gonna get tricky...
select VBOOT_LIB
help
- Work in progress. Do not use (yet).
+ Say yes here to enable code that cryptographically verifies each CBFS
+ file as it gets loaded by chaining it to a trust anchor that is
+ embedded in the bootblock. This only makes sense if you use some
+ out-of-band mechanism to guarantee the integrity of the bootblock
+ itself, such as Intel BootGuard or flash write-protection.
+
+ If a CBFS image was created with this option enabled, cbfstool will
+ automatically update the hash embedded in the bootblock whenever it
+ modifies the CBFS.
+
+if CBFS_VERIFICATION
config TOCTOU_SAFETY
- bool
- depends on CBFS_VERIFICATION
+ bool "Protect against time-of-check vs. time-of-use vulnerabilities"
depends on !NO_FMAP_CACHE
depends on !NO_CBFS_MCACHE
depends on !USE_OPTION_TABLE && !FSP_CAR # Known to access CBFS before CBMEM init
+ depends on !VBOOT # TODO: can only allow this once vboot fully integrated
+ depends on NO_XIP_EARLY_STAGES
help
- Work in progress. Not actually TOCTOU safe yet. Do not use.
-
- Design idea here is that mcache overflows in this mode are only legal
- for the RW CBFS, because it's relatively easy to retrieve the RW
- metadata hash from persistent vboot context at any time, but the RO
- metadata hash is lost after the bootblock is unloaded. This avoids the
- need to carry yet another piece forward through the stages. Mcache
- overflows are mostly a concern for RW updates (if an update adds more
- files than originally planned for), for the RO section it should
- always be possible to dimension the mcache correctly beforehand, so
- this should be an acceptable limitation.
+ Say yes here to eliminate time-of-check vs. time-of-use vulnerabilities
+ for CBFS verification. This means that data from flash must be verified
+ every time it is loaded (not just the first time), which requires a bit
+ more overhead and is incompatible with certain configurations.
+
+ Using this option only makes sense when the mechanism securing the
+ bootblock is also safe against these vulnerabilities (i.e. there's no
+ point in enabling this when you just rely on flash write-protection).
config CBFS_HASH_ALGO
int
@@ -37,9 +45,13 @@ config CBFS_HASH_ALGO
default 3 if CBFS_HASH_SHA512
choice
- prompt "--> hash type"
- depends on CBFS_VERIFICATION
+ prompt "Hash algorithm"
default CBFS_HASH_SHA256
+ help
+ Select the hash algorithm used in CBFS verification. Note that SHA-1 is
+ generally considered insecure today and should not be used without good
+ reason. When using CBFS verification together with measured boot, using
+ the same hash algorithm (usually SHA-256) for both is more efficient.
config CBFS_HASH_SHA1
bool "SHA-1"
@@ -52,4 +64,6 @@ config CBFS_HASH_SHA512
endchoice
-#endmenu
+endif
+
+endmenu
diff --git a/src/lib/cbfs.c b/src/lib/cbfs.c
index 991c9fe342..3a044f742b 100644
--- a/src/lib/cbfs.c
+++ b/src/lib/cbfs.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ cb_err_t _cbfs_boot_lookup(const char *name, bool force_ro,
RO CBFS would have been caught when building the mcache in cbfs_get
boot_device(). (Note that TOCTOU_SAFETY implies !NO_CBFS_MCACHE.) */
assert(cbd == vboot_get_cbfs_boot_device());
- /* TODO: set metadata_hash to RW metadata hash here. */
+ die("TODO: set metadata_hash to RW metadata hash here.\n");
}
err = cbfs_lookup(&cbd->rdev, name, mdata, &data_offset, metadata_hash);
}